Was basant legally adopted? - Page 2

Originally posted by: tinoo

See dadisa was not craving a father's name or legality for basant.

She was a single mother leading her life very effectively - and it was her earned property which she can decide to give to basant regardless of his father's name.

Ganga on the other hand is craving legality for Manu - in terms of the singh family's property. She cannot independently will away any property to Manu because she has none.

In itself, if it were just a question of going to school and school enrollment, father's name would be irrelevant.

So what if he is enrolled as Manu ratan singh instead of Manu Jagdish singh? Will it impact his learning in any way? No.

But definitely in terms of share in property it will impact if his name is manu ratan singh - then he cant get any property from singh family.

Ganga is such a little manipulator 😆😆

This is news to me Ganga is carving for Mannu to get share in Singhs property that's why she want Jagya to attach his name with Mannu In which BV it is shown ?😕 it is quite clearly shown Ganga herself saying to goddess she does not want Rat s name attached with Mannu She considers Jagya better fatherly figure than Rat so she wants Rat out of Mannu's life so that in future he does not create problems for Mannu from where property came in here and this will be indeed very complicated for child legally and socially if Rat's name is attached with Mannu while he calls Jagya his father Now at least if anyone asks what is your dad's name he can confidently my name is Mahendra Jagdish Singh and my dad is Jagdish Singh so from where property came in here