Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 35
CHACHI vs CUTEY 11.12
CONFUSED SOULS 12.12
🏏South Africa tour of India 2025: India vs SA - 2nd T20I🏏
Is Yrkkh in trouble?
Happy Birthday champion: Gaurav Khanna
Film Critics Guild issues statement
Akshaye Khanna is the highest grossing actor of 2025!!!
Critic Roshan is back with another review of Dharundhar!!
Dhurandhar emerges a BLOCKBUSTER
Saahil & Pooja Set To Return!!
Industry support for Dhurandhar (a compilation)
Paresh Rawal deletes his distasteful tweet on Anupama Chopra
Next season’s contestants - speculations
When Anupama called Yami Just A Dead Girlfriend Trope
How convenient
Originally posted by: kahiliginger
You are right, the unnecessary distortion of the story is unwarranted for.
If one has to draw a parallel with history during the timeline featured in the track (1719-1720) Mastani was a mere 5-6 year old girl. It makes no sense for them to show Bajirao fantasising about her and future events related to her.Balaji Vishwanath died on 2nd April 1720 and on 17th April Bajirao was declared the Peshwa.Bajirao's first son Balaji aka Nana was born in December 1721. He was followed by another son called Ramchandra in 1723. A third male child was born before the Bundelkhand campaign but died soon after birth. Even after the arrival of Mastani Kashi had another three male children between 1733 to 1735. Thus it is clear that Bajirao-Kashi equation was just like that of a normal couple.The PB creatives are just trying to deceive viewers.