Savita stated wrong facts - Page 3

Originally posted by: sudha100

Savits'a actions cant be justified regardless form whatever background she has come...
Varna sabko licence mil jayega...to do whatever they had to do

Didnt we earlier said that hiding the truth is equal to stating wrong facts???
then what did savita do??omitted the facts which would have proven her guilty...
hypocrisy to the core!!
The mst happy person was savita when she was able to take manav away from archana to canada...it was her wickedness that divorce papers and all...she found her dreams come true going to canada...still such people can be justified .makes me feel...🤢
god bless everyone with one savita in their life...

Savita continues poisoning teju and ovi mind by twisting the fact. Evil grandma she is. She pray and praise god everyday but still making sins by telling a lie.

Savita tells lies all the time. And does nautanki.So there is nothing new in what she is doing. By pointing out Archana's mistakes her evilness cannot be justified or ignored!

Originally posted by: Kalapi

Exactly what fact(s) did Savita hide in her outburst in yesterday's episode? Please elaborate...

I have stated everything in my first post!!
again I would say...Archana did not daan soham to varsha...as tej was told by savita...and it was manav who was going to daan soham legally...and archana stopped and savtia's plan failed...

You can defend savita as much you want, cheers 🥱🥱

Whatever the wrongs that Savita did, were made because of ArMan
ArMan gave priority to Sulochana infront of Savita, and ArMan gave priority to archana family instead of Manav family, all these caused savita to turn into evil person again...

If archana can give soham to varsha for some time...why cannot she give money for ajit...is money more important than soham for archana...

when twins said archu about 'donating kids to someone'...they are absolutely correct, archu should realize atleast now...

i hated archu/sulo characters from core today when they had convo about Manav's opinion on soham-varsha case...

the main problem in PR is ego...no one accepts the mistakes they did...

Originally posted by: sudha100

I have stated everything in my first post!!
again I would say...Archana did not daan soham to varsha...as tej was told by savita...and it was manav who was going to daan soham legally...and archana stopped and savtia's plan failed...

You can defend savita as much you want, cheers 🥱🥱

Sudha, these are fictitious characters, nothing personal and we all forget that when we get involved in these debated. No one is supporting Savita for the lies and other 'unacceptable' things she has committed. But the character was also shown in quite a few occasions to be at the receiving end. Can't we as viewers give her what is her due? Beyond that is the fact that the Cvs always wanted this character to be negative. True she did manipulate Archana/Manav to an extent in Soham gifting track, but it was Archana who encouraged Varshe with Soham in the first place. Then there was that instant that the brilliant docs of Pr diagnosed that giving Soham to Varsha will cure her of her mental illness. It was probably then Manav came around to give Soham to Varsha (although I can't remember clearly now).

Anyway, as I say Savita is only a character...so I rest my case...

Originally posted by: sudha100

I have stated everything in my first post!!
again I would say...Archana did not daan soham to varsha...as tej was told by savita...and it was manav who was going to daan soham legally...and archana stopped and savtia's plan failed...

You can defend savita as much you want, cheers 🥱🥱

@sudha100, please see the old episodes...
Manav was never ready to give Soham and he always wanted to see soham when he came back from work, and he was fed-up with everyday things with archu-soham-varsha-sachu-savita, it was archana who was never clear, she once wanted to give once didn't and once she want to see varsha happy,

I just want to say that it is not all Savita's fault. I agree with the poster {can't remember name now} who said that in the party Varsha had said no she did NOT want to hold Soham and Manav was adamant about not giving Soham to Varsha. It was Archana who snatched Soham from Manav's arms and gave him to Varsha. After they discovered he was missing, Manav told her to remain in the party but she follwed them anyway. When Varsha was standing on the bridge Manav again told her to stay back but she came forward quarreling with Varsha anyway and then she either jumped or fell in the river.

Originally posted by: sudha100

I have stated everything in my first post!!
again I would say...Archana did not daan soham to varsha...as tej was told by savita...and it was manav who was going to daan soham legally...and archana stopped and savtia's plan failed...

You can defend savita as much you want, cheers 🥱🥱

Savita never used words like Archana gave Soham to Varsha in Daan. CVs twisted the sentence and made Teju say to Archana that Aaji told the truth abt you giving soham in daan to your sister varsha...What came out of Savita's mouth and ended up out of Teju's mouth were two different sentences-facts...Thanks to CVS for twisting it around..I say lost in transmission ka funda 😡

OMFG @ Dabulls post

thank god am not watching the showa
m amazed and shocked but well, its not unexpected
Arch can do no wrong and sulo is a saint who only speaks achi wani..
MY GOODNESS..
she really did no wrong, didnt she!!!