Karna: Does He Deserve So Much Respect??[DT Note Page 15] - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

371

Views

40k

Users

46

Likes

1.5k

Frequent Posters

riti4u thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 11 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: Paro95

@niva big hug dearie...this is precisely how i feel but was feeling to lazy to type i guess we hv some pichle jaman ka naata😉

@riti agreed pandavas were at fault too specially yudi. He ws d main culprit of being soo gulliable to hv been lured into the game by shakuni. Regarging BANS,wat i feel is that they have lost their father n the only person who could fill that void was their elder bro. Throughout their lives yudi treated them as his childrn rather than brothers. So considering the sensitivity of relationships during dwapara yug,i guess there was no chance that they could hv disobeyed their elder brother. Yaa u cn argue that dusshy ws also obeyin his bro by disrobing drau, here it comes to the difference of the mindsets of yudi n duri, one is sheer saintly stupidity n other is evil power hungry cruelity. Plus i guess this issue is a conflict between swadharma n adharma which i guess will be more clear post geeta.
N regarding redemption yaa pandavas did redeem themselves. God is not partial. He gave evrybdy the chance but they dint see it. The one who worked hard,faced hardships got the divine knwledge is taunted of being the so called favorite...
Coming back to karna, i m really srry but i have never heard that he stayed on wid duri cos he wanted to redeem by choosing the loosing side. I always heard that he really did beleive in duris cause n stayed back because of his trust n indebtness to his frnd.if otherwise, i wld be egar to see the citations.
When i meant that choosing to be in loosing side was his redemption. I didnt mean that he stick to loosing side for that reason. He stayed on dury side for loyality thats true, but he had the chance of getting kingdom and giving it to dury which he refused...isnt that strange that he refused that ..which could clearly help his friend...
here is citation for above statement i made-
" If king Yudhishthira, of virtuous soul and well-controlled senses, cometh to know me as the firstborn son of Kunti, he will never accept the kingdom. If, again, O slayer of Madhu, this mighty and swelling empire becometh mine. I shall, O repressor of foes, certainly make it over to Duryodhana only. Let Yudhishthira of virtuous soul become king for ever. He that hath Hrishikesa for his guide, and Dhananjaya and that mighty car-warrior Bhima for his combatants, as also Nakula and Sahadeva, and the sons of Draupadi, is fit, O Madhava, to rule over the whole earth."
And yaa some ppl also say he was sorry n apologised to her aftr he found out she was his SIL. But wat b4 that?? Hadnt he caused pain to her b4 that n why feel remorse only wen u find out the true relation...
But still having said all this i agree that there are respectable sides to his personality, but imo they dont compensate fr the adharma

for full conversation between Karna and Krishna you can refer this post by Sabhyata.
Edited by riti4u - 11 years ago
TheWatcher thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#22

Originally posted by: Arijit007

the watcher, yup, he consulted with karna indeed, but i have no idea why karna goes with every evil idea of durry? why he didn't tried to stop him? because of friendship?



Good question, I think Karna never considered himself to be equal to Duryodhana, hence he never tried to correct him. if you read his later conversations, he frequently said that he knew Duryodhana was wrong in every step of his life. The reason I provided can be used - though with a pinch of salt.
Shriya95 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#23
Thanks fr d citation riti...it clearly shws that he knew yudi wld b a bettr king than himself or duri...
Again as i said...some of his aspects r respectable. Nw it upto the individual to make the choice. The obsession comes wen ppl start to get confused between d actors n characters n start bashing without thinking twice or refering d epic which is happning in many places of social media...
amritat thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#24

Originally posted by: riti4u

😊

good to read your view on character Karna. You stated all those reasons for which Karna is infamous and famous for.
everyone has their own likes and dislikes from epic. Some are induced from the way various people have introduced characters to us in their own way of understanding it.
I connected to Karna from childhood with a poem that i read in school and he sort of became a character that I was curious to know about... Right or wrong? Probably I was too young to understand it then😊.. but indeed he made his way to this heart .. Honestly speaking when I started liking him..I had no clue of his role in draupadi's VH ... Probably if I had known initially may be I might have not respected him that much... He was definately wrong there and there is no doubt about that...then why do i respect him and love him so much ..reason is because I kind of try to understand this complex character and depth in him rather than just focussing on what he uttered the day when even righteous ones were wrong ...
Was he jealous of Arjun? Well , I dont call that jealousy... may be he had this urge of proving his capabilities which otherwise were degraded in society in name of his lower caste... Again this is an interpretation which might vary from person to person...
We do sympathise with draupadi during VH incident.. all of us despite of our preferences in character...but does anyone sympathise with that man who too felt like being disrobed in rangbhoomi .. I am surely not equating things here...definately not... but if 100 % sympathies are given to draupadi... why cant we even give 5% of that to a person who just probably only wanted respect... Respect ? Respect is what he asked for... he never asked for a kingdom.. True respect is what he was disrobed of...that day..and when duryodhana stood up for him that day..we can surely understand why was he so devoted in this friendship..
As you said ..his deeds in the end surpassed his wrong doings .. he could have very easily given kingdom offered to him to duryodhana...But he knew he was wrong...isnt that redemption itself...
Anyways I think i wrote quite long reply here... but I would just say... He deserves respect which he never got in his lifetime...Atleast his death gives him that respect...

Thank u for commenting on my post.
Yes, indeed the likes and dislikes for a certain character depends on how we start reading about it.
U seem to be very sentimental about Karna, just like I am about Draupadi.
Yes Draupadi's Vastraharan was one day, when all the "righteous" people like Yudisthir, Bhishm, etc made mistakes. Some committed mistakes by talking and some by remaining silent.
But the way Karna, jumped in, when Vikarna was trying to defend Draupadi, is something I don't like.
And speaking of Ranbhoomi incident, I want to say one thing, which I did not write here, bcoz this post was supposed to respect Karna.
You see, in that Ranbhoomi, apart from Bhima, I do not really find anyone to be at fault as such.
From what I have understood, that competition was supposed to be a "family affair".
Now, Arjun was winning, and getting a lot of cheers, when suddenly an intruder came in, and forcefully wanted to establish himself as a superior warrior.
He said that "I can do all those things that Arjun can do."
With Drone's permission, he did prove himself.
However, then he challenges Arjun, to prove himself better. Now, certainly he wanted to prove a point.
But it cannot be denied that it was very insulting for Arjun. He felt insulted, that as he was gaining popularity(which any normal human being enjoys), suddenly an intruder came in, and challenged him. That is y he got angry, and in the heat of the moment said, "I will kill u", to which Karna replied with equal aggression saying that, "I will kill u too."
Please remember, that the norms of the society was different then. Caste-System played a very important role.
Living in 21st Century, it is very easy to say that "he only wanted respect".
But in those days, respect was earned, in terms of caste, and not talent.
I know it was wrong and unfair, but that is exactly how it was.
And it was not easy for people to get beyond the norms of the contemporary society. People feared religion, and practised caste system rigidly.
Even today, is it very easy to break norms? Easier said than done.
Duryodhan could do it, bcoz he had a secret agenda in his mind, that is, he finally found someone to counter Arjun.
However, Karna's life changed, thanks to Duryodhan's agenda. So, Karna had every right to be on his friend's side in times of need. I do not blame him for that.
I just don't like how he supports Duryodhan's misdeeds as well.
So, u are right. Karna was insulted on that day, but he, too, intruded into an occasion, where he was not invited.
Why was he so desperate to get respect?
He certainly had suffered a lot for his caste, and he wanted to prove a point.
However, the way he chose to gain that respect, was not right, if not wrong. Or atleast so I feel.
As for his "jealousy" for Arjun , well it is written in the Adi Parva, that at Drone's Gurukul, Karna disliked Arjun. Whether that was "jealousy" or "proving a point", that is upto the reader.
Please don't feel offended, but this is my opinion. If I have offended u then I apologize. Please do not mind. 😊
And thank u again for reading my long post, and commenting on it. 😊
riti4u thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 11 years ago
#25
this can be never ending debate Amrita if we try to counter every argument in favor or against karna, thus would only say that I am glad that you voiced out your opinion on character. I like honest views and respect that. There is nothing to feel offended about..
here a big hug to you..🤗
I too like draupadi's character and do write when needed to voice for her sake ..but indeed I am more emotional about Karna,may be will put in words sometime why 😳 . He is human character with flaws of its own..yet in his own way he is respectable.. that is what my final take is... 😊
@paro95- absolutely respecting your thoughts on character. You know one of my favorite actor once remarked "It is perfectly human to be hated at times"😊
adding further to part you mentioned about confusing between actors/characters- i dont really know more about social sites you refering too.. but for me this character always takes first precedence n then definately actor living it..but all opinions of mine are for character karna😊
Edited by riti4u - 11 years ago
amritat thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#26

Originally posted by: TheWatcher

As Vrish mentioned, Karna did not really plot with the Lakshagriha, he just went with it.

But, his hate for the Pandavas does have a reason, no hate can be one sided. After Karna matched/excelled Arjuna during the Rangbhoomi, Arjuna was angry and he took an oath of killing Karna right there, now let me think, what was the reason for this outburst?, can only Karna's outburst be highlighted?, no. below is the citation of Arjuna taking an oath.

... " Arjuna, after this, deeming himself disgraced, said unto Karna stationed amidst the brothers like unto a cliff, 'That path which the unwelcome intruder and the uninvited talker cometh to, shall be thine, O Karna, for thou shall be slain by me.'
..."

And no, Karna did not give the idea to Duryodhana to imprison Krishna, it was Duryodhana's own idea - which he consulted with Karna.

Towards the end, it was made clear by Karna that he did not wanted to humiliate the Pandavas, he could have easily done that by accepting the throne- passing it onto Duryodhana and send them to exile. He just wanted a fair fight for the world to see his prowess/valor




That's exactly what I replied to Vrish.
He was probably not the mastermind of the Lakshagriha plot, but he was involved in it.
Whether u say that "he went with it" or whether I say that "he was involved in it", either way, he was a participant.
As for Arjun's threat to Karna, well I think I explained with my own perspective to riti4u as to y I think Karna's hatred for a little too much. You can read it if u want.
Well, even if his hatred for Arjun and Bhima was justified, then wat about Yudisthir?
If I'm not mistaken, then Yudisthir did not insult Karna.
What about Kunti?
Why were they almost burnt too?
So, u see, I am not directly pointing at Karna or putting the whole blame on him. Ofcourse Duryodhan was much worse and much, much more involved in the House of Lac plotting.
Karna was only a supporter.
But the thing is, being an ex-"Karnali", I really expected a lot more from Karna. I never accuse Duryodhan for showing his thigh to Draupadi. Bcoz, he was stamped evil, mostly.
But Karna was different. And it's bcoz of this that we try to analyse "why he did this" and "why he did that". Bcoz we expect a lot from him.
Finally, thanks for taking out your time for reading this long post, and commenting on it. 😊
Edited by amritat - 11 years ago
amritat thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#27

Originally posted by: -Archu-

Amrita ,i used to read and comment on your Female centered posts and knew that you are a fan of Droupathy,Its great to know that you do have respect for Karna ...I loved your analysis,its obvious that it is from your heart.. For me Karna is the very first character ,i got attracted to in Mahabharat..At fist when i heard the stories from my grandfather as a 5 yr old child,it was kinda sympathy..

I cried hearing the story of the infant thrown to a river by his own birth mother ,the teen got rejected by his Guru in the name of his caste and the youngster who had to face questions on caste to prove his abilities...
Later it turned out to respect after reading malayalam version of MB,translation of stories like Mrityunjaya ,His place is carved on the walls of my heart as a hero...
I started reading the KMG version of MB after joining the forum and had a very similar experience to that of yours and stopped reading.. prefered to go on with my own fantacies than facts...
Thanks again for making a wonderful analysis on Karna ...

Thank you again for reading this looonnnggg post and commenting on it. 😊
Yes, I usually prefer to write on female-centric issues, coz there's a bit of a feminist in me. 😃
However, Karna has intrigued me since the last one year, and after some apprehensions, I finally decided to write something on him.
To be honest, I was extremely nervous initially. I know there are people on this forum, who are extremely sensitive about Karna, as I am about Draupadi.
So, it took me a lot of time to actually put the right words, so that I can express my opinion clearly, without hurting anyone's feelings.
I know that the "accusations" on Karna will probably not go down well with some people. However, I have tried my best to criticize him for the right reasons, and also show respect to him, where he rightfully deserves it.
Niva1 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#28
@ Amrita - I love how u put ur word across humbly without hurting anyone's sentiment. Well this was the only thing I wanted to say in this post, But the part about feminism got me.

The feminist in me holds most males in MB responsible for Drau's condition. Karna's words are talked about more, because he is right there in the middle, Pandav's ka bhai, but Dury ka dost. I can't love him, I can't hate him. But I do hate some of his acts.

What I do believe is that unless Karna fans love him while accepting that he was dead wrong in Drau's case, they are basically pulling down the feminist movement. Some things - statements or actions, should never be justified.

As far as the question about who was the better worrier among KaJu - humble debate is what I seek, but biased arguments full of hatred and rudeness is what I generally see, so I remain far away from these topics. Only because u have put it so nicely, that I decided to participate in this thread. And so far the arguments are coming in good, I hope it stays that way.
Shriya95 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#29
@riti that is clearly understood by ur posts dear that character takes the first preferance fr u n i admire that a lot...cos it is the same in my case too...my statement ws nt in particular regarding KaJu but in general...there r ppl who drag the actor while disliking the character which i feel is not healthy...theres no rule after all that since d characters hate each other fans shld also do that...ppl cn have a polite discussions on contasting views as we r having here :D
@amrita i m glad u made d post dearie...felt very nice to see it n see ppls remarks :)
amritat thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#30

Originally posted by: nuckts

i agree that draupadi' insult was very bad
but if you compare both draupadi n karna's insults you will find
drauapadi's insult is like a wound a bashing whose memories will always remain,its a hard strike bitter when going through it but it will end after sometime
whereas with karna-his insults are like slow poison whch never gives the pain of bruises but leaves its impact and it will continue till his end,and he has to face it every moment in his life though its not so extreme as drauapdi's insult but surely has a similar amount of impact in a different form😊

Thank u so much for liking and commenting on my post. 😊
Indeed Karna was a complex character, who made some mistakes, but deserves respect despite that.
As for comparing the insults of Karna and Draupadi, I think it's only a matter of perspective.
Draupadi's insult was indeed a hard blow, but I don't agree that it will "end after sometime"
Some memories stay always...do girl who get raped or molested forget that easily?
Never. Such memories torment forever.
However, I agree with u on how Karna's insult was a slow poison. Such insults sink in slowly, and hurt immensely.
As much as I love Draupadi and try to defend her actions at her Swamvar, based on social norms, her rights of rejection at her own Swamvar, I cannot deny that the whole incident was certainly insulting for Karna.
The truth is both Karna and Draupadi were right in their own ways, on that day.
One wanted an equal husband, and the other wanted respect.
Kings of those times had huge egos, and women were expected to oblige, and accept the decisions taken by men easily. However Draupadi did not oblige and spoke up. Thus, it was obvious for Karna to feel bad.
Draupadi, according to me, was not wrong in rejecting Karna. However, her "manner" was wrong. She spoke up loudly, and impulsively stating honestly the reason for rejection.
Thus unintentionally, and unknowingly, she hit the wrong chord about which Karna was most sensitive.
That infuriated Karna all the more. But the way he took revenge was wrong.
Even if we can justify his participation in the "House of Lac", Abhimanyu's killing, we cannot justify his words at Draupadi's Vastraharan.
And u are right. I find it unfair to blame Karna alone for killing Abhimanyu. Other people were responsible too. Both parties killed each other. But people only highlight Abhimanyu's killing, bcoz, he was attacked by many people at the same time. That is all.
But thanks again for commenting. 😊

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".