Sone ki seedi hypocrisy

rohini55 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#1
What hogwash they showed in the name of sone ki seedi. If sone ki seedi can be chadoed with adopted child as in the case of ansh, why did they not show that with mannu instead of driving ganga to near-death. The way they have glorified ganga putting her life at risk is deeply regressive. What is the message here? That you can adopt a child but it is your own blood that will be your waaris and for whom you will chado seedi?You must have that waaris no matter what the cost. Just pray to devi maa and you can chado seedi.
The duplicity is made worse by ds magnanimously asking daddu to chado seedi for amol. I'm glad. Daddu complied gracefully instead of wishing for a biological parpota. By the same token why did Ds not include mannu in the seedi function?

Also it is sheer nonsense of daadisa to say she would have chadoed seedi with a great grand-daughter too. Bv should have made jagan's baby a girl instead of just of talking. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. If ds was really so evolved she would have never obsessed for the family's waaris in the firdt place. Mannu to hai lekin apna khoon apna hota hai, the whole family said. These words cannot be taken back by the belated adoption of mannu.

And that puja for the child done by the mothers, why was bhairavi excluded from it? They could have included at least one girl child in the celebrations?
The entire episode was a thinly disguised son-glorification. I hope KB people behave better if ansh have their biological baby instead of pretend inclusion of adopted child. For all that people have cursed Ira she hasnt once spoken of ansh's own baby after amol's arrival. Nor has anyone else in KB.
Edited by rohini55 - 11 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

34

Views

5.7k

Users

17

Likes

191

Frequent Posters

Smiely thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#2
Totally agree!!
My point it,as DS said girl child also let her climb sone ki sidhi. THEN WHY NOT SUGNA'S KIDS ?
They are also DS's great grand kids.
rohini55 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#3
@smiely exactly. She has two great grand- children who count for nothing -- only because Sugna is female. what upsets me is BV passes of obscurantism as being progressive and pats itself on the back. I found the entire celebration and the gratitude shown to ganga by ds and BH quite off-putting. How many celebrations will they have? Why not show career challenges for ansh and jagan instead of endless dancing and clapping to that irritating tara tatta ta music and idiotic plastic smiles all around?
Edited by rohini55 - 11 years ago
ButterflyOnRose thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#4
Bhairavi is dadisaa's poti not parpoti Bharavi is Jagya's sister in relation and Gehna has already done that pooja ? Forgot Bhairavi 's naamkaran?😕and DS was equally happy on her birth as she is now
BH couples all have one son one daughter From Bhairon Sumi to Basant Gehna to Sugna Shyam i am sure Anandi will also have her carbon copy so if JaGan had a boy so much criticism of cvs on this is not fair in my view
-poloenigma- thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#5
this whole concept of Sone ki Sidi function is crap. So much glorification for the male child 🤢 i desperately want AnSh to have a baby girl ONLY!
rohini55 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#6
@ sidra according to you mannu is not jagan's son? If he was, then by your logic the new baby should have been a girl. The reason the baby is male is to enable ds to get a waaris and chado seedi. Not once did anyone in BH say mannu is family's waaris. If they felt that way they wouldnt have cried for jagya's bio child and even after knowing ganga's condition. And ganga herself-- her awful words that her body was useless if it didnt produce the waaris still rings in my ears.

And mind you not just ganga, gehna too promised a waaris when she fought with ds and decided to leave BH. And whenever a BH bahu promises a waaris miraculously it will be a male. So waaris equal to your own blood and male. Of course the rule can be relaxed for others -as in the case of anandi and KB and you can pat yourself on the back for being progressive.

I would rather shows were openly regressive than than this kind of fake modernity.
-poloenigma- thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#7
This importance for the male heir is less in the Shekhars' household though. They treat Shiv, Mahi & Saanchi equally.
ButterflyOnRose thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: rohini55

@ sidra according to you mannu is not jagan's son? If he was, then by your logic the new baby should have been a girl. The reason the baby is male is to enable ds to get a waaris and chado seedi. Not once did anyone in BH say mannu is family's waaris. If they felt that way they wouldnt have cried for jagya's bio child and even after knowing ganga's condition. And ganga herself-- her awful words that her body was useless if it didnt produce the waaris still rings in my ears.

And mind you not just ganga, gehna too promised a waaris when she fought with ds and decided to leave BH. And whenever a BH bahu promises a waaris miraculously it will be a male. So waaris equal to your own blood and male. Of course the rule can be relaxed for others -as in the case of anandi and KB and you can pat yourself on the back for being progressive.

I would rather shows were openly regressive than than this kind of fake modernity.

First of all chill i find this'' mind you'' very aggressive word to me and try to understand my comment first before pointing on my logic I am also a girl you don't need to show me which rule for me can be relaxed and what not
When in the world i said Mannu is not JaGan's son ? i wrote Mannu as JaGan's son therefore said BH couples mostly have one son one daughter cvs tried something different this time They showed two sons for them This is what i said so what are you telling me ? By your boy and girl logic then even KB should be criticized They opted to adopt a handicapped boy not a girl? so pat on the back for what?

about Ganga's track where i said the track was very well done ?I guess whole forum knows i dismissed the track of what she has done if you don't know then not my fault when i didn't comment on that so no need to mind me anything and moreover the tears of family at that time were acceptable They are also humen every person will cry No one among them forced Ganga for this She herself did that For which i criticized her and BH people when did they not say Mannu is not theirs?but are they not humen to cry even for once?

Boy or girl does not matter to me Neither own son or adopted one Cvs will most probably show AnSh having a girl In BH its too repetitive one daughter one son and Anandi will be one more added in the list so JaGan had a boy This is what i said so please relax no need to be so angry at me for this and tell me something i didnt even say

peace out
Edited by sidra08 - 11 years ago
Anjujag thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#9
DS should also have put a gold chain around Amol too. As she considers Anandi as her grand daughter ,and Anandi's Son has made DS par NANI . DS is a rich women I'am sure she could have afforded a gold chain for Amol . Why was he left out ? I did not like it 👎🏼
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#10
I do agree that this sone ki seedi function looks like an act of hypocrisy.
But looking at DSa and how far she has come and what she became from what she was it doesn't look half as bad as it seems.
This is the lady who forced Basant's wife to bear children not caring for her health all because she wanted heirs for the family.Finally the lady dies because she refused to get medical help for her.
Gehna was bought like a piece of cattle and was raped by Basant repeatedly till she became pregnant all for what?She wanted a heir
When Suguna was found pregnant and widowed she tried to force Suguna to abort that child because of the disrepute that child will bring to the family
After the bullet injury when Anandi had temporary brain dysfunction she tried to get a new beendini for her ladesar Jagya all because she thought Anandi would not be able to be a good wife to Jagya.
Considering that this is the kind of past she has she should be appreciated for declaring Mannu as not just as Jagya;s son but the heir to the family too.That is a big step for her.Somebody who wanted to kill an unborn child of her own blood to wanting to adopt someone else's child that too knowing that he is a son of a man like Ratan and regard him as a part of her own family itself is a big step.
After all Rome was not built in a day.Dsa at her age she is still work in progress.
From our point of view it looks like hypocricy but when one sees her journey she has come along way and she is still travelling.
Edited by aparnauma - 11 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".