Originally posted by: rightchoice
Yes, I do agree companies takes such measures but only when they ran out of other options. No company will remove workers just like that. Here it was shown Company is doing well and what not, Company is planning a big Ganapathi 'Celebrations'. Does it really justify removing the workers at one end and partying at the other end....? Moreover, the machine has not yet arrived in the company. No one has tested its production capability.Yes.It does.Ganapathi celebrations is a short term investment.Paying salary to extra 15-20 labourers every month is loss in the long term.And company doin well doesnt mean Dharmesh wud sit back and enjoy.If they had other options,I think Satish or Dharmesh or Archana wud hav suggested it.Since no one did,I assume there is none.As for the testing of the machines etc go,CVs hav not shown anything concrete on this yet,so no comments.
But still it did not answer firing Manav. He was as productive as anyone can be, he was sincere and has a reputation that he is the best in the field.There is a difference between being productive for a company and being productive in general.Manav is clearly not anymore productive to the company.
Ajit having an educational degree is not the alternative I was talking about. He has got injured at the workplace. He was not paid any compensation too. Will any company 'hire' him when he goes and asks job with his 'injured' hand?Do u see him handicapped?No.He's good enuf to work anywhere else.
By the way, we are talking about workers not 'white collar' jobs. These workers work for their life in the same company doing same kind of low level job. Their experience rarely fits in another company.
I'm sorry u misunderstood me.I was very much talking about workers.My cousin is one in one of the factories in Mumbai.What I said is what he faces out there...at ground zero level.
So Dharmesh has to pay them for not doing any work? NO. He could do many of the following
Consider them using them for other work in the company.
If company is growing big, keep them for future use.
If they have to be removed them,
Give them severity compensation.
Give them enough time to look out for job.
Give them a prep training so that they are ready to go out.Dharmesh has not been shown to be not doing the above things.When he does,I'll comment.As of now,Manav has not cited any of these reasons.Neither has rasika.
You may ask, why would company spend money on these? Yes companies have to because those workers have worked and were part of success of the company and it's existence. Just because it is a private sector it doesn't give them free pass to fire at will.
I am not saying, Dharmesh should keep them as a charity but he acted as a mean business owner than a practical one...that's my point.Truly mean business men wont bother breaking 4-5 bones of hero Manav.Dharmesh is fair and practical not mean.Manav called him ganwar and yet he has not taken any action against him.He is not taking out any personal vendatta and is being fair within his rights.Thats my point.