Originally posted by: hillydee
Majority View Rules for EKTA and her Crew:
1. Savita is evil, and has no right to defend her son and his hard earned money.
Hillary, I don't think anyone is saying that Savita has no right to defend her son's hard earned money, it's the way she chooses to defend his money that I think is wrong, (and I'm sure many others too.)
If something is illegal, (and it is illegal if there are laws on the books saying so), then it is illegal for everybody. One can't go to court giving excuses for breaking the law and those excuses are accepted.
She is wrong to forge signatures on divorce papers,but Archu is right to commit Perjury in court twice, for Bigamy and calling her husband 'Ambitious,' but the majority sees that as 'love,' and love means not having to say sorry, for such small matters. 😔 Yet, Savita should be locked up and the keys thrown away, because her acts are 'Ambitious,' like her son.
If anyone, (and I'm not amongst them), thinks it was okay for Archana to commit pergury by saying Madhuri's marriage to Dharmesh was fake, then they are wrong. There are certain situations when wrong is wrong. This is one of them. I was one of those who never thought it was right for Archana to ask Madhuri to deny her marriage to Dharmesh so that Vaishali could get legal status as his wife.
Vaishali had enough education to get a good job to look after herself and her child, and I'm sure she could have sough legal means to get financial support for the child.
Anyone who is angry with Savita, (and these are my views), are usually angry because of the means she uses to get her way, either illegal means, by lying, or abusing people, wilfully seesing to harm them. It is a sad day when you have to resort to these means to keep yourself happy.
2. When you love, there is no need to say sorry, even if that love means suing your husband tearing down his reputation, just to show off to chawl people that you have a mind of your own, even if it means committing Perjury in Court and destroying the good intentions of your husband,
I don't think anyone supported Archana in the chawl matter at all. That was just plain wrong.
5. Purvi is right in practicing arrogance, lack of manners, the lowest of the lowest office etiquette and lack of respect for authority. No sense understanding of how a business should actually operate. Blatant Nepotism for one family member is considered admirable and brave, even if it means endangering the jobs of a whole staff. Spending tons of lakhs on office machinery without permission from authorised personnel, and carrying it to home for training to prove a point to boss, is considered Jhansi Ranki, and one must bow at her feet.
Poorvi's actions in the office and towards her boss are wrong and nobody supports such actions and attitudes. Many have said so. This aspect of her character needs to be changed by the CV's because it's not realistic. All this is the fault of Ekta and her CV's.
6. Ovi, Teju are nobodies because they have Manav's Bad Sanskaars because they are without the Great Sanskaars of Archu. Ovi is considered a spoilt brat who only yearns for to-be husband, yet Archu's nights and days of mental 'terms of endearment,' acting same age as Ovi, is considered a beautiful thing from a "perfect,' lady.
I don't know where you got this impression from, but I've yet to see any post where that member just loves all this teenaged type infatuation that Archana keeps dreaming about.
It irritates everybody.
7. Sachu is evil because he sides with Savita, who has brainwashed him as a kid upon till now, confusing his life.🤔
No one considers Sachin evil simply because he sides with Savita.
It's because he's allowing himself to be influenced by Savita into commiting illegal acts.
That is what viewers like me don't like.
He's allowing Savita to use him, and that is sad because he was such a sweet boy.
Sachu should never resent Archu for pretending to give over her husband to his Mother, then backing out last minute, and wasting 2yrs of her life.
Archana didn't pretend, neither did Manav.
Shravani released Manav from his promise just before the ceremony. She told him to go to Archana because she realised that Manav would never love her.
Manav called Satish who in turn told Archana of the latest developments.
Archana had been waiting in her room to marry Jaywant, and only left to go to Manav's mandap on the insistance of Satish.
If Shravani hadn't released Manav from his promise, he and Shravani would have been married and Archana and Jaywant would have been married too.
However, as this is a serial, we all know that even though they may be separated at times, the leads will always end up together, regardless of how we the viewers feel.
8. Manav must not dare to question anything his wife has done to him, because she is the Root of their PR, don't ask questions or expect good actions, just take her word for it. He must never doubt her, never believe she could sign divorce papers, the evidence can never be against her, only against him.
Hillary, no one is saying this at all. Just as Archana doubted him re his signature in the chawl matter, he has the right to doubt her signature in this divorce. They are both wrong for doubting each other in both matters, but no one is saying that Manav must never question Archana on any matter and must simply accept whatever she says or does.
No one loves a mahaan Archana at all.
Wow what love, what Sanskaars, what PRs, that Ekta and her like-minded viewers hold as 'Greatness.' and 'Perfect,' values for young and impressionable minds to Grace their Sasurals and for Sane and Educated Viewers to be baffled and angered by daily.
Hillary, why are you associating Ekta's plots and storylines with some viewers?
Where have you seen viewers liking all that Ekta and her CV's put forth as PR?
If we agree with some of the things that occur in PR, that doesn't mean we should be likened to all that Ekta supports. That is not fair.
By your comment about "Sane and Educated Viewers", are you saying that those viewers who do not agree with you and those who support you, that those viewers are insane and uneducated?
The forum rules state that members should not be attacked for their personal views.
We all will never agree about everything, so one should respect others for their different views, as long as those views respect the forum rules.
CID
Music Corner
