Why should she not ask the question because she is RK's mom? Any mom-in-law to be would want to know what was a man whom her son detests doing in his bedroom. I don't understand your logic.
Maybe the mom-in-law doesnt know that RK himself invited the gangster to the wedding? So what if RK detests someone Madhu should not talk to them. She cant talk to other men because RK says so? Its a really suffocating type of relationships to be in.
Further more what has Sultan done to RK in order to be detested besides being caught in the wrong places at the wrong times. Right now he hasnt done anything. He might in the future but that doesnt apply to the situation. He shares nothing more than an understanding with Madhu. He has never flirted or acted inappropriately with her. Does the mom-in law know the disgusting measure her own son used flirting with his own bhabi in front of Madhu in order to purposely get her jealous while Madhu isnt allowed to talk to Sultan or even be close to another guy. Nice! Further more RK had contradicted himself saying he would never be insecure of their friendship. I dont understand your or RK's logic for that matter.
Do you mean to say that because RK had in the past hurt Madhu and hence being his mother she has to put up with trespassing by gangsters in her home and listen quietly to a woman who keeps shouting that her son is a rakshas (equating him with her dead husband)? Radhaji was patient enough but when Pads went over the top she had to shut her up and she sure did because Pads did not come clean with her own involvement in this. Tell me one good reason why Pads did not speak up and defend her daughter?
Paddy could have easily answered back to Radhaji that she herself sent him there. AND no he was not there to kidnap her he went there to talk her out of the marriage. She could have easily answered back that she sent him there because doesnt want her son marrying that stupid abuser son of hers.
I was personally pissed when Radhaji said RK has made up for what he has done. How by acting stubborn, mad, and crazy? Then getting on his delicate knee once and asking for Madhu's hand in marriage because he himself wants her in his life. Where was Madhu and her pain in this???? RK is a rakshas since I consider emotional abuse worse than physical abuse because the scars last longer. Calling an abuser is fine since a mother should know what her son is and accept it.
The only reason Pads didnt speak up is because the CVs wanted this to be Radhaji's day and they wanted to glorify RK. The wedding and all is done to pleaze the Rishbala fans so you guys should be happy. I honestly believe Paddy could have easily answered back.
As to abusive relationship changing for the better to turn worse, lets see. There are heroes and heroes and then there is RK. I'm sure he will keep us on our toes.
In real life abuser and controling relationships never change dear. They only go in cycles. There is the honeymoon stage which forces week women to stay back because they cant resist. But sooner or later it goes back to being dead. In emotionally abusive relationships it usually ends with the women being an emotional wreck. In physically abusive relationships it normally ends with the women is dead. Very rarely do things end up permanently changing for the better. But if the CVs want to sell this as true love than so be it.
CID
Hindi TV Shows
Anupamaa
