If Tulsi had enough proofs against Abir, she could have proved Abir in fornt of the family and could have sent him to jail...do u think she lied to Abir?? Or may be she didn;t wanted to make a scene of Shantinikentan and its Izzath in front of the guests at the wedding and probably wanted to end this in a simple way. Now no one knows the originality of Abir and they r thinking that he just chated Bhoomi. (After few days Abir will make up a story and again prooves himself innocent..and the we are all back to square one.)
Did Tulsi had the proofs and did this in a simpleway without making a scene just to save Virani khandaan's izzath or do u think she never had any prrofs and she just played a trick???