Ok, I have been planning to make this post forever now๐ and I wanted to make it in another thread where Hilly said that members thinks that Arjun lusted for Ovi and had sex, whereas with Purvi, his sex was for love๐. Now, that thread got closed, but I desperately want to write this down and see what everyone here thinks of it๐๐, so here I go ๐.
I believe that without lust sex cannot simply happen. People lust for each other and so engage in sex. Sex isn't like having breakfast or lunch, so when one's biological clock demands food, one eat. Humans do not engage in Sex; say Monday, Tuesday and Thursday of a week, right? ๐ Nor do they plan for sex at 3AM, right?๐ That could be utterly weird๐. Sex happens when people have that urge that can be triggered by so many things...a hormonal change in response to internal or external stimuli, right? So, even if one loves a girl, there has to be that urge or lust for sex to happen, otherwise that relationship will totally be platonic, right?? So, lust is the single most important ingredient for any Sex to happen, isn't it?
So, why is there a negative connotation in that word, lust... it basically describes the passion that leads to sex? Of course, sometime this passion may not be right and lead to rape etc. so I guess, one need to learn to curb that 'lust'. And that is what society demands, lust within a predefined norm...Ok, now I said it all about how I feel about love, lust and sex๐ (can be made into a Movie yaar๐) and feel much lighter๐...say what friendz???