Kool's Commentary : Slap Special

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

telemagic

@telemagic

Inactive

Posted: 15 years ago

#41

btw, once Manav and Archu have their Suhaag raat...will we still be calling them HOLY ARCHU and BHAGWAAN...ya NAAMKARAN wapas karna padega...😛

Quote

bhavini thanki

@bhavni88

Dazzler

Posted: 15 years ago

#42

Originally posted by: stillhopeful

bhavni 👍🏼 thanks for keeping count

Kools MOgga. magir post korta. Your commentary was ⭐️ as usual

Mog Hope

thanks Hope..yes I am counting the slaps..

great post Kools..will now read prev posts...

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 15 years ago

#43

Originally posted by: Dabulls23
Thanks for bringing up a point which I was thinking abt posting it while watching..How can Sulo consider rest of the family breaking off relationship with ArMan b/c She has decided to...Aren't Varshu and Vaishu married?? Sulo can insist Vinod-Manju but not order them either...What a piece of crap that was...

JSK my dear nice to see u

So true varsha. She can take decision on HER behalf only ..........even Manohar's decision needs to be evaluated independently ...he has independent relation with Archna as an offspring . The sisters have to decide for themselves .

Manju will now make Sulo hATE Archu by filling ears

Quote

Kalapi

@Kalapi

Dazzler

Posted: 15 years ago

#44

Couldn't help but put in my 2 cents eregarding marriage. As Kools mentioned there are 2 types of hindu marriage - Court: where you sign legal docs, here u don't have to put sindoor or manglasutra ( just because legal courst don;t recognize these - these are done mostly for mental peace for the participant - not a legal requirement by any Court in Indian land).

The second is the hidu marriage where marriage has to take place in front of "Fire'. Those who have immigarted into Canada and USA could know that these pics are supplied to the immigartion office as proof of hindu marriage. I haven't heard anywhere that there is a need for society to be present. This is why hindu marriages are hard to proof and most parents will go for both the court marriage and the vedic marriage to be sure all aspects are covered. Also, in the eastern states like Bengal, Assam don't use mangalsutra rather they wear a iron bangle in their left wrist as their sign of married life. So, generalizing it that for vedic marriage, mangalsutra, sindoor and court docs are needed is JUST wrong.

My parents didn't have courst docs - believe me the marriage is valid and well.....most people go both courst and vedic marriages just to cover all front and in a way Christian marriages are better documented just because they sign those paper......

Of course, maharastrian marriages might be different....different regions are unique to certain extent although being under the same umbrella of HINDUISM...

thanks,

Edited by Kalapi - 15 years ago

Quote

viram

@viram

Navigator

Posted: 15 years ago

#45

👏[Welcome back.Awesome commentary kools .great. Thank you.👏

I am totally against Sulo's attitude. How can she insult Manav like this. As someone has said the slap count has mounted to 3. Wonder how many more she is going to give him.

I find her very inconsistent, illogical and unreasonable at times.She says shaadi guddi gudiyon ka khel nahin. (something to that effect).Then why did she insist on Archu and Manva breaking up the first time after their wedding. Remember the scene when Archu removed her managalsutra willingly a day after their wedding and decided not to wear it if Sulo didnt like it? All these incidents prove Sulo's dominating nature. And even now how can she ask Archu to choose between her and Manav. Would she have accepted this condition if Rasika had said the same thing to Manju?

Crazy .Absolutely crazy!

BTW you are right.Manav's economic status prompts her to slap him at the slightest pretext .WOuld she dare to slap Dhramesh or Satish this way? Or even the evil Manju????😡 No chance.

Looks like slapping runs in the blood of the K family.Mom and beti go around on slapping sprees on unsuspecting people like the serial killer Patthar Maar.!!!!!😆

The highlight was Mano wearing borrowed diapers from Mohan rao and his thoughts.Burst out laughing👏

Quote

Kalapi

@Kalapi

Dazzler

Posted: 15 years ago

#46

In the last post I forgot to mention;

Radha is considered to be the ethernal wife of Krishna, how? they were never married, right?

Also, Sindoor and mangalsutra or the iron bangle is only a women wears, why? why don't men wera them. because these are added on later in the process of marriage...original marriage was each accepting each other as husband and wife in front of the ethernal FIRE - both the creator and destroyer of life?

And wht is sindoor RED? what can't be anyother color like blue or black? And why is managl sutra made of black beads or ladies in eastern Indian wear Iron bangles and not that is made of copper or bronze - when there was a copper and bronze age in history?

Interesting questions but the symbolisim is amazing and not very pretty!

Quote

Mandy

@mandy0310

Alumni

+ 8

Posted: 15 years ago

#47

Originally posted by: viram
👏[Welcome back.Awesome commentary kools .great. Thank you.👏

I am totally against Sulo's attitude. How can she insult Manav like this. As someone has said the slap count has mounted to 3. Wonder how many more she is going to give him.

I find her very inconsistent, illogical and unreasonable at times.She says shaadi guddi gudiyon ka khel nahin. (something to that effect).Then why did she insist on Archu and Manva breaking up the first time after their wedding. Remember the scene when Archu removed her managalsutra willingly a day after their wedding and decided not to wear it if Sulo didnt like it? All these incidents prove Sulo's dominating nature. And even now how can she ask Archu to choose between her and Manav. Would she have accepted this condition if Rasika had said the same thing to Manju?

Crazy .Absolutely crazy!

BTW you are right.Manav's economic status prompts her to slap him at the slightest pretext .WOuld she dare to slap Dhramesh or Satish this way? Or even the evil Manju????😡 No chance.

Looks like slapping runs in the blood of the K family.Mom and beti go around on slapping sprees on unsuspecting people like the serial killer Patthar Maar.!!!!!😆

The highlight was Mano wearing borrowed diapers from Mohan rao and his thoughts.Burst out laughing👏

Excellent post! You are right, she has never laid a hand on Manju or Dharmesh. I remember how upset she got that Archana did that to Dharmesh and how she must apologize because he is the son in law of the family. Sulochana is two faced, it is why I don't blame Savita one bit for her hatred towards their family but its unfortunate that Archana is part of her hatred because Archana is not like that. I am glad Archana chose Manav, hasn't Sulochana put her daughter through enough pain? When Archana and Manav first married, she took Archana away and refused this marriage because Manav was poor. Then as soon as she believed Manav betrayed Archana she took her away again, praying her marriage broke yet here she is willing to marry her daughter off to a man who broke her trust. I can't stand her hypocrisy! I am glad Archana is living her life the way she wants to now, enough sacrifices for these selfish people. Live for your own happiness, she deserves to be happy for a change!

Quote

Sanu4u

@Sanu4u

Dazzler

Posted: 15 years ago

#48

slap no 3 to mannu...
Now sulo is practicing for the 4th one...

Quote

commentator

@commentator

Navigator

Posted: 15 years ago

#49

Some observations on slapping and sanskars:

Perhaps they - or the CVs - need to be told that it isn't right to slap adult offspring. This isn't just a "borrowed"/ "western"/ "rights" issue; you hear parents even in all sorts of otherwise completely regressive Hindi films commenting critically on javaan beti/bete pe haath utthana. Children are held back from responding in kind by the reverence they are taught to feel for their elders; those elders must, in their turn, respect these sentiments, and, after a point (certainly 28/30 years is past that point) treat them as equals in terms of behavioural codes if not in wisdom. In any case, slapping is a knee-jerk reaction that is almost always counterproductive.

If Savita's making comments about the K girls' sanskars, I don't think we need to endorse her harangue. Most of the sanskars dinned into women about how they must behave, particularly with their inlaws, are meant to make them timid, pliable, and obedient, and enforce the undemanding and unpaid drudgery that wifehood and motherhood can bring. (Yes, I know they can also be fulfilling roles, don't start jumping, all you wives and mothers; you all know that marriage involves years of slave labour too!) There's nothing intrinsically virtuous about staying on at one's in-law's place if one is feeling humiliated or unloved. It is in the nature of things for humans to return to the parental fold in times of stress or emotional need; that a daughter-in-law "shouldn't" do so, and should, instead, continue to stay on surrounded by hostile or unsympathetic people when she most feels the need for her blood relatives, is just one more unequal patriarchal stricture that aims at quelling female dissent and female reliance on support systems outside the marital home. Of course, one may distinguish between reasonable and unreasonable returns to the mayka, but disapproving of it in blanket terms is playing into the hands of patriarchy. As is commending Vandu's values in silently enduring sexual or psychological abuse. Though I do fully agree that these are, unfortunately, probably the values most evident in the milieu that PR is located in.

Edited by commentator - 15 years ago

Quote

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 15 years ago

#50

Originally posted by: Kalapi
Couldn't help but put in my 2 cents eregarding marriage. As Kools mentioned there are 2 types of hindu marriage - Court: where you sign legal docs, here u don't have to put sindoor or manglasutra ( just because legal courst don;t recognize these - these are done mostly for mental peace for the participant - not a legal requirement by any Court in Indian land).

The second is the hidu marriage where marriage has to take place in front of "Fire'. Those who have immigarted into Canada and USA could know that these pics are supplied to the immigartion office as proof of hindu marriage. I haven't heard anywhere that there is a need for society to be present. This is why hindu marriages are hard to proof and most parents will go for both the court marriage and the vedic marriage to be sure all aspects are covered. Also, in the eastern states like Bengal, Assam don't use mangalsutra rather they wear a iron bangle in their left wrist as their sign of married life. So, generalizing it that for vedic marriage, mangalsutra, sindoor and court docs are needed is JUST wrong.

My parents didn't have courst docs - believe me the marriage is valid and well.....most people go both courst and vedic marriages just to cover all front and in a way Christian marriages are better documented just because they sign those paper......

Of course, maharastrian marriages might be different....different regions are unique to certain extent although being under the same umbrella of HINDUISM...

thanks,

My dear by society I mean PROOF . U urself said in Canada and USA pictures need to be supplied to immigration office ...........what does that mean ? Proof , right ? Dont gather the whole 'SOCIETY" ..a very vague term , But at least two witnesses and photographer or priest who marries is needed or no ? Who will recognise a marraige not done in front of witnesses .............it will just be a private thing betweeen man and woman then ....whether they r putting sindoor or just tying a holy thread or exchanging a ring or simply sleeping with each other and 'feeling married in their heart' .who knows ? And see the society they r showing ........traditional Marathi society in Mumbai ...........where I hail from . No one will recognise the marraige ARMAN did ..on some lakeside in front of an idol with sindoor ...........just one pinch of sindoor ........nothing else , a smile and DONE ? How RIDICULOUS is that ? If Sindoor is marraige , Manav had put sindoor in Shravnis maang too .....was that a marraige ? Then Next day he had put sindoor in Archnas maang in temple .was THAT a marraige ? Or is putting sindoor today a marraige ? ALL 3 r most categorically nOT MARRAIGES . Hindu marraiges r done in Vedic way or court way ............the amount of people doesnt matter but witnesses have to be there . They divorced in front of thousands of people and r marrying in front of none ..........how stupid is that ? From DIVORCEE status Manav and Archna r going towards NOT PROPERLY MARRIED STATUS . If they live like this , it will be LIVE IN RELATIONSHIP , bas .NO MARRAIGE .

And yes , I REPEAT .............MANGALSUTRA IS MAIN IN MARATHI MARRAIGE . We dont recognise sINDOOR FILLING .KUNKU Is APPLIED BETWEEN EYEBROWS BUT MANGALSUTRA IS MAIN .

Quote

1 ... 3 4 5 6 7

Kool's Commentary : Slap Special - Page 5

Related Topics

Explore Topics