Kool's Commentary : Oct 6 PR - Page 12

Frankly, frankly and frankly speaking.

1. I disagree to your 'glorification' of ordinary characters like Shravni or Dharmesh and the methods employed thereon. I don't disagree to slam the leads, in fact would merrily join you on some points, but the tactics employed there, well from my point of view, are not consistent to a fair paradigm when in competition to earlier mentioned 'glorification/sympathy'.

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

1. I disagree to your 'glorification' of ordinary characters like Shravni or Dharmesh and the methods employed thereon. I don't disagree to slam the leads, in fact would merrily join you on some points, but the tactics employed there, well from my point of view, are not consistent to a fair paradigm when in competition to earlier mentioned 'glorification/sympathy'.

😊 But they are my opinions . What should i do when someone disagrees so strongly with them ............stop voicing them ? Mould them to suit the other person's opinions ? or better still ..........not voice them at all ? Just bcoz they r not POPULAR opinions ? . Is it a compulsion that I should love Archana the heroine ? Is it a compulsion that I should love Manav the hero ? Is it a compulsion that I should hate Dharmesh and Shravani and if I don't I am glorifying 'ordinary characters' and 'slamming leads' ? Why should it be glorifying ? Can't it be simply my opinion of what I see from MY perspective ? The name of this very popular thread is Kool's Commentary ............My comments ! They needn't be anyone else's , I have no complaints about anyone else 's comments at all ! .

Stand Scared

I have asked punishment for Dharmesh .......I have objected to the slapping in a delicate relationship like jeeju saali ...........it goes against traditional Marathi culture ! This is my opinion .........albeit old fashioned , it stands ! Where does glorification of Dharmesh come here ?

. I admire Shravani for carrying the baby to term without aborting it for fear of society ..............I also admire her for adjusting in a chawl life and bearing it out for two years inspite of being accustomed to a rich lifestyle ! Thats my feeling as I watch the show ! Her womanly tiffs with Archu don't interest me or affect me in the least ............they are part and parcel of a medley of emotions ! I cannot HATE Shravani simply coz she has womanly spats with the lead !

Stand instructed

.

I cannot ADORE the leads coz i see a spate of intensely foolish decisions glorified by CVS as something GREAT ! For instance a lot of hoo haa is made about Dharmesh's guilt but very little is being said about Archu signing papers without even bothering to READ them ! If Dharmesh is indeed rotten ..........rotten people will NOT be succesful if we do simple basic day to day things efficiently ..........like READING PAPERS BEFORE SIGNING ! Let message go out to ordinary public who watch it that lovely Archu's actions should oh so nOT be emulated ! Show a Judge's reprimand in court to the LEad when she stands to tell him that her signatures were tricked ! Let us see him saying ........WERE U SLEEPING WHEN U SIGNED ? WERE U DRUNK ? WHO GAVE U THE POST OF ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISOR ? Im daily asking CVS to show this reprimand ! These are my thoughts ! Why should I change them so that they suit popular opinion ? .

Stand educated

I am not voicing them coz I want to be DIFFERENT as against popular opinion and attract attention ! What TACTICS have i employed , I don't know and if others think I have , I don't care ! There r no tactics ! These are simply my opinions which i voice with a semi humorous satire that makes members laugh and indulge in lively debate , thats all ! The numbers that agree with me are much more than those who disagree ! If some disagree ...........they have a clear option ..........Don't press like button of my commentary thread ! For me its That simple !

Stand Silenced

.

My commentary is for CVS ! Not to change popular opinion ! I love Grey characters I don't like black and white characters .......they r unreal ! My commentary is for spotting these grey characters and using them to improvise the leads ! That I leave to CVs !

Expecting me to change my opinions is intellectual nepotism ............not that you did it but I have had experience with some and I merely wish to state that here ! And if i don't change my opinions saying that my 'tactics' have been noticed and disapproved of is again the same !

I respect you and your intellect . Wouldnt dream of criticising your love for Archana's character ..........thats entirely your prerogative and opinion ! But I wouldn't dream of changing my opinion about her behaviour to suit anyone's feelings on this forum either .

By all means visit , disagree and continue to think of me as a friend ! I will do the same with u coz I would be stupid to lose so valuable a contact over such trifling a matter as a TV serial discussion .

But not leaving without being 'stood' befriended...with deletion of 'to think' from the underlined above, with a rectified version- 'continue of me as a friend...'- with some rights to prick you sometimes in 'disagreements'.

P.S. i miss your 'like' button on a certain post on pafe 14- not fair-not good- not happy....😆

Originally posted by: -SD-

Hi Kool

No Doubt it's a beautiful commentary as always. But I have a feeling you are now biased.

I also do not justify the slap. rather I want to advoacte for 10 slaps and 20 'laats'. Dharmesh was the guy solely responsible for all that happened. Machine could have been dismantled much before. Secondly, the management knows Prakash very well and his enemity towards manav. But still they trusted him. Forget all these, how can you put someone behind the bars only to save your butt. and moreoever, archu slapped dharmu as he called her rishta a badnaam rishta. it may be a badnaam rishta, but who is Dharmu to intervene in Archu's personal matters?

I don't say whatever Archana has done till date is justified, but at this point of time I must say she should send dharmu and co behind the bars. congrats archu.

satyameva jayate.

Originally posted by: SaffyFlower

Ok,letz start from the start

Ajit entered and accused Archu of implicating Manav falsely -brave

Archu turns around immediately and accuses Dhammu of implicating Manav falsely-no,no she shud not point out a grave injustice? She shud immediately take an auto go to lawyer,go to police or just keep quiet?What is the diff between wat she did and ajit did?they questioned injustice.

If Tarun had found out and come to accuse the Ks -still brave -and he is no bro,BIl or gay partner.

If chawl cat,any other factory worker or even shinde the peon had found out and accused Dhammu it wud be brave,but archu who loves Manav,shud just not feel a thing about an injustice done to him??

WHO DECIDES WHO CAN POINT OUT AN INJUSTICE AND WHO CANNOT?

LAW AND ORDER IS EVERYBODY'S DUTY.That is why this country is going to the dogs.Just stand around and watch injustice,when that injustice one day come and knocks on UR own door,then scream this world is bad.

Dhammu did a PUBLIC CRIME,its not his family drama going on any more.

After all,Satish now was on the verge of telling Archu himself.Why?Who is Manav to him?Gay partner or wat??Why is he showing concern and gets appreciated for it??

Everybody in the world has a right to call Dhammu and Jay and Satish unjust for trying to implicate Manav @this pt.Let him put up his defence that his family mattered,so he did it - Satish is saying that too.I am not saying ppl dont save their butts @others expense,but is it wrong?Yes it is,that is wat the law says.

If Archu had sided with her sisters like Sulo,it wud be justified,in case she decides to expose the conspiracy to free an innocent man,it is also justified. Such is the position right now.

And as a damaad,Dhammu insulted his in-laws,put archu's sagaai in jeopardy by accusing her of badnaam rishta in front of them.Was that right?He cud have told Sulo and Damo in private if he had genuine concern.But he used the words to silence Archu's questions,as usual he manipulated the situation,put himself above all.He hit below the belt,she hit him back.Tit for tat.So much for everybody being feminist here.Although I DONT subscribe to physical thappads by anybody,verbal thappad was deserving then.

Dhammu asked - well,there is no evidence that manav is innocent,so why he cannot be considered guilty?

Manju taunted savita with the same thing -u r son murdered 2 guys,any proof he dint?Everybody was accusing Manju of being evil.How was Dhammu's statement different than hers?? Then praise Manju na.

Savita can feel aggrieved on Manju's statement bcoz he is son but archu being in love cannot defend against the same point?History has proved a mashooka's junoon in love is also powerful as a mother's love to her son,even a friend can have junoon of be-intehaan dosti,which is wat Ajit feels now.

Now if u want to debate why archu loves manav,the love tap shud open and close only when marriage tap opens and closes,I will take it up on a different post.Love is an unsurmountable emotion,which is why love marriages are common -the love happens bfor marriage,marriage happening is not even confirmed when the love happens.Widows love their husbands even after he physically does not exist.

And even Tarun caring for his friend is love.Archu caring for Manav is love.Love is love,it comes from the heart with no rules,the only string attached is the degree of caring.

When Savita caught satish and archu in the office together,and accused her as bachalan,Archu gave her a royal sounding.Satish took Archu aside and told her - words become important only when u choose to give importance.He himself ignored Savita's taunts and told Archu its not worth calling names back.But unfortunately they showed Savita turning a new leaf,resurrected her after the Rassi-Ghunghroo event,and savita turns miss goody 2 shoes just like Ajit turned mr.goody 2 shoes.Archu forgives ppl who apparently turn over a new leaf.

Originally posted by: anu rulz

sumthng i wud like to say abt the bold...the machine was not dismantled bt there was a huge placard in frnt of the infamous machine which stated in hindi and english both,tht this machine was defective and there is danger..and tho logic in soaps is rarer thn wolman syndrome,in reality the management is NOT liable or responsible for what happened..so actuall the whole kissa of "who is responsible" is hogwash..the people who died were the ones who were responsible..

secondly,i agree totally abt everyone believing prakash as tho he has suddenly sprouted a halo arnd his head,bt like i said,logic is rare..everyone seems to have short term memory abt prakash and manav's tiffs..😆

thirdly,dharmu is actually noone to interfere in archana's matters bt he IS her sister's husband,and coz of her short-sightedness,now the only sister who was truely happy in her married life has also joined the others in their wierded out ones..the thing is tht archana shows her anger selectively,which I personally dnt like..the attitude of upar ko kiss-ass karo and neeche ko kato is irritating..she has taken lot worse frm savita and manju bt raises her hand on dharmu..y?because till date,he has been nothing bt polite to her?even when she had set out to screw his company over wid her 'emotions' he has very politely told her where she has gone wrong.i totally agree abt dharmu having done a crime and shud be punished,bt archana is not a judge in the court of law..and she has no business going arnd slapping people..my POV😃