A different question struck me...
So far, the flow had been going on events in Hastinapur, up to Drupada's defeat. Now, this is probably the time Krishna's wars w/ Jarasandha were still on, so by showing Kalyavan now, they've got the time frame right, even if showing Subhadra & Arjun w/ him is bakwas.However, if the CVs wanted to move from Hastinapur to Mathura/Dwarka, would that have sustained the interest of people here? Or would it be a case of missing Shaheer/Arav/Aham et al and enjoying SRJ/Pallavi? In other words, if they show Krishna's story in MB - including the part that's not in it, like these events, would that retain your interest?Note that in the MB, Krishna first appears @ Draupadi's swayamvara. In SB, Krishna & Balarama are on their way to Hastinapur after Saytabhama's marriage, and they hear about the house of lac. Balarama accompanies Duryodhan to Mithila & teaches him there, while Satyabhama's father Satrajit is murdered, and Satyabhama comes to Krishna for justice, and he goes after Satadhandva, Kritavarma & Akrura. In other words, it's a hit & miss, but at least, SB puts a reference b/w events in Hastinapur & Dwarka.Arjun is in no way involved in Krishna's first 3 marriages, but he did help Krishna get Kalindi. He was there to help Krishna take away Satya, and he lost to Krishna in Lakshmanaa's swayamvara, which was almost identical to Draupadi's, except that the fish couldn't be directly seen.
how did arjun lost?can u tell me the story?