Katha Ankahee -- #15 daily EDT - Page 105

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

93.9k

Users

53

Likes

2.9k

Frequent Posters

Anj_01 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 1 years ago

Originally posted by: Pete15rogmourey

People litterally brgan messaging stuff like "Thank you for ruining the show , thank you for making KA the worst show , stupid acting and writting" smiley7


Cant blame them also, they really like the show and become attached to it.

But yes, they should never leave their maturity. They behave like child.

CID-fan-394 thumbnail
Posted: 1 years ago

Originally posted by: Anj_01


Cant blame them also, they really like the show and become attached to it.

But yes, they should never leave their maturity. They behave like child.

Exactly, criticisms can also be given politely instead of out right attacking the makers , also what will these fans get from attacking the actors?

Anj_01 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 1 years ago

Originally posted by: Pete15rogmourey

Alpviram was the best Sony Tv show to handle a sensitive topic with only 20% of melodramasmiley36


Yes it was a masterpiece.

But there was no social media at that time. think abou it in todays time. If they decide to make it again without changes or just re run the original then also you will see much stronger reactions.

Remember the character of smita bansal with whom ML's parents pressurize him to get married. If my memory is correct then she played a character of journalist who wanted to cover FL's story but got attached to her fiance and they almost ended up getting married. Just think about it in todays time. People would have trolled the hell out of her and called all sorts of names to actor.

Anj_01 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 1 years ago

Originally posted by: Neutral2

@bold, it will be opposite, Katha can sue the company for doing gender bias in giving job and promotion. Even it is private company, they have to follow Government rules and regulations.

@red, completely disagree. I dont understand where it is hinted that Katha was interested in him subconsciously before ONS. The theories are completely made up to greywashing Viaan ONS offer and to justify love story.

There are phases of life. There is phase where Katha just want to save Aarav, then she was scared of Viaans touch after ONS and try to keep distance from him, then she was consciously aware of his presence/action, then she become curious about him, after knowing his past she instantly forgive him then got interested in him in lonavala (their first proper talk), from there love story start. Even in their love story there are phases.



Rest of the thing, I agree.


@bold many things have been said about it. We all know what is ideal and what actually corporate houses follows practically and how law and loopholes works. What made you think earthcon didn't have gender bias point cover already. There were already sufficient amount of female staff and who would have sided with katha to give testimony in her favour?

And I guess it was not about gender bias and giving job to female but more about that she had a child who was terminally ill and demand most of her time which means less time and focus on job. While anyone could sympathize with her but ultimately any corporate house would have denied job to her. Thats why when she looked for another job after resigning from EC, she resolved not to hide any details. She even managed to convince new company about her time commitments. She could have done in EC also if she was so righteous but that time she hid the important detail just to get the job. So its an significant misrepresentation of facts and makes a cause for counter claim.

Anyways, lets not get into the details of ifs and buts here. Its a waste of time because show didn't follow that path. If it did then it could have been a good law drama.

@red well you have full right to disagree as I already mentioned its just a theory and its MY theory. Its like how I interpreted things from certain nuances of characters and story. Its not universal truth. Different people look at things differently.

But just as I dont agree with people bashing viaan left right and centre and putting katha on mahaanta ka pedestal, same way, everyone will not agree with my theory and its perfectly fine.

Edited by Anj_01 - 1 years ago
Anj_01 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 1 years ago

Originally posted by: Pete15rogmourey

Exactly, criticisms can also be given politely instead of out right attacking the makers , also what will these fans get from attacking the actors?


Just a satisfaction of venting out their frustration smiley36

CID-fan-394 thumbnail
Posted: 1 years ago

Originally posted by: Anj_01


Yes it was a masterpiece.

But there was no social media at that time. think abou it in todays time. If they decide to make it again without changes or just re run the original then also you will see much stronger reactions.

Remember the character of smita bansal with whom ML's parents pressurize him to get married. If my memory is correct then she played a character of journalist who wanted to cover FL's story but got attached to her fiance and they almost ended up getting married. Just think about it in todays time. People would have trolled the hell out of her and called all sorts of names to actor.

Yes Smitha Bansal's character would've been trolled like hell in today's timesmiley37

But she made sure that Amrita and the ML's name was Raghav i guess ( what a coincidence smiley37) got back together

Plus Smitha Bansal will always be inspector Aditi from CID for mesmiley42


Edit ; i just checked , the ML's name was Rohit in the showsmiley26


Edit 2 ,; I just noticed that i had written FL instead of ML 🤦 smiley37

Edited by Pete15rogmourey - 1 years ago
CID-fan-394 thumbnail
Posted: 1 years ago

Originally posted by: Anj_01


Just a satisfaction of venting out their frustration smiley36

This is the wrong way of doing it thosmiley6

Neutral2 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 1 years ago

Originally posted by: Anj_01


@bold many things have been said about it. We all know what is ideal and what actually corporate houses follows practically and how law and loopholes works. What made you think earthcon didn't have gender bias point cover already. There were already sufficient amount of female staff and who would have sided with katha to give testimony in her favour?

And I guess it was not about gender bias and giving job to female but more about that she had a child who was terminally ill and demand most of her time which means less time and focus on job. While anyone could sympathize with her but ultimately any corporate house would have denied job to her. Thats why when she looked for another job after resigning from EC, she resolved not to hide any details. She even managed to convince new company about her time commitments. She could have done in EC also if she was so righteous but that time she hid the important detail just to get the job. So its an significant misrepresentation of facts and makes a cause for counter claim.

Anyways, lets not get into the details of ifs and buts here. Its a waste of time because show didn't follow that path. If it did then it could have been a good law drama.

Court has always softer towards employee and especially female. In many real scenario, court has taken decision in favor of employee and decided to give their position back with compensation.

If Earthcon would have fired her, and she decided to file a FIR, the first thing court will ask on what basis you fired her. If they have legal contract that she couldn't have a child, they are finished already. If they don't have legal contract, only instructed HR to not hire woman with a child, they have no legal basis to fire Katha.

Court will ask what you have to do with her personal data. You should only worry about professional certificates. The personal data they ask is only for the employee convenience (not for company).

Rewa will side with Katha. Court can setup internal enquiry and some mothers who are not promoted can verify that.

Now it is confirmed that Katha is not at all righteous character. More like she focus on self progress and only react when something wrong happen to her.

Edited by Neutral2 - 1 years ago
Neutral2 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 1 years ago

Originally posted by: Anj_01

@red well you have full right to disagree as I already mentioned its just a theory and its MY theory. Its like how I interpreted things from certain nuances of characters and story. Its not universal truth. Different people look at things differently.

But just as I dont agree with people bashing viaan left right and centre and putting katha on mahaanta ka pedestal, same way, everyone will not agree with my theory and its perfectly fine.

Theory must have some basis otherwise it is just an imagination.

If you think forgiveness and falling for him instantly after forgiving is the basis of your theory, then I have no argument.

There are many contradiction happen during those phase. Some started to say, she started behaving like a wife, some started saying eyelock happening means romance started, some hated when there are officially no talks happening between lead pair when Katha asked Viaan to keep distance from him.

Everybody can have their own perception of viewing these scene. But most of these perception is coming because everybody know who are lead character and it is a love story.

Anj_01 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 1 years ago

Originally posted by: Neutral2

Court has always softer towards employee and especially female. In many real scenario, court has taken decision in favor of employee and decided to give their position back with compensation.

If Earthcon would have fired her, and she decided to file a FIR, the first thing court will ask on what basis you fired her. If they have legal contract that she couldn't have a child, they are finished already. If they don't have legal contract, only instructed HR to not hire woman with a child, they have no legal basis to fire Katha.

Court will ask what you have to do with her personal data. You should only worry about professional certificates. The personal data they ask is only for the employee convenience (not for company).

Rewa will side with Katha. Court can setup internal enquiry and some mothers who are not promoted can verify that.

Now it is confirmed that Katha is not at all righteous character. More like she focus on self progress and only react when something wrong happen to her.


Leave it yaar, there could have been many scenarios to it and many debates how would court perceive it. Actually it all depends on good lawyer who know his way with law.

As I said, it could have been a good law drama that way.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".