Originally posted by: srishtisingh
still drau qu would b valid if he did not have right over himself then how could he stake?
It is a paradox.
In those days (remember, we are talking of the Dwapar Yuga here), a wife WAS considered to be the husband's property, and a husband had FULL rights on his wife. But, in this particular case, the husband had already lost himself. Therefore, on technical grounds, even wifey got staked and lost as well. So, on THAT basis, Yudi had no right to stake her.
The whole matter of "Does a husband have the right to stake his own wife?" is a completely different argument which may or may not have worked in the Dwapara Yuga. I repeat, we are talking of the Dwapara Yuga.
But my question is - Is it fair to link the mayasabha incident with the dice game/vastraharan incident?
Irrespective of whoever may or may not have laughed at Duri when he fell into the water, if you look at it completely from Duri's PoV alone, he himself may have had a "reason" for his behaviour, yes - but the validity of said "reason" is certainly debatable.
After looking at what happened in the dice game/vastraharan incident, I think it was a completely OTT reaction to the "laughter" that Duri had to endure...
If you link the mayasabha incident with the dice game/vastraharan fiasco, wouldn't THAT be "justifying" the events of the dice hall? I mean, there is a difference between having a "reason" for a person's behaviour and a "justification" for the same behaviour.
Did Duri have a "reason"? From his PoV alone, I suppose so, but "validity" of said reason is certainly debatable. Was Duri's reason "justified" in the entire context of the events? No, it wasn't.
What bothers me even more is that ⭐️Bharat is ALREADY showing mamujaan wanting and plotting his way to take away IP from the Pandavas - even when it is not even an independent kingdom.
So, 85% of the blame for the events of the dice hall in ⭐️Bharat will come on mamujaan, and 10% of the blame will come on Duri for already saying "hum uske vastra utaarenge".
Awesome way to give a "reason" or "justify" the involvement of the other guilty parties...
Edited by shani88 - 11 years ago