Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 2 - Page 129

Originally posted by: NoraSM

I think we have to go to sanskrit text now 🤣 because KMG has added name of Rukmini there, Can you check if "Sachi" or "Rukmini" are mentioned in this part?

And a portion of Sri herself became incarnate on earth, for the gratification of Narayana, in the line of Bhishmaka. And she was by name the chaste Rukmini

Either CE edited Rukmini's portion or KMG added it

gaṇas tv apsarasāṃ yo vai mayā rājan prakīrtitaḥ

tasya bhāgaḥ kṣitau jajñe niyogād vāsavasya ca

94 tāni ṣoḍaśa devīnāṃ sahasrāṇi narādhipa

babhūvur mānuṣe loke nārāyaṇa parigrahaḥ

95 śriyas tu bhāgaḥ saṃjajñe ratyarthaṃ pṛthivītale

drupadasya kule kanyā vedimadhyād aninditā

Sanskrit CE calls Panchali Shri. So Debroy sir translated correctly. No Rukmini mentioned.

Originally posted by: Andy3456

I want to read the Shiva Trilogy by Amish Tripathi.

Its a good read, I couldn't complete it 😆

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

\

gaṇas tv apsarasāṃ yo vai mayā rājan prakīrtitaḥ

tasya bhāgaḥ kṣitau jajñe niyogād vāsavasya ca

94 tāni ṣoḍaśa devīnāṃ sahasrāṇi narādhipa

babhūvur mānuṣe loke nārāyaṇa parigrahaḥ

95 śriyas tu bhāgaḥ saṃjajñe ratyarthaṃ pṛthivītale

drupadasya kule kanyā vedimadhyād aninditā

Sanskrit CE calls Panchali Shri. So Debroy sir translated correctly. No Rukmini mentioned.

Now people believe. It. I rest my case. That sums it up.

Originally posted by: NoraSM

I am definitely going to hell 🤣

The man is Hawt ❤️❤️❤️😍

"Stop Thinking"

😆 Have you read Krishna's description by Vyasa? Biceps like mountains, voice like thunder.

Aaj kal ke men simply don't compare well. But then, I'm no Panchali😆

163 😳 Bhai log, this thread has reached the page limit, please move onto the new thread.

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/mahabharat/5165390/mahabharat-retelecast-discussion-thread-3

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

\

gaṇas tv apsarasāṃ yo vai mayā rājan prakīrtitaḥ

tasya bhāgaḥ kṣitau jajñe niyogād vāsavasya ca

94 tāni ṣoḍaśa devīnāṃ sahasrāṇi narādhipa

babhūvur mānuṣe loke nārāyaṇa parigrahaḥ

95 śriyas tu bhāgaḥ saṃjajñe ratyarthaṃ pṛthivītale

drupadasya kule kanyā vedimadhyād aninditā

Sanskrit CE calls Panchali Shri. So Debroy sir translated correctly. No Rukmini mentioned.

So KMG chomu goofed up once again 😅

Thank You for the Citation and Sanskrit version

This confirms Draupadi was Sri's (Goddess Laxmi) incarnation

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

\

gaṇas tv apsarasāṃ yo vai mayā rājan prakīrtitaḥ

tasya bhāgaḥ kṣitau jajñe niyogād vāsavasya ca

94 tāni ṣoḍaśa devīnāṃ sahasrāṇi narādhipa

babhūvur mānuṣe loke nārāyaṇa parigrahaḥ

95 śriyas tu bhāgaḥ saṃjajñe ratyarthaṃ pṛthivītale

drupadasya kule kanyā vedimadhyād aninditā

Sanskrit CE calls Panchali Shri. So Debroy sir translated correctly. No Rukmini mentioned.

Was Draupadi called Anindita

Originally posted by: Andy3456

Was Draupadi called Anindita

It only means she was faultless. Perfection is what Vyasa meant I think

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

It only means she was faultless. Perfection is what Vyasa meant I think

Ohh ☺️. I wish she was called 😁

Originally posted by: Mages

As per The Garuda Purana, she was theincarnation of Bharati Devi, the consort of Lord Vayu. The Narada and Vayu Puranas portray Draupadi as the composite avatar of Goddesses Shyamala (wife of Dharma), Bharati (wife of Vayu), Sachi (wife of Indra) and Usha (wife of Ashwinis).

here something i find abt draupadi incarnation and this is according garuda purana...

I have not read garudra puran anyone read about it can shed some light on it

so if its true this sums up yudishtir bhim arjuna nakul-sahadev they married their own wives in form of draupadi