Devrath Dixit at Crossroads - Again!! - Page 6

excellent thoughts! i am sure the CV's will always take the more circuitous route.. we want option # 1, we will get Option # 2.

Option # 1 will be the most sensible one to follow.. but..

Originally posted by: gemini54

Hi Suvi lovely topic. I maybe in the minority but I think Devrath Dixit will take the road less traveled ( pun intended)😉 he will not hurt Sona this time the reason being if they show that there is never a going back for him and I think Sona and he will be finished. Sona still loves him but knows because of his mother he broke their marriage but again if they show him not because of his mother but exhibiting hurtful tendencies that is not derived from love but hate for Sona how can they ever redeem the hero?

This is just my thought but experts in Indian Serials including Tia and Guddi have told me that I am wrong and that is what has been shown in the past for a strong hero so it maybe just wishful thinking on my part😆

Originally posted by: DevakshiCrazy

Sach bolun i dnt want the custody battle thing
Kyunki humara show unique hai na i want them to sort things out like mature individuals

Oh darling, you have opened a can of worms there.

Originally posted by: reachanupama

Don't know about Dev but I am at crossroads.

I have a daughter about the same age as Suhana. I cannot imagine my daughter not knowing about her dad, specially if he is alive and is in the same town. I have read a lot of posts where people have praised Suhana's maturity at not asking for her lest it hurts her mom. What they are showing is crap. A 6 year old child can never display such behaviour. At their age, they are happy with toys, friends, chocolates etc. Normally a child acts beyond his/her age because of the circumstances that force them to do so. In Suhana's case, she had a perfectly normal upbringing and a very loving family. And the dumbest thing I have ever heard is a mother asking a 6-year old if she wants to meet her father and just because the child says no, she lays the matter to rest. You are doing a good job raising a child who has a mind of her own but there are certain things where you just should not go by what a child feels. Coming back to whether she should have told Dev about Suhana, I feel she should have, if not then, at least now when they bump into each other everyday. If she had any intention to not let him know, she should move out of Delhi. She has no right to stay there and play hide and seek, with or without her excuses, pre-nup etc.

Originally posted by: dhank

superb what u said is bang on every word...it couldnt b more stupid than this..I have d same feeling y stay in delhi then..just stay away ...

Originally posted by: tia.o

Oh darling, you have opened a can of worms there.

Here's my two cents worth. I agree with Lavanya there.

I said before that in this appearance-is-everything world, jo dikhta nehin wo bikta nehin.

So far, CVs loving showed Dev's pain seven years ago, his pain of losing his love while he was dating multiple girls (yeah, real tough life. I wish Sonakshi was showing her pain the same way. But wait, she is a woman), his erratic and out of control behaviour around Sonakshi.

What CVs hasn't shown and we don't bother to think that every pregnant woman don't dream that when they get pregnant their husband should not be around. When a woman is expecting baby, she needs her husband THE MOST. She hopes that he will pamper her, bring her food she is craving, help her with her housework, ask her to rest, will go to the doctor with her and experience all the firsts from there baby and marvel together.

On top of that, not only she had to go through what might not have been an easy pregnancy knowing her medical condition, she was in debt, sole provider of her family and homeless.

I can bet you that she was not jumping with joy at that time for not having her child's father or his support. Yet, she chose to do a very tough job on her own because a piece of legal paper signed by Dev Dixit along with nasty, below the belt accusations made her chose the tough path.

But what surprises me though is the same people who are accusing Sonakshi for hiding Soha because Dev missed out 6 years of her life are also saying that Sonakshi should leave Delhi so that Dev NEVER finds out about Soha until she decides to contact her father as an adult. Isn't that kind of contradictory ideas? Why such a desire to coddle Dev that people have to leave the city so that he can be happy? Then why doesn't he leave the country and stop harassing people?

Yes, Dev missed out on Soha's 6 years of life. Sonakshi also missed out having a supporting husband and being able to share responsibilities of raising a child with a life partner. Sonakshi did not set out to be a single parent (no woman is set out to be a single parent), she was forced to be a single parent because in her relationship, there was never her husband and her.

There was always, her husband and her mother-in-law and she was the "OTHER WOMAN" who came in between them. No woman will take her child and walk into a messed up equation like that. Dev and Ishwari made her feel that Ishwari is the owner of Dev whom she has lent to her for use. I don't know who will raise a child in that environment and hand over her child's control through his father to a mentally messed up woman and I don't know how she could have prevented that knowing Dev's then blind devotion to the same mentally unstable woman. She would have been trapped and her child would have been trapped as well.

So today, after constant struggle, she has shut out her emotions. What it takes to do so for a woman who believed in eternal love and happily ever after only she can understand. But then, the world is strangely unsympathetic towards a woman's struggle while it's all too happy to jump in with a cuddle blanket at a man't pain. Because whether a woman gets her right or not, a man's right must be protected at all times.

Sorry Suvika. This writing came from a place inside me when I see the phrase "women are their worst enemy" proven over and over. No one is ready to pass judgement and criticise our littlest flaws the way we do to each other.

Well Tia, I do agree with your observations. This post is not to glorify Ishwari or Dev or forget about the pain and humiliation they have caused Sonakshi and her family. All I am protesting is the absolute jerk she is being in letting a 6 year old decide if she wants to meet her dad. Its not as simple as asking her do you want Perk or Kit-Kat ? If the CVs want to show that Suhana is mature, sorry I disagree. I have interacted with multiple kids her age across all strata of society and I have not come across one kid who is like Suhana. Even my maid's son (her husband left her to marry another lady) has the normal wishes of any 7 year old.

Secondly I have no problems if Sonakshi continues to stay where she is provided she builds up her strength to confront any accusations that come her way. She should have never come back if she was not ready. I find her quite silly sharing her fears with Jatin when she had a choice to stay where she was. Was'nt she the one who, while coming to Delhi told Bijoy confidently that she was ready to face the world.

Originally posted by: pkbdas61

excellent thoughts! i am sure the CV's will always take the more circuitous route.. we want option # 1, we will get Option # 2.

Option # 1 will be the most sensible one to follow.. but..

Originally posted by: tia.o

Oh darling, you have opened a can of worms there.

Here's my two cents worth. I agree with Lavanya there.

I said before that in this appearance-is-everything world, jo dikhta nehin wo bikta nehin.

So far, CVs loving showed Dev's pain seven years ago, his pain of losing his love while he was dating multiple girls (yeah, real tough life. I wish Sonakshi was showing her pain the same way. But wait, she is a woman), his erratic and out of control behaviour around Sonakshi.

What CVs hasn't shown and we don't bother to think that every pregnant woman don't dream that when they get pregnant their husband should not be around. When a woman is expecting baby, she needs her husband THE MOST. She hopes that he will pamper her, bring her food she is craving, help her with her housework, ask her to rest, will go to the doctor with her and experience all the firsts from there baby and marvel together.

On top of that, not only she had to go through what might not have been an easy pregnancy knowing her medical condition, she was in debt, sole provider of her family and homeless.

I can bet you that she was not jumping with joy at that time for not having her child's father or his support. Yet, she chose to do a very tough job on her own because a piece of legal paper signed by Dev Dixit along with nasty, below the belt accusations made her chose the tough path.

But what surprises me though is the same people who are accusing Sonakshi for hiding Soha because Dev missed out 6 years of her life are also saying that Sonakshi should leave Delhi so that Dev NEVER finds out about Soha until she decides to contact her father as an adult. Isn't that kind of contradictory ideas? Why such a desire to coddle Dev that people have to leave the city so that he can be happy? Then why doesn't he leave the country and stop harassing people?

Yes, Dev missed out on Soha's 6 years of life. Sonakshi also missed out having a supporting husband and being able to share responsibilities of raising a child with a life partner. Sonakshi did not set out to be a single parent (no woman is set out to be a single parent), she was forced to be a single parent because in her relationship, there was never her husband and her.

There was always, her husband and her mother-in-law and she was the "OTHER WOMAN" who came in between them. No woman will take her child and walk into a messed up equation like that. Dev and Ishwari made her feel that Ishwari is the owner of Dev whom she has lent to her for use. I don't know who will raise a child in that environment and hand over her child's control through his father to a mentally messed up woman and I don't know how she could have prevented that knowing Dev's then blind devotion to the same mentally unstable woman. She would have been trapped and her child would have been trapped as well.

So today, after constant struggle, she has shut out her emotions. What it takes to do so for a woman who believed in eternal love and happily ever after only she can understand. But then, the world is strangely unsympathetic towards a woman's struggle while it's all too happy to jump in with a cuddle blanket at a man't pain. Because whether a woman gets her right or not, a man's right must be protected at all times.

Sorry Suvika. This writing came from a place inside me when I see the phrase "women are their worst enemy" proven over and over. No one is ready to pass judgement and criticise our littlest flaws the way we do to each other.

Originally posted by: reachanupama

Well Tia, I do agree with your observations. This post is not to glorify Ishwari or Dev or forget about the pain and humiliation they have caused Sonakshi and her family. All I am protesting is the absolute jerk she is being in letting a 6 year old decide if she wants to meet her dad. Its not as simple as asking her do you want Perk or Kit-Kat ? If the CVs want to show that Suhana is mature, sorry I disagree. I have interacted with multiple kids her age across all strata of society and I have not come across one kid who is like Suhana. Even my maid's son (her husband left her to marry another lady) has the normal wishes of any 7 year old.

Secondly I have no problems if Sonakshi continues to stay where she is provided she builds up her strength to confront any accusations that come her way. She should have never come back if she was not ready. I find her quite silly sharing her fears with Jatin when she had a choice to stay where she was. Was'nt she the one who, while coming to Delhi told Bijoy confidently that she was ready to face the world.