Kool's Commentary : Jan 28 PR - Page 9

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

always did like the good girl Kool...when i was young my favourite was Cinderella , now it is Archana ..that is how I am ...

Me , I liked GRETEL . She pushed the witch in the oven and saved HANSEL , her brother .Muvaaaaaa .

Originally posted by: pallai

armaan are always sliding upto some party.. initially archu took all abuse of savita for manav.. now manav is doing same washing K feet.. why cant these 2 work out a way to keep all in harmony..

for once i want to see leads who are sly .. smart and know how to get things done and not always be victimized...

Originally posted by: carpe-diem

Very upset with Arman these days, it was a bit sad that none of them ran after Savita. Archu always takes Savita's abuse couldn't she make the effort of running after her today, especially when she had come there to bless them.😵

Originally posted by: bhavni88

Why is it then said that Archu paid enough for her mistake in the 3 month stay ..........the mistake she made of leaving Manv on Satyanarayan day ?

Similiarly why isnt it said that Savita paid enough for her mistake of disliking Archu in the first month when she was a bad mother in law ? She did lose a son and a daughter got married to a rapist ..............who has paid more , Archu or Savita ?

Since u are bringing up Who was behind the DIVORCE ..........what led to the divorce in the first place .........was SAvita behind the photos that Ajit circulated on Satyanarayan Day ? No , Archu walked away without hearing Manavs side of the story and hearing her own instinct ..........THAT led to the divorce . Savita , in collaboration with Manju initiated it but who gave the FODDER ? Had Savita told her to walk off on Satyanarayan day and never give Manav chance to talk ?

She lost her son and her daughters life became hell but oh boy no she DIDNT PAY ENOUGH . But all feel soooo sorry for Archu and say she paid enough in her 3 month stay for walking out on Manav !''

If Savita harassed Archu , she paid by seeing Vanditas harassment by her Ma in law .Her Karmic punishment ended there . So WHAT KARMIC PUNISHMENT is she paying nOW ? The one she is getting for accepting Archna as bahu in first place i guess ?

Even after Sachins death she accepted her after the 3 months when her rage subsided .Who told this DEVI .......this whimsical Devi to PLAY MAHAAN and walk off with the whole chawl sobbing after her ?

And then TWO jailings later this whimsical DEVI comes running in a mandap when she is trying to resttle her son once more , saying OH NO I FOUND OUT I MUST MARRY HIM ONLY AFTER ALL !OH NO !

And the full K khandan is giving gaalis to her son and is baying for his blood and calling SAvita cheap , faaltu what not ...Sulo had come to fight with her in her chowk ....Savita hadnt gone to her ........she told Sulo go and look at my house how SOONA ur daughter made it !

What has Archu done till now that Savita shud love her ? Even now , what is she doing ?Only prioritising HER MAAYKA bas .

Compared to what Manav did for the Ks , Archu did nothing for Deshmukhs .....except jumping to save Vandita I guess . Well Manav had jumped to save Manohar even when he wasnt engaged .

Even NOW there is danger to Manav from the Karanjkars . Vinod was giving him to police that day , Dharmu Manjusha r always ready to slaughter him and ALL flip flop and allow it is their HISTORY .

Even if Savita initiated the divorce , she had kept quiet on the day Manav went to bring Archu with proof ,.she had given up then . Accepted her fate that ok this girl is my bahu .But That momment police came and put them in jail and beat that old woman .

Her beating , her loss of son , her daughters satyanash isnt enuf punishment for her , but Archus 3 month stay is eNOUGH punishment for her initial stupidity .Who decides this ?

Just see the LOSSES of the two families and then decide . On one side r REAL losses and on one side is a thriving family and a so called sTUPID love story .

Pardon me , no offence .But thats my two cents .Lets agree to disagree .