Originally posted by: jagdu
Anyone who endorses nethra for her acting needs to attend a class in psychology. First, she's a nymphomaniac. People here are agreeing that her infidelity is good acting-what is wrong with these people?
She is a woman with no morals or ethics in the play or in real life, no character, has framed a man Jeeva just to hurt another decent woman Laxmi, who is extremely virutuous. Not one bad acting on that actor's part. After all it is her story, why should anyone else try and steal the limelight?
Jagdu, I think you are taking it to serious here. Its okay to have different views from the rest of the Ifians, and I am glad you do see it from a different angle...but by coming up with a statement like this "Anyone who endorses nethra for her acting needs to attend a class in psychology" will be taken as a directly insulting of fians. majority here likes acting of the negative character here and nothing is wrong with that, when its comes to the story - we all are for Lakshmi - she is the victim here but when it comes to the acting - I prefer LP acting better than Meena (she was an good actress in big screen.
The story is about Laksmi, but sometimes poeple who comes in side role manage to take the limelight with their excellent acting, it has beeen seen in both, small and big screen. exp - Padayappa - when you come out from the theatre - only the characther Neelambari will get attention first- simpy cause the acting was great and even outstanded superstar😉
so in the future - avoid to come with remarks directy to our members here - we are all here to discuss the show - not to insult each other cause of drama which doesnt have any moral at all.