Sulochana and Savita's meddling:Mod note Pg14 - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

96

Views

9.5k

Users

26

Likes

431

Frequent Posters

koolsadhu1000 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#41
About the meddling

Absolutely fair and 👍🏼 to both the oldies although sadly it came a bit too late .

See how it looks .

It is not the U.S . It is India . Middle class India . The families r not elite and the kind who live a bohemian life style and change laws to suit their lifestyle , but simple maharastrian ones who live in fear of social gossip .

They will NOT understand the depth of the great love story between Arjun and Purvi and how the 2 souls were brow beaten into other marraiges and sacrificed . They will see whats happening AS IT IS and comment accordingly .

What they see

That Arjun comes to Purvi's house in Onir 's absence . Its pretty public and will set tongues wagging . Neither will they understand the tyaag story or Onir's super broad mindedness .

They have seen Onir's face on TV in a negative light

They know that Arjun's wife has left him in disgust

They see Arjun frequenting Purvi's house when Onir is not there

They will say ' Biwi chod ke chali gayi lekin dono ki rang raliyaan nahi ruki . Lafda ab tak jaari hai .

The wife has left but the 2 r shamelessly still carrying on .

When the oldies did not interfere they were criticized for not being true adults .

When the oldies looked uneasily the other way after Arjun blurted the truth in the party , nothing was said about their wrong silence . In my opinion they should have taken over then .

But they r criticized now for 'meddling' and 'unfairness' when things have gone too far .

Far too much damage has been done by the sexual crush of the century .

I would like to point out that it is not meddling at all . You see , it affects their life and their reputation too . When tongues will wag and gossip will start like a forest fire , they will bear the brunt of the kaands in their family .

Meddling is what Purvi does all the time , especially when she put herself in charge of Ovi's bhalaai .

This not meddling . This affects the families . Other children r yet to be married off .

Neither can it be justified that Purvi has not gone to them for diddly . She has managed her grief on her own . You see that does not matter . What matters is that two families r suffering from the heated gossip and the activities of the couple r fuelling it more and more .

The oldies , who were silent for a long time , finally spoke up . Its too much , they said . Focus on your marraiges and put a lid on your emotions .

Nothing wrong . Long overdue .







Luv4games thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#42
Kools the only reason that their meddling is being criticized is because it is not in arjun and purvi's benefit otherwise their meddling would be appreciated...i dont care how you look at it, as a married woman it is not appropriate for purvi and arjun to meet each other alone and sit so close to each other especially if they have been intimate before and still have feelings for each other...in real life that could easily turn into something more complex...no one forced purvi to marry onir...she made that choice...onir has been nothing but amazing to her and she knows very well that he loves her to death...purvi's marriage is on the right track and she should focus on that...arjun needs to understand his maryada and stop talking to purvi...and purvi should stop with the baby voice and be stern and make it clear to arjun that he can see his daughter when her husband onir is present otherwise dont come there...arjun can always send his dad or someone else to bring pari to him...people cannot accept arjun and ovi's marriage because it was a blackmail so that justifies arjun running back to purvi but what is purvi's excuse...she has a great loving husband who supported her through so many hard times...

right now the ARVI reunion cannot be justified at all...in Dil mil gaye, the fans wanted arman and ridhima to reunite so they showed them getting intimate and then reunite while she was married to another person and majority of people who wanted them together did not like it because it was in such a poor taste...the CVs have gone way too far now to go back...the only way they can reunite them is by making onir negative or dying which is unfair...
koolsadhu1000 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#43
Exactly . Sulochana and Savita r expected to be reaction less at whatever Arjun Purvi do coz it seems its their business and coz Purvi has not gone to them . Do Indian joint families function like that ? 😆
Since when ?????😆

The problem is Arjun Purvi don't know how to behave in society . They behave badly , oddly , and start something . Always .

The pre marital sex can be debatable but the fact that it was done one night before the wedding raises eyebrows . Were they that desperate ? They were anyways getting married the next day ! Ok , chalo , understand karte hai . But the sex was unprotected and resulted in a baby coz they ultimately did not marry !

When Onir was sentenced in court , they hugged outside the courtroom inspite of being in different marraiges , inspite of a jeeju saali relation , inspite of having a scandalous past that had caught up with them and broken one marraige up , inspite of being in middle class India that will look on in horror at such a scene .

Arjun goes to meet Pari without checking with Onir if he will be present too . Purvi does not turn him away from the door saying politely but firmly that her husband is not present , that she will send Pari to his house for a few hours with Onir later if he misses her that much .

The whole problem lies in their sanskar less behaviour . They behave in such a way that they invite gossip and then the others who comment become the villains .


Edited by koolsadhu1000 - 12 years ago
devashree_h thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#44

Originally posted by: nikki1591

i like ur posts and i totally get what ur trying to say just as any person who knows how to read would.
ignore the haters girl


You are Violating Rule Number #3



This topic has become more about discussing each others likes and dislikes and less about the actual post. Members are advised to not attack other members. Do not get personal.

strega thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#45
The issue in my view is NOT the meddling. Indian middle class families specialize in meddling :) that by itself is not something I have an issue with. They had their facts wrong and the tone was in bad taste. It would be perfectly fair for them to have said that we knoe Arjun came but you need to send him off. But what they said and how they said it made it wrong. In my eyes.
soapwatcher1 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#46

Originally posted by: strega

The issue in my view is NOT the meddling. Indian middle class families specialize in meddling :) that by itself is not something I have an issue with. They had their facts wrong and the tone was in bad taste. It would be perfectly fair for them to have said that we knoe Arjun came but you need to send him off. But what they said and how they said it made it wrong. In my eyes.


Strega, not the message but content (about the sadak wali bachi) and the rendition is what is wrong, you are saying? :) Agree. They could have told Purvi not to let Arjun visit as tongues would wag and even if there was nothing brewing between them, things would be viewed amiss and Ovi might feel badly about it too. Wise old women would have done this to probably better effect, these two women (from the WU) came across as crude and cruel.

Kools, they should have interfered then when Arjun blurted out the truth, they should have intervened and interrogated Ovi when she suddenly appeared married to Arjun, and they should have taken Purvi to task for her part in that hilltop marriage as well. They were quiet then.

Love4games, I think contrary to what you have posted, it is not because it is not in favor of Arjun or Purvi now that fingers are being pointed at these two old ladies but because they seem to have selective meddling habits. Meddling in everyone's affairs, advising equally, is fair and square and yes, as Kools says, realistic and most times perhaps needed in middle class families to keep thinks in check and on the straight. And to clarify, I am not amongst those who want ARVI together at this point, too much water has flowed under the bridge and re-uniting them with a band-aid plot will be ludicrous to say the least.
Edited by soapwatcher1 - 12 years ago
strega thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#47
Janhvi - for the record, I am not for an Arjun Purvi reunion either. I have no tolerance for an on now off now relationship. And I am for taking decisions and standing by the consequences.

And you are right - the content and tone of the message was way wrong

To me, the very same ladies (?) Lost no time in partying at Ovi Arjuns wedding... where was there sense of right and wrong then?

strega thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#48
If only I could spell.. I meant their not there sense of right or wrong :)
soapwatcher1 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#49

Originally posted by: strega

If only I could spell.. I meant their not there sense of right or wrong :)


Were you on your phone? Mine changes stuff like it has a mind of its own! wack to whack, were to where, and of course, their to there!
koolsadhu1000 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#50
Not debating or refuting anyone here but i just want to say this , and i say it coz it is what i see

Content and tone cannot have been any other way . Content and tone are directly proportionate to tne actions witnessed , always . They have witnessed one marraige almost breaking . And a lot of heated gossip with Onir being found guilty in court .

When Ovi said in the party after the secret was out ...why don't u two get together , her comment was found crass coz Purvi had a another husband . But the action of the husband was that of a willing cuckold ...not only he was okay with the sizzling secret , he even swapped babies and was party to their nonsense . Imagine her fury , was she gonna use boundaries in her lashing out when none had been observed in the disposing of her dead child ? Similiarly , are the two grannies supposed to scold in a refined manner if after all the havoc they r still witnessed meeting ? I think not , but thats my opinion .😊

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".