Daily Discussion Thread 3 Krishna chali London. - Page 45

Originally posted by: ssuuvvii

No segment came..We were just guessing & i feel divorce is out of question now as to get divorce couple must spent 6 months together in marriage ..

She knows BS trapped her & she was arrested on basis of that confession which she dunger .

Originally posted by: divine_16

@bold-wah ji wah Madamji yeh sab jantey hue bhi ... she trusted BS??Stupidity at it's peak.The same person is framing her for Radhey's murder and doesn't she realise that this same person can create evidences to trap Veer also???If he could make her sign papers then it's not a big deal to create evidences against Veer also.

Originally posted by: annx

And it can't be annulled since they've commensurated the marriage already...

But this is ITV - they can very easily ignore this law/rule.

Originally posted by: annx

Did you see today's episode Ishani? because BS had all the pictorial evidence. You can create pictures. The pictures showed Veer and Sunaina and Radhay dying...

Also, she goes and asks Veer, Veer says yes! Had Veer said no, she would've questioned the evidence!

Originally posted by: tranquilmelody

Oooh... someone is so very pissed at Krishna 😆. But realistically speaking, for the way you want Krishna to react & to trust, as Renu said, they should have had more time for their relationship to deepen & strengthen. It is very easy to break a marriage within the 1st 3-5 years. Love only gets you so far as the wedding & honeymoon period after that it is lot of hard work - interaction, communication, give and take adjustments, exploring each others' strengths and weaknesses, understanding the quirks, differentiating between quirks and character traits, the list goes on.

Here theirs is not even 3 months old. AND look at how BS presented the evidence and weaved a very convincing, seemingly logical reason for Veer to marrying her. We audiences were fooled by his performance. You can't blame her for doing so. It is unfair to expect the level of trust which takes years & tons of togetherness, from a 2 month marriage especially when there is so much proof to believe.

What you say about having blind trust looks good only in stories doesn't happen in real life unfortunately.

Originally posted by: tranquilmelody

Oooh... someone is so very pissed at Krishna 😆. But realistically speaking, for the way you want Krishna to react & to trust, as Renu said, they should have had more time for their relationship to deepen & strengthen. It is very easy to break a marriage within the 1st 3-5 years. Love only gets you so far as the wedding & honeymoon period after that it is lot of hard work - interaction, communication, give and take adjustments, exploring each others' strengths and weaknesses, understanding the quirks, differentiating between quirks and character traits, the list goes on.

Here theirs is not even 3 months old. AND look at how BS presented the evidence and weaved a very convincing, seemingly logical reason for Veer to marrying her. We audiences were fooled by his performance. You can't blame her for doing so. It is unfair to expect the level of trust which takes years & tons of togetherness, from a 2 month marriage especially when there is so much proof to believe.

What you say about having blind trust looks good only in stories doesn't happen in real life unfortunately.

Originally posted by: divine_16

Sahana.. in my post I have not nentioned anything about 'trusting' Veer.I just have mentioned that she should have LISTENED to Veer's plea of hearing him once.Isn't that what Veer could ask from her?Is this so much to ask for?But she is clearly going with a PRECONCEIVED notion that Veer is a killer.Proper communication clears up many misunderstandings.And here Krishna is totally debarring that route ... and that makes me pissed off!! I think asking to trust someone so early is bit too much esp.when they are so new in marraige but trusting the same person (BS)who have framed her signing the papers of killing Radhey is stupidity.It's natural that if BS can frame her then it's not a big deal to frame Veer also.And this means everytime BS will come up with so called 'pakka saboot' and she will thrash Veer like thisNo Communicating properly just giving the final verdict!!!

Originally posted by: Houstonmom

Sweetheart shukla admitted that he lied about that and that he lied before but proved to her in a twisted way that he isn't lieing now . She didn't blindly trust Shukla the pictures were clear as day. The GPS proved his exact location and she peiced everything together herself remembering her mother in-law pressuring her to accept the crime and remembering Veers nightmares waking up yelling " I killed him , I killed him . She also remembered Veers reaction how he shut down and ran from the interview never to be seen again when she told the lawyer how the accident happened. Veer offered his head to shukla willingly to save Krishna gave him absolutely everything. It's too early to talk about the precap but they twisted it so much and framed veer perfectly to look like he is fleeing leaving her to rot in jail. Tickets in pocket and bags in the trunk of the car that he was standing right next to . He was caught red handed according to what she saw . It's not that she doesn't trust him enough to listen . It looks like she is devestated that he ditched her to pay for his crime while he fled to save himself.

Originally posted by: divine_16