Rani not invited 2 the wedding cuz of Ash - Page 6

Created

Last reply

Replies

58

Views

8.6k

Users

36

Likes

12

Frequent Posters

Showbizz thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#51
Rani mukherjee is the most arrogant star in real life . She can be all smile just to look pretty in a picture .She is very rude to the public n press .Here is clip from an incident
Rani apologised to the media for the scuffle that broke out in Varanasi between her bodyguards and journalists on Monday.


The incident tool place while Rani was shooting in the holy city for Chudiyan under the banner of Yashraj Films.


"On behalf of my production, I am apologising to the media if some misbehaviour has happened with the press. We will also want the press to apologise because if they have misbehaved then they should not be reluctant to say sorry," Rani said.

All her responses to media questions were heavily laced with sarcasm and made with a haughty and disdainful demeanor, leaving one wondering what she was trying to achieve through the press conference.

When a reporter interjected with a question just as Rani finished answering the previous one, in what appeared to be a premeditated response she flared, "Zara tameez se. Ek jane se baat kar rahe hain hum. (Behave yourself. I am speaking with someone already.), ."

Then, realizing that she had actually finished answering the previous question, Rani continued, "Bataiye, kya aap ki kathinayee hai? (Tell me, what is your problem?)" Thinking his misery is over the reporter asked Rani about the story of the film.

Rani shot back, "Yeh nahin bata sakte. Bahut vaahiyaat sawaal hai. (I cannot tell. It is a very irresponsible question!)" 😕
Wonder whats so irresponsible about that ??? 😕 😕

Another reporter suggested that she give a brief outline but Rani flatly refused, "We cannot give".

It is customary for film makers to explain the settings of the story on such occasions and Rani could have easily obliged. However, she had an agenda of her own.

"Just be happy that we have come and are shooting here," Rani said instead.

"The film fraternity and the press have a close bond. The point is that we should be subtle and good to each other," Rani added.

On Monday, the scuffle broke out when some journalists tried to get close to the crew members, including Rani and Konkona Sen Sharma , who were shooting on the banks of the River Ganga.

Media persons allege that the security of the crew members roughed them up.

"The things should be like, we go out of here after our shoot and give you our interviews and photo shoots and that's it. What is the point fighting and quarreling over it? The fact is that we both are not male actors, we are delicate females, so if people will create havoc, we would surely not like it," Rani said.



Who would want to invite sombody so arrogant !!
jayy thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#52
i was feelin left out from the wedding..i guess i shudnt feel now as hrithik n srk are not invited either...hahaha..i was thinkin maybe they dnt invite hrithik cos then they wud have to invite susane's brothers zayed, fardeen n then the whole family n then it wud bcum too big...i m jus saying MAYBE..or maybe during hrithiks wedding the bacchans musnt be invited and the war between srk n bachans might be true therefore he was left out too.and rani musnt be invited cos the roshans and khans werent invited and priyanka chopra wasnt invited either...imagine if they invited all these it would bcum too big.personally i think their guest list was messed up..its not good to invite twinkle and not akshay and it in high society its not automatic of the car only has twinkle's name...anyways those who werent invited were lucky as the outfits they wore made them look like they were shooting for ramayan
breathing_irony thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#53
^^the Bachchans were invited for Hrithik's wedding, but I dont think they went for the wedding. I doubt they kept HRithik out coz it would mean calling Zayed n Co. as well....if tht is the case, how did they manage to call SRK's closest frens : KJo n Kajol, but at the same time leave SRK out?

Yes, the wedding list is messed up. It's none of our business, who the BAchchans invite or not----afterall it's their family affiar. HOwever, considering tht the wedding was being so heavily scrutinised by the media, the BAchchans could've been a bit more careful abt the guest list.
mittijalebi thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#54

Originally posted by: psawyer

There's no difference from my point of view. She is welcome to post her comments. But then so am I and so is Simtara and so is anyone else who wants to talk about this.

yes you are, but why do we all have to be so nasty about it? that's what kinda bugs me.

simtara thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#55
Mittiji,

a) please refer to the lengthy PM i sent to you, as it addresses the entire issue

b) kindly be more specific... nasty about our comments towards the marriage/Aish? or nasty about our comments to each other (again please refer to the PM and do take note that I do my best to remain polite and "politically correct" when replying to "attacks" on my comments and thoughts)

c) if it was the prior... as long we present our views in a manner that neither hurts a fellow member (directly..if you're bothered by our dislike for Aish/the marriage, that's an entirely separate issue) or goes against the code of conduct, we are within our rights to comment as we please.
payal99 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#56

Originally posted by: simtara

Mittiji,

a) please refer to the lengthy PM i sent to you, as it addresses the entire issue

b) kindly be more specific... nasty about our comments towards the marriage/Aish? or nasty about our comments to each other (again please refer to the PM and do take note that I do my best to remain polite and "politically correct" when replying to "attacks" on my comments and thoughts)

c) if it was the prior... as long we present our views in a manner that neither hurts a fellow member (directly..if you're bothered by our dislike for Aish/the marriage, that's an entirely separate issue) or goes against the code of conduct, we are within our rights to comment as we please.

mittiji this has become an english class now where you have to give page long answers to fellow members.

also, i find this a bit hypocritical here. we feel that its our right to sit here and pass judgement on what other ppl do for their wedding, love life, etc etc, but when we are questioned about those comments we like to dub that as being attacked.

i may not have many posts but i do know that we are free to question member's comments if we disagree with them and require clarification.

jayy thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#57

Originally posted by: .:Aphrodite:.

i didn't wanna reply in this messy topic but i came across this post

Why do people make Rani like this perfect angel who never does anything wrong. The problem wasnt with an actress replacing Ash.

Rani was supposed to be a close friend. Ash was doing Chalte Chalte and then Salman incident happened, then she was replaced with Rani. None of them (srk OR Rani who she considered a good "friend" decided to let her know)

If thats how friends are then I wonder what enemies will be like? When your friend is going through a tough personal period, you don't use it to YOUR advantage and decide to cash in on it.

Plain and simple.

agree with u...i would be pissed as well if it was my friend..

jayy thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#58

yeh thats true...and at that tym they were said to be very close friends..it wasnt aishwarya's fault..it was salman's so i understand her for being upset at shahrukh and rani.the worst id when they dnt even let her know that she is being replaced...and now these same people will want to work with her and suck up to her bcos she is a bachan...wat goes aroun comes back..

and after all this why should ash invite rani and sharukh..its her wedding and therefore her choice so they can cry over it...doesnt matter..

Edited by jayy - 18 years ago
breathing_irony thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#59
I'd wouldnt really blame Rani for the CC drama.....I'd look at it as more of SRK's fault. Yes, as a producer SRK had no chocie but to replace Ash....afterall, why shd he lose money just coz some1's bf had gone nuts. But yes, he could've atleast informed and explained to Ash properly tht he was replacing her considerin she had shot a few scenes for the movie already.

Tht still doesnt take away frm the guest list being messed up thgh.....wht abt Farhan Akthar----wasnt he Baby B's close fren?

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".