@eklayvafan1; psawyer; ankit: Great POVS and analysis. 👏. I hope the writers of KGGK show as much maturity in the storyline as your posts contain.
I read an interesting question by someone - asking us to picture if Pranay was basically a nice person and if he had done this because Mets was in love with Adi and he was threatened. - My take is that marriage is not a free license for legalized rapes. Physical relations have to be consentual and both parties need to agree to it. So being threatened is not an acceptable reason - nothing really is. Even if there was no Adi and Pranay & Mets were happily married and Pranay forced himseld on Mets one fine day when she didn't want it - it would still be rape.
Unfortunate thing is that indian laws are archaic and gives men too much leverage over women. Pranay is a total creep but as most of you gals pointed out most people tend to think that men have blanket ownerships on their wives. And I really really resent that.
Regarding posts about Adi saving Mets, I take strong offense to that idea. Marrying Adi is not going to bring any closure for Mets. Mets does NOT need Adi to marry her & save her from Pranay. She can & should do it on her own. She may need friends to support her and listen to her but its her fight not Adi's.