Kool's Commentary : Oct 5 PR - Page 5

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Niki Dharmu has talked about workers to Satish . He also admitted about his own butt .He was very very frank .He said . 1] We r innocent and given a choice of his butt over mine I wud choose mINE anyday . 2] He today bluntly said We have to cOMPROMISE on our MORALS at times . 3] He told Satish ............thousands will be rendered jobless coz of this one manav .We have money , we can feed his family , can he feed ours ? . Dharmu is frankly NOT NOBLE . Frank and forthright . Unashamed of not being mAHAAN . . As far as ur justification of Archus anger making her thoughtless is concerned goes ..........she has behaved OVER thoughtless in past few weeks . And no , her apology WONT change anything .Some Damages r never healed . They wont show it for long time .Even the Manav fiasco was shown upwardly healed ...Sulo calling him beta etc , but SAvita that day brot up old issues and called Archu Panoti .Im telling , SLAPS r not good . They SHUD BE GIVEN ONLY WHEN U INTEND TO TOTALLY BREAK WITH THAT PERSON .

Kools, the day this episode was shown you called Dharmesh a master manipulator. And I agree with that day's view rather than todays. He was trying to hook Satish by giving workers vaasta cos he knows Satish has a decent heart.

I frankly don't take those things that he says to Satish into consideration. I consider only that much that he says to Jaywant. He is open to Jay, not Satish.

@sherma: I NEVER said Archana is right. I only considered her situation- the guy she loves has been thrown in jail and on the verge of being given third degree torture, and can die. And then the person responsible gives bad excuse, who wouldn't lose temper????

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

Kools, the day this episode was shown you called Dharmesh a master manipulator. And I agree with that day's view rather than todays. He was trying to hook Satish by giving workers vaasta cos he knows Satish has a decent heart.

I frankly don't take those things that he says to Satish into consideration. I consider only that much that he says to Jaywant. He is open to Jay, not Satish.

Archana was at a loss for words, she wants to be honest with Jaywant but not like this. She was caught off guard by the guests

but why is court case better than slapping?..that will also get relations in trouble..kools..😕

Originally posted by: archanamanav

but why is court case better than slapping?..that will also get relations in trouble..kools..😕

Good point.

Resilient Kools 👏 Laughed all the way while reading the commentary. i love how you pointed out the slapping spree that Archu takes on each and every time mannu is in trouble. Goodness.....

Tanya Di, you are sweet as ever with your comments. loved your comment on Varsha, she used to be my fav....until she started being mean to Satish.

@Varsha, you know, i want to what is Jay thinking...and on top of that how does a father in law say something like that to his damaad to be....i just find the whole explaining Archu to Jay very bizarre, when Mannu is the subject of discussion.😒

thats it for today Gundis enjoy the evening.

@nikitagmc

@sherma: I am myself saying Archana is wrong. I NEVER SAID SHE IS RIGHT. So why are you justifying yourself again and again?????

I agree slapping was wrong. I agree Vaishu can have problems. I agree to EVERYTHING!!!!

I just said- in extreme anger people sometimes do wrong things. It is understandable.

And please lets not get into why-she-divorced-him-if-she-loves-him so- much. That is another topic. My point is only- when a loved one is tortured to such an extent and you get angry suddenly bcos of it then no one sits and thinks about all this- right, wrong, valid, invalid and all. Its an impulse bas. If Archana was still married to Manav and then this whole thing had happened, then her slapping would have been justified kya? Nahi na? So why bring up the 'why-did-she-divorce-him' issue now????

I think I should really stop this discussion here. I guess I'm not explaining myself well, cos I'm having to repeat the same point in every post.

And please lets not get into why-she-divorced-him-if-she-loves-him so- much. That is another topic. My point is only- when a loved one is tortured to such an extent and you get angry suddenly bcos of it then no one sits and thinks about all this- right, wrong, valid, invalid and all. Its an impulse bas. If Archana was still married to Manav and then this whole thing had happened, then her slapping would have been justified kya? Nahi na? So why bring up the 'why-did-she-divorce-him' issue now????

btw sherma , I agree with each word .Very valid observations !