Nayi Soch? Really? - Page 68

Originally posted by: nuttycleo

dont tell me Ujjaini/Jen...the whole "hate Amar" saga strikes again in so much as 2-3 days time!!!

Originally posted by: Jen_IloveAR

LOL its so funny how the kids on the forum have such a puraani soch in some things... I wonder how their relationship is

Originally posted by: appu_12

Hey just read abt the" I hate amar " saga. Tough its just the precap, though I am Amar fan and though we are yet to see excatly what happens but I also felt that one line of the precap ' will you be happy if you marry Anant?' not so appropriate. In my POV its a wrong way of framing the question. I fully understand Amar POV, being a mentor he wud want navya to be professionally well settled, they are too tender for marriage, but whether she will be happy with Anant is a little out of context. Maybe when we hear the whole of it in the episode things will be more clear as to why he said that particular dialogue.

What say u, friends!

Originally posted by: sajni786

ahhh...finally I see the old flavor of navya in today's epi...
A truly n sincerely written script and thats why it comes out on the screen so beautifully...

The debate at bajpayees was indeed worth watching...n one where to some extent...bajpayees were not wrong!!! They are right when they say "rishta nibhana is something that gets engraved in u with the types of sanskaar bestowed upon u"...VERY VERY VERY TRUE!!!

Each family functions differently n have differently ideologies...the child raising will see ...observe n learn only that amount of harshness that he/she has seen growing up...and the amount of tolerance n patience level that can sustain u in the given harshness is also directly proportional to the environment u are brought up in...for eg. in family A , child 1 has seen her parents have verbal fights to an extent that scream, shout and curse each other...and the next day...they move on as if nothing has happened...the child will adapt to this routine as "normal" and will not see as a threat in future during her relationship...but similarly...in family B, child 2 have never witnessed her parents even arguing per saying and thus the word "argument" itself becomes alien to child 2 and can impose a major threat in her relationship in future.
So basically its all about the type of environment...the teachings of ur elders...n the observations that u make living in that envrionment as well as outside gives a person a certain broadband of thots n pool of ides with which they function in relationships.

However...Anant's counter attack wasnt wrong either...His basic argument surrounded the "x-factor" of relations...x-factor meaning...the unknown...the unexpected...the out of norm...How wud u have dealt had something totally disastrous happened in the relation where the husband is wanting to kill the wife...abduct the kid...cheat on ur daughter n have the nerve to physically abuse her!!!
This is where bajpayees cannot justify their paramparas coz they themselves have not been that harsh with their daughters or bahus and thus cannot fanthom such a situation!!

I think...it was a give n take debate...where both were not entirely correct...but not entirely wrong as well!!

ahhh...after long I gave my analysis!!!😆

Yes dear its valid point. These day divorces are happening in blink of an eye. These days women divorces hubby for his snoring and man divorces wife as there is less salt in biriyani. But if the sanskars a re upbringing are good that person can over come this and she/he will try maximum to keep the relation