Originally posted by: sashashyam
My dear Najma,
You are clearly a metaphysician manquee! 😉
Aunty, I am not sure if that is appreciation or criticism. But thanks nonetheless. 😆😆 On a serious note, I am really sorry for such a late reply. Did you comment on yesterday's episode somewhere? No one really has commented on it. I made a post in the thread called Take on Episode 8. Do check it out, I'd love to hear your comments. 😉
But yes, of course the precedent set by Bhishma was a wrong and dangerous one. Did I not point that out somewhere else, I think it was in the Conscience Keeper thread?
I think I missed this post, but nevertheless, true.My simpler, non-metaphysical point of view is that grabbing a woman - even such an obnoxious, insufferable woman - against her will is a crime. Period. None of the explanations/ justifications that Karna might dream up to support his adharma will wash for me.
True, but life isn't all that black and white is what I feel. Looking at it objectively, even I would agree with you. But I am not looking at it, that objectively.
Nor will it suffice that Bhanumati makes the best of a bad job and agrees to marry Duryodhana. I had explained why, but it seems that did not carry conviction with you.
See, the only thing that can salvage the situation is if she accedes to marrying him (w.r.t only Episode 7, not the last two episodes.) If she does, then her maan sammaan and whatever is not compromised, and therefore it may not seem wrong. And when it does not seem wrong, I wouldn't hold Karn guilty. It is just that I am just more biased towards Karn and Duryodhan, and therefore I am giving concessions. 😆This is the beginning of the slippery slide for Karna. At many points in the actual epic, as during the Laakshagrih arson, he could have tried to use his influence to curb Duryodhana's worst instincts. He never does.
I am not sure which way this story is going to swing. I think they should have promoted Duryodhan in the promos as well as in the show launch, coz he seems way more important than Arjun to me, as on date. Even later, when Urvi chooses Karn over Arjun, Duryodhan is going to be of greater significance. Sorry for digressing, every show depicts a different Duryodhan-Karn relationship. The old MB I think portrayed a relatively dimwitted Duryodhan (At least that is what I perceived) but honest and sincere in his friendship. In the past week, I have checked out two different shows portraying these equations, to get a better picture. One showed Duryodhan using Karn explicitly, the other showed a sincere friendship but where Duryodhan does passive bullying. 😆
So, idk what the actual critical edition Mahabharat states and all, but let us wait before we comment on how Karn influences Duryodhan. Since this is a fictional tale, we could see something different that could partly redeem Karn, if not Duryodhan. 😉
Finally, I could see nothing on his face when Duryodhana grabs Bhanumati. Neither then nor afterwards till their departure. He seems to me to be uni-expressional. Clearly I need a visual aid, or else it is that folks here see things that don't exist because they want them to be there, Which may not be a bad thing for staying happy with this Karna.
No, I think he was expressive. Wasn't he like part disgusted? 😆 Or my fondness for Aashim Gulati's Karn is making me love his lack of acting too. 😆
Shyamala Aunty