Karna's statement

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Joja

@Joja

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: TheWatcher
No, he did not knew pandavas are his brothers at vastraharan, Krishna tells him just before the war, he regretted this mistake of his.

Fine he didnt know about pandava;s being his bro.

But still how could he want to see a Women disrobe in a sabah?

Quote

Joja

@Joja

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: bheegi

No, he didn't know they were his brothers till just before the war when Krishna and then Kunti tried to talk him into joining the Pandavs. He was very loyal to Duryodhana and all his actions were guided by that loyalty towards his friend. Dury's enemy was his enemy

Well, he was very loyal to Dury, but he could have kept quiet instead of making such big/bad statement.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Joja

@Joja

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: haha67re
sad but its true that he commented on Draupadi for having five husbands and blaming her for that..
What an irony..a guy who life long struggled for respect ,couldnt do the same for others...

But it is Mahabharat after all.Its hard to justify all actions of any character..Even lord is not spared ...

Karna has supported dury in many wrong things and ok agreed he was loyal to him.

But insulting a Women?

And what does he mean by whether she has clothes on her or not its fine..

I hated him more than Dury.

Another character i hated today was Dritrastra.. How could he be so cheap.

Quote

rakshaanra

@rakshaanra

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#14

he is a bitter oafish seeking revenge on a defenseless woman

real napunsak this guy

Quote

rakshaanra

@rakshaanra

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#15

even Mama Shakuni had balls to give Dhuri good advise, dont disrobe draupadi but this Karan- I have no sympathy nor praise for him anymore

Quote

bheegi

@bheegi

Stunner

+ 5

Posted: 11 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: Joja

Well, he was very loyal to Dury, but he could have kept quiet instead of making such big/bad statement.

As Draupadi said today- aap sabke dharm ka diya bujh chuka hai. That's exactly what happened that day in the sabha. I still blame her husbands more than anyone else. If they were there to protect her, no one else would have dared point fingers or say nasty things about her.

Quote

amritat

@amritat

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#17

Karna has supported dury in many wrong things and ok agreed he was loyal to him.

But insulting a Women?

And what does he mean by whether she has clothes on her or not its fine..

I hated him more than Dury.

Another character i hated today was Dritrastra.. How could he be so cheap.

Well, when Draupadi was being dragged to the court, Vikarna tried to stop that by supporting Draupadi's question about the validity of Yudisthir staking her.

At that time, Karna starts talking n silences Vikarna, by calling him immature.

Then he points out that since great men like Yudisthir n Bhism, were quiet, then it proves that Draupadi has been won.

Then he continues that if Vikarna was objecting bcoz, it is inappropriate to bring a "woman" like this to a court full of men, then clearly she is "unchaste" as she has 5 husbands. So, whether such a woman is dressed or naked, it doesn't matter. Even disrobing such a woman would not be surprising.

He then asks Dushasen to disrobe Draupadi.

Later, Karna tells Draupadi to select a master for herself. Since she had 5 husbands already, one more would not harm. N then he says, that although slaves are not allowed to choose their masters, Draupadi will be given the privilege of choosing her lord, as she was so choosy.

These are what Karna said during Draupadi's vastraharan.

His role has been minimized in the serial to make Duryodhan look like the ultimate villain. But Karna played a very significant role in Draupadi's vastraharan.

N Dhritarashtra was not a great person, but he did not say those cheap dialogues in the epic.

He was aloof throughout the Vastraharan, blindly supporting his son's misdeeds by remaining silent.

Quote

diva82

@diva82

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#18

Yes he did. He was remembering how hurt he felt from being called a "sut-putra" in front of all the warriors by Draupadi. Not that is justifies what he did, but in this mahabharat, they haven't shown Karan to be more darker, instead they have given a more darker role to Dhritistarsa. But after that, he realised how wrong he was, when he found out Pandavas were his brothers. Krishna told Karan when Krishna came as a peace envoy to Hastinapur after Pandavas exile had finished.

Edited by diva82 - 11 years ago

Quote

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#19

well unfortunately karna said all these things and in this incient karna was compeletly wrong no excuses.no matter what Draupadi said or didn't say this was no justified way of revenge .

But he paid price for his mistake by losing his life

infact i feel that day in dyut sabha everyone was wrong kauravas,karna,pandavas,bheeshm etc only draupadi was right rest all were wrong

Quote

menuvenki

@menuvenki

Beginner

Posted: 11 years ago

#20

I hate karan to the core.No woman will sure won't like him.Even though he was a great dhan veer.why he badmouth against once wife? Becoz she called sutputura in swamvar.If raja ki son rajkumar then sutu ki son sutputra hi.Then y he felt insult whether he is feeling bad for he is brought up by sutu family, so he also indirectly insult his father adhiratha and radha.

This Karna never gave good thoughts to duryodhan nor he was faithful to duryodhan by giving vachan to kunti matha..

His only thought was he want to win arjun and show the world he was great archer for that he used duryodhan friendship.