Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread # 9 - Page 84

1. Was teen Krishna doing trial run for Draupadi swayambara, recalling Sita's swayambara or doing weightlifting competition? 😕

Their portrayal of Krishna has been inconsistent. While the adult Krishna oscillates between being a forever in control Avatar and saying things like ' I can't predict the future through clairvoyance, I just observe people's actions and character to arrive at my predictions about the future', the teen Krishna knows exactly how an event is going to turn out. They should stick to one portrayal.

Originally posted by: Ashwini_D

Their portrayal of Krishna has been inconsistent. While the adult Krishna oscillates between being a forever in control Avatar and saying things like ' I can't predict the future through clairvoyance, I just observe people's actions and character to arrive at my predictions about the future', the teen Krishna knows exactly how an event is going to turn out. They should stick to one portrayal.

Originally posted by: shyam09

nah I think it works in favor of the whole "Krishna isn't divine" thing they are trying to put out.

See if young Krishna can predict the future and regular Krishna can't, it simply means that StarKrishna is losing his mind and memory as he ages which tells us that he is not divine and he is not God.

These people are so brilliant ... they are StarBrilliant!!😆

(that joke sounded much better in my mind ...)

I think these guys are confused whether they should show krishna a divine person or an extraordinary mortal(and invite wrath of many people all over world) . so sometimes they tend to appease audience seeing krishna as extraordinary person then return back to all knowing mighty god. and we audience too are "kanfoosed" where to put starkrishna. so it means cvs have succeeded in their attempt 😕

only those who are ignorent about the scriptures are confused by the portreyal.

Originally posted by: Arijit007

only those who are ignorent about the scriptures are confused by the portreyal.

arijit bhrata I could say it was true. many people who have read scriptures too take him as an mortal, who was really complex and tough to understand. so starbharat too seem to b oscillating between two school of thoughts. if u see episodes from start rather than making it a prime religious hindu epic they glassed over krishna divinity (or who he really is as considered by epic).

If the Krishna leela "gyaan" is supposed to be for Draupadi (& the kids), then why are the Pandavas, Subhadra, Shikhandini, DD, Virata & Sudeshna listening in on it?

Originally posted by: -Shani-

If the Krishna leela "gyaan" is supposed to be for Draupadi (& the kids), then why are the Pandavas, Subhadra, Shikhandini, DD, Virata & Sudeshna listening in on it?

And if they are not listening in, then why were they all crying after Kansa killed Devaki's first born?

Seems rather strange that Krishna leela "gyaan" is being delivered to everybody present in the Matsya court, but the Gita gyaan in Kurukshetra is an exclusive Krishnarjun convo...

I mean, in Kurukshetra, will the UpaPs & Abhimanyu suddenly become "unworthy" of knowing about concepts such as the immortality of the soul, nishkama karma, etc.? Or will it be too difficult for them to understand...

krishna seekhs were not from geeta.

Originally posted by: Arijit007

krishna seekhs were not from geeta.