I agree the married couple starting their lives out of the interferance of parents may help them develop a healthy relationship. But what about those parents who might be needing the support of their children? 😕
If there are rules in the joint family which regulate the relationship between everyone in the house , their responsibilities, and their privacy ..isn't it possible that such families may live comfortible, and don't have to loose the love and warm of living with the extended family? ..maybe working women can get help in taking care of their children from their mother, sisters in law?😕
Parents shouldn't be thinking of their kids as their default retirement investment. If they can, they should secure their future retirement days without having to depend on anyone. And i mean it in a nice way, trust me. Parents are, in our culture, over sacrificing. No parent needs to carry the burden of their 25 yr old jobless useless child and deplete their savings and energy. They spend their all lives rearing kids, giving up on small happiness, retirement is when they are set free. To relax and enjoy stress free lives.
But God forbid, if their health or financial status is not letting them do so, kids need to step up and take care of them. This is a natural thing to do, with or without joint family.
Coming to helping hand with kids for working couples, from my observation, parenting ideas definitely differ from generation to generation. Because in our culture people believe that "age = wisdom", grandparents tend to just follow what they did with their own kids irrespective of how the parents feel. There are no boundaries, everyone wants to enforce their beliefs. And more often than not one of the key caregivers which is child's mother or child's grandmother (because in ojr cultures dads usually do nothing🙄) , one will have to compromise. And many such compromises over the years leads to unpleasant energy and equation.
Coming to the point where there are rules to maintain the peace of the household. Usually any kitchen related rules will ne made by the senior most lady in the family and all other rules will be made the oldest male member. If they fail to see the views of the younger generation, at least 1 person in the family will be suppressed by every such rule evem if it is based on majority support. Imagine if rule of the household is only sarees or suits in the house and 1 out of 5 bahus wants to wear a nightdress, but she can't. Majority doesn't mean everyone is equally happy. What if one couple wants to go out, eat and have fun outside more than others. They can't do that, as per their liking, without offending someone.
Two is company, three is crowd. Living in a joint family means giving up on lot of yoir personal freedom amd choices to keep the household running smoothly.
1.2k