Not A Love Story.? Really.? - Page 5

Originally posted by: federized2210

Ari u spoke my mind!!
I wanted to make a similar post, but u did it ahead of me!
@sneha: that was really a nice 'explanation' that u gave!! Kudos!
@Londondoll : Ur POV is ur own...I appreciate that...we all do...it's a public forum..u are entitled to make ur voice heard...but what u blabbered about the etymology of 'history' and the way u said "u may not know it" proves just how much u vilified the rest of us here!
U aren't the only one who has read Aristotle and Shakespeare and whatever else!!
U aren't the only one who knows etymology of words...we do too!
And ari's post is bang on flawless...
It is true that the show has lost it's way...
We were promised a girl who would be an exemplary figure...instead we now have someone who can't take a step without needing a hand to hold.
U are 'london'- doll...so I'm assuming u are familiar with English shows...well let me assume for everyone's sake that sanyukta needs parth or whoever else to proceed forward...but u tell me...have u watched Grey's anatomy?
That was singularly Meredith Grey's story...so when she fell for Derek, did they stop focussing on the other bits of her life?? Did they stop showing the amazing doc that she is? Did they stop showing her n Christina's frndshp?
That is what we want in SH...yes it a love story in the essence...it is the story of a girl who battles her way past MCPs and ends up changing them for the better...if not that, if she chooses the easier way out, then what's the point of the show in the first place?
So no, ur 'history" etymology doesn't work here!!
Just a clarification!
@ari: amazing once again! Love ya<3

Originally posted by: barauni

@Anu di: Grey's anatomy! Im glad u exemplified this serial!
Kya phataka phoda hain! Awesome comment dear loved it!

@london all : back at cha! Lol!

@sneha n cafe gang: good its good! We behnas rock! :*

@Ari : sachchi masth post hain! Make some more so that we can debate over history n etymology like in this! Love ya :)

greatest part is people go off topic and say whatever themselves and still wish that comments on their topics should not go off topic. I have teachers to teach me of history and etymology i dont need london_doll professor 😆

Ok, the etymology thing. God what is up with this! You try to do a good thing...

Originally posted by: barauni

@Anu di: Grey's anatomy! Im glad u exemplified this serial!
Kya phataka phoda hain! Awesome comment dear loved it!

@london all : back at cha! Lol!

@sneha n cafe gang: good its good! We behnas rock! :*

@Ari : sachchi masth post hain! Make some more so that we can debate over history n etymology like in this! Love ya :)

Originally posted by: --Ari--

greatest part is people go off topic and say whatever themselves and still wish that comments on their topics should not go off topic. I have teachers to teach me of history and etymology i dont need london_doll professor 😆

Originally posted by: london_doll

Ok, the etymology thing. God what is up with this! You try to do a good thing...

I was explaining a reference that people usually haven't heard of. A lot of people don't know of it, many people in my acquaintance hadn't until I mentioned it which was why I explained it. I mean because personally, when someone makes a reference that I haven't heard of I very much appreciate it being explained. That was the only "purpose" behind explaining it.

You know sometimes, might want to believe people are actually doing things to help other people than head straight for the "she's trying to belittle us."

I know I shouldn't be giving clarifications, but when I look back at how awful my explanation would seem from the "belittling" point of view, I had to clear it up.

Post maker, I was in no way "questioning your intelligence."

Arright, for reals now. Got to goo,

Peace out (and breathe a little),

Ashiqui

Originally posted by: london_doll

Ok, the etymology thing. God what is up with this! You try to do a good thing...

I was explaining a reference that people usually haven't heard of. A lot of people don't know of it, many people in my acquaintance hadn't until I mentioned it which was why I explained it. I mean because personally, when someone makes a reference that I haven't heard of I very much appreciate it being explained. That was the only "purpose" behind explaining it.

You know sometimes, might want to believe people are actually doing things to help other people than head straight for the "she's trying to belittle us."

I know I shouldn't be giving clarifications, but when I look back at how awful my explanation would seem from the "belittling" point of view, I had to clear it up.

Post maker, I was in no way "questioning your intelligence."

Arright, for reals now. Got to goo,

Peace out (and breathe a little),

Ashiqui

Oh god Ari I love you for making this post

Originally posted by: snehatalk

London doll...i have no personal vendetta against you...but again i d like to point it out to you that its ur tone which set me off...not the content...

You really like to make assumptions dont you? You assumed none of us knew what etymology and cultural references meant...or we cant distinguish between Socrates and shakespeare...Dont assume..thats all i have to say...and giving references is not the problem...but ur sarcastic foot notes are...maybe u know people that dont know of such ref...but let me assure...people on this forum are well read and well educated and quite knowledgeable...to them ur tone seems not just like u r belittling them but insulting...you sound that way on all ur posts...atleast the last few posts that u have written...i have read them...u have that tone in it...dont believe me? ...go back and read it if u want...haven't u wondered y so many people seem to be offended by u?...its not the content of ur post all the time, that they object to...its the tone...

Please dont repeat that...here is a tip for u by the way...consider it free from us cafe sisters...once you write ur post on any topic...remove any and every sarcasm from it...coz u def dont know how to tone ur writing... so ur post goes from being a normal post to a controversial post...Thats all i have to say in this topic...and am done with it ...Its just my Pov...and am leaving it at that

Yes, sneha is right.
Your previous posts might be ur voiced out opinions but we never objected them
As ur siggy line says that sarcasm is one of the many things u offer, but tact lies in being sarcastic in a different way.
You introducing the word etymology might be for public service causes unknown to us but using it particularly in Ari's post and supporting it with the un-accetable tone of urs sounded downright rude.
You dont hafta explain cuz we know we are right.
Ari's posts have always been a pleasure either way. 1st reading her flawless agreeable content n then back firing any sort of controversial comments.
There is a reason we call ourselves as cafe sisters.
Do consider sneha's advice on our behalf.. its one of the many services we provide not taking a no in return!
Refrain from ur public services else we will hafta refrain from our private works.

make Parth the heroine for RD... 🤣 🤣