Posted:
@jaishankar
It is indeed foolish to sacrifice but had archana not done so there would have been equally strong arguments as to why she should have sacrificed.her children hate her. She has left them anyway. She should give shravani a chance etc etc.so either way she is not justified.
Like she attended the party. She should not have to show her support to purvi. Or she should have because ovi is her daughter too. And purvi asked her to attend. So either way she is wrong isn't it?
Whatever archana does can be criticised . But is manav blameless ? Now you criticise her for being too good. Whereas she is supposed to be the most crafty selfish and money minded in Pr! If nothing else then her make up
Is too much!
As for purvi Arjun, please tell me did or did not Arjun have a choice to say no to purvi? He could have as well said fine I will not marry you if u say so. But u can't force me to marry ovi ! My point is he chose to do what he did!
U talked about the chawl case. Was Archana's intention in filing the case to hurt manav or save the chawl from imminent demolition? Did she not try to contact manav who so innocently was oblivious to the fact that his sim card has been changed?
Is he so foolish that he could not or did not try to figure out why the chawl people suddenly turned against him. Is archana to be blamed for that? I see that no one ever talks
Of dharmesh or ajit but the chawl case is Archana's fault only!so easy isn't it to be selective. And if it is a wife's duty to support her husband come what may is it not true for the husband too?If the men in PR choose not to use their brains, then they deserve what they get. My POV of course.
It is indeed foolish to sacrifice but had archana not done so there would have been equally strong arguments as to why she should have sacrificed.her children hate her. She has left them anyway. She should give shravani a chance etc etc.so either way she is not justified.
Like she attended the party. She should not have to show her support to purvi. Or she should have because ovi is her daughter too. And purvi asked her to attend. So either way she is wrong isn't it?
Whatever archana does can be criticised . But is manav blameless ? Now you criticise her for being too good. Whereas she is supposed to be the most crafty selfish and money minded in Pr! If nothing else then her make up
Is too much!
As for purvi Arjun, please tell me did or did not Arjun have a choice to say no to purvi? He could have as well said fine I will not marry you if u say so. But u can't force me to marry ovi ! My point is he chose to do what he did!
U talked about the chawl case. Was Archana's intention in filing the case to hurt manav or save the chawl from imminent demolition? Did she not try to contact manav who so innocently was oblivious to the fact that his sim card has been changed?
Is he so foolish that he could not or did not try to figure out why the chawl people suddenly turned against him. Is archana to be blamed for that? I see that no one ever talks
Of dharmesh or ajit but the chawl case is Archana's fault only!so easy isn't it to be selective. And if it is a wife's duty to support her husband come what may is it not true for the husband too?If the men in PR choose not to use their brains, then they deserve what they get. My POV of course.
Cryptocurrency
Seher Hone Ko Hai
Tum Se Tum Tak
