Originally posted by: Chitrashi
Yet Ashu and Mallu have had these experiences in the past. Remember the sharing of the coat was a memory shared by Ashu and not Mallika.
My understanding of their relationship has been that while Mallika is romantically inclined towards Ashu, he has not. But he's always been aware of the feelings she harbors for him. Even when they were dating and before Baba came to know about them, Ash asked Nidhi to model herself on Mallika and take advice from her about her jewelry etc.
Mallika was a familiar visitor in Ashu's house and he never objected to her questioning him about who was coming to his house etc. Remember when Nidhi forgot her bindi in the bathroom, and Mallika questioned him. Ashu didn't ask her to mind her own business, he was instead giving an explanation.
So while his words might've said something, his actions totally belied his words. In his actions, he led Mallika to make certain assumptions about his behavior.
Not that it justifies what Mallika is doing now, or has done in the past. But somewhere Ashu holds some responsibility too for his actions/inactions such as they are.
When there are riots do we absolve the police from all responsibility, if the cops say "but we never came to the scene of the riots, so how can we be held to blame"? Isn't this a similar situation?
Mallika's references to the past were intended to sow the seeds of suspicion in Nidhi's mind...whether she has succeeded in that or not, KPji has surely succeeded in getting his viewers to question his lead character's integrity...
Rather than hearsay ( in this case Mallika say), I prefer to go by what I have seen in the past...and that is an Ashutosh who maintained a clear physical and even emotional distance from Mallika...he never allowed her any more liberties than those that are afforded to a friend...never was his attitude towards her anything other than platonic...
Coming to Mallika's references, she also added that, on almost all those situations, she was unwell...if someone can mistake kindness for love, people had better think twice before being kind...a friend cheers you up by playing the violin when you are sick, helps with your hair and eats the food you cook...however there is nothing to indicate that he did all this of his own volition rather than as a response to your request/ plea...how can this then be misunderstand as love...maybe he was too nice a person to refuse a lady assistance...!
On the overcoat, we have no clue on the circumstances under which it was shared...however, if his intentions were romantic rather than platonic, I doubt if he would have been idiot enough to discuss it once he had moved on...how do we know it was not done to avoid hypothermia...can we possibly assume that a lifeguard who administers mouth-to-mouth resuscitation to a lady, whom he has rescued from drowning, is actually kissing her? These characters are doctors who will not/should not view casual touch and physical proximity as an impropriety.
On the bindi incident, to me it revealed Mallika's absolute lack of social etiquette and absolute disregard for a friend's privacy...what was Ashutosh to have done? She was a friend and a guest. He could not be rude to her. So he just told her exactly what happened!
With regard to personal space, the choice of maintaining physical distance/space normally rests with a woman. The man follows the boundaries that she establishes. I allow some of my male friends the luxury of a hug when we meet...there are others who are kept at a handshaking distance...Mallika clearly allowed or rather welcomed Ashutosh into her private space...but he responded to it only and only when she was ill...and continues to do the same even now...
Beyond all this, the fact that all of us have debated this for long proves only one thing...KPji has got what he wanted...it was this debate that he wanted to get going!
Edited by Sujatha.rao - 13 years ago