Originally posted by: tele_vision
no offence but i feel there are better deserving actors in india even to start acting afresh.i feel sorry for them they cud be really in need for a job.shud say she was below avg in acting skill.i hope someday india turns out to be a coutry where fame or reward comes thru hardwork and to the deserving hands 😊 and people r recognized by their work.i am sorry if ive hurt anyone.
I can understand what you are saying. But i do want to ask if you had a particular actor you thought would better do the role of Prachi. As i see it Panchi was not chosen for the role for her acting skills. Instead, Prachi was the kind of character that Panchi did not need to act in order to portray. There is probably a very very thin line between the mannerisms of Panchi and Prachi (other than the clothes they wear). I don't blame Ekta for choosing Panchi to play the role over others. As i feel that Panchi is the face of the innocence that is Prachi. It wasn't until recently that her role required her to step up her acting skills...and i would like to give her the chance to improve and prove herself worthy of the challenge. She didn't need to be the best actor on the set to make us believe that she is Prachi. No other actor no matter how good their acting skills could have fit the role so naturally. Its her gift from God and there is no use cribbing about it. As for your complaint about better actors...my post never meant to say that Prachi is the best actor. I just said that she has improved a lot judging from her own standards. And when it comes to criticism and improving skills your target should always be to outdo yourself and you shouldn't compare your skills to others in the same line, because that will limit you to the abilities of others. If you always try to outdo yourself, there will be no limit to your achievement. (now don't i sound like a perfectionist).😆😆😆