{| Doubts and Discussions about Mahabharata |}

First Previous

Page

119

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#1021

Originally posted by: srishtisingh
may b
thanx for answering satyabhata.one more qu. some people consider krishna to b a different deity than vishnu.how much truth is there? who is kalpurush? parambrahma is same as brahma?what difference between golok dham and baikunth

sorry no idea about this as per me krishna ji was avataar of vishnu ji only may be varaali or some one else know

Quote

Srishti

@srishtisingh

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#1022

k thanks guys! had nice discussion with u.nw I am going to sleep. gn

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

@DrModel

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#1023

I have some questions about how Krishna was regarded and have posted them in the OLD MB discussion thread. Is anyone able to please reply,

Thanks

Quote

Medha.S

@Medha.S

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#1024

Krishna was regarded as the vishnu reincarnate years before he went to negotiate with duri after the end of exile.
Arjuna, draupadi both talk about krishnas godliness and leela in vana parva.
This is when krishna comes to meet them.
So, there was no doubt about krishna being the supreme god.
I guess the diff. Was between knowing and seeing it.

Quote

AnjanaYYZ

@AnjanaYYZ

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 11 years ago

#1025

Originally posted by: Medha.S
Krishna was regarded as the vishnu reincarnate years before he went to negotiate with duri after the end of exile.
Arjuna, draupadi both talk about krishnas godliness and leela in vana parva.
This is when krishna comes to meet them.
So, there was no doubt about krishna being the supreme god.
I guess the diff. Was between knowing and seeing it.

Medha - Arjuna and Draupadi were top of his school, but I don't think everyone was enrolled in the class (dury, etc.). So, while they, Drona, Vidur, Bhishma might have accepted him as Vishnu reincarnate others may have had doubts.

Quote

Medha.S

@Medha.S

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#1026

Anjana -yes, some were accepting like pandavas,drau, parshuram, vidura, bheeshma.
Others were ignorant and paied for it. 😆
while the others knew and feared it, e.g. dhridrashtra who tried to bribe krishna to get him on kauravas side just before war, only to get called out on his bullshit by vidura.

Quote

AnjanaYYZ

@AnjanaYYZ

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 11 years ago

#1027

Medha - any idea which knowledge category Karna fell into? I think the was somewhere btwn the believers and non-believers.

Quote

Srishti

@srishtisingh

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#1028

one more qu.is kmg translation biased?

Quote

Medha.S

@Medha.S

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#1029

Quite the opposite.
Kmg is close to the critical edition we are talking about on perspective thread.
With only some contradiction.
Like kmg says karna got rejected, critical edit and many edit. Says he failed or did not take part.
Well, perhaps kmg had soft spot for karna.

Quote

Srishti

@srishtisingh

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#1030

wow.but people claimed he was biased towards arjun.and said many indignant sentences abt his knowledge. thats why I asked whether theae allegations are TRUE or not.because when ever someone quoted kmg they said it is biased.its really tough to say what is reality

Quote

1 ... 101 102 103 104 105 ... 119

{| Doubts and Discussions about Mahabharata |} - Page 103

Related Topics

Explore Topics