🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025- AFG vs HK 1st Match, Group B, Abu Dhabi🏏
SUPER HEROO 9.9
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sep 10, 2025 EDT
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 10th Sep '25
MAIRA AGAYI 10.9
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025- Ind vs UAE 2nd Match, Group A, Dubai 🏏
Sidharth Malhotra is just the same as Arjun Kapoor, just with looks!
3 Years Of Brahmāstra
How many more chances for Janhvi Kapoor!!?
Happy Birthday Akshay Kumar
Should Janhvi Kapoor Join India Forums
Karisma Kapoor's Kids Move Delhi HC
"I don't like women who are too thin" : Bipasha Basu
Anupamaa 10 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
When Love Finally Grew Up ~ A Rumya Three-Shot [Completed]
🏏Cricket Forum Banner Contest Announcement🏏📢
Navri and her eternal victimisation
Originally posted by: hillydee
It is not that shocking, I am sure everyone is aware of what the world has come to. It is just that Pure-Vi exposed Punni with the same judgemental moral police view and then turned around and did the same thing. Compounded by the fact that she is always acting perfecting and putting her nose in other people business. If she did not behave like that we would not be so hard on her. If you notice we were not in agreement with Punni's behaviour, but did we go on and on about? No, because Punni was doing her thing, and not watching other people's lives and judging them , and behaving self-righteous, as if she cannot do any wrong like Purvi was doing.It does not matter that Purvi she was engaged and Arjun was not a married man, pre-marital sex is pre-marital sex. I doubt very much that anyone would have pointed fingers at Purvi if she did not behave so self-righteously to the point now where she is using that same result of her pre-marital sex to po*n off on Ovi, who was innocent to the knowledge of that in the first place. Clearly in yesterday's episode Ovi stated that had she known of the pre-marital sex she would not have married Arjun.
👏 This is exactly what it is about, isn't it. Ovi, the biological child of the golden couple, Armaan, deserves to win Prince Arjun. How can she be bad or wrong...not possible cause she is Armaan's child. How dare Purvi, the sadak chaap, steal Prince Arjun from barbie doll OviOriginally posted by: pallavi25
Dear Shyamala,Did you read the link from Web MD I posted here and on another post? It clearly says that alcoholism in pregnancy can lead to miscarriage! Ovi's baby was already in delicate condition due to her drinking. Thats why Dr. Onir was her specialist, to make sure the baby survived its mother's excesses! Yes, she got thrown due to Arjun's so-called reckless driving (although it was the truck's fault that suddenly appeared out of nowhere)Accidents can happen and Ovi's baby would have more chances of surviving if it had been a healthy baby to begin with. She was 6 months pregnant and it is possible to save a premature baby even after an accident. Ive heard of such cases, but the babies were all healthy, normal fetuses in those cases. So Ovi is partly responsible, Yes!I cannot understand why everybody tries to support Ovi in all of this inspite of her horrible behavior with everyone in the past? With Archu, with Purvi and even with Arjun after marriage.Ovi is just a spoiled, rich brat who should have been severely castigated by her father and mother a long time ago, when she bartered Purvi's fiance for her own parents happiness! Her family also tries to protect and shield her from all the consequences of her own bad deeds!They didnt show her drinking in Canada but obviously she did...otherwise a non drinker doesnt suddenly start drinking one fine day and guzzle whole bottles without any effort. If you are not used to drinking, u cannot finish whole bottles like that! 😆Ovi is as dysfunctional as Purvi, both have had defective upbringing, both are responsible for whats happened. Then why is half the forum defending the completely unstable Ovi while bashing Purvi ? Because shes adopted? And not the bio child of the golden couple Archana Manav? Princess Ovi deserved Prince Arjun but the sadak se uthayi gayi ladki is to be blamed for everything?