Greatest Debate-who was the most powerfull warrior in MB - Page 11

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

Of-course he did... and part of Karna Parva yes.. why wont he... Karna was talking about his younger brother and mentally he was not what he was.. afterall Krishna and Kunti dint meet him to reveal his identity because they dint have anything else to do.. just a thought..

1. Krishna had stolen away his hatred and antagonism of the Pandavas.
2. He had granted asylum to four Pandavas.
3. He said he would kill Arjun only but deep in his heart he really did not wish to - no elder brother would knowingly want to kill a younger sibling.
4. Bhishma did not want him and prevented him to fight.
5. Krishna cleverly avoided direct confrontation with him and Arjun and a few time that inevitably faced each other, used his magical hypnotic powers to confuse him in not using the shakti against Arjun.
6. On top of that, Karna was living with two curses which would render him impotent at the most crucial and final time of the battle.

They don't only use one source but they use multiple accurate sources.

Background of a warrior has to taken into account when comparing two warriors. He was fighting his brother, ofcourse he would have generated a soft corner for him.

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

Of-course he did... and part of Karna Parva yes.. why wont he... Karna was talking about his younger brother and mentally he was not what he was.. afterall Krishna and Kunti dint meet him to reveal his identity because they dint have anything else to do.. just a thought..

Originally posted by: Medha.S

The brother thing cant be true.In Karna Parva Krishna said Karna and Duryodhana laughed joyously after Abhimanyu was killed. They probably weren't thinking like uncles and brothers, just warriors probably.

Just my thought.

Originally posted by: TheWatcher

You have to count Karna's mental state when he was fighting in Kurekshetra, Here is an Article by Star Plus' Factually Incorrect Mahabharata facebook page on how Karna was handicapped during the war.

Karna was fighting all the time with one hand tied behind his back.

1. Krishna had stolen away his hatred and antagonism of the Pandavas.
2. He had granted asylum to four Pandavas.
3. He said he would kill Arjun only but deep in his heart he really did not wish to - no elder brother would knowingly want to kill a younger sibling.
4. Bhishma did not want him and prevented him to fight.
5. Krishna cleverly avoided direct confrontation with him and Arjun and a few time that inevitably faced each other, used his magical hypnotic powers to confuse him in not using the shakti against Arjun.
6. On top of that, Karna was living with two curses which would render him impotent at the most crucial and final time of the battle.

They don't only use one source but they use multiple accurate sources.

Background of a warrior has to taken into account when comparing two warriors. He was fighting his brother, ofcourse he would have generated a soft corner for him.

Originally posted by: Medha.S

3. He said he would kill Arjun only but deep in his heart he really did not wish to - no elder brother would knowingly want to kill a younger sibling.

If that is true then no brother would be laughing joyously after the younger brother's son gets murdered. Doesn't add up.