WHO SAID/DID WHAT ???? - Page 3

Originally posted by: LoveInAutumn26

Oh ok. Everyone should always speak the truth. Then, what about Rohit lying to Veena for 14 years about Naren's affair and Pooja being his daughter? What about YK-Nishi lying to Pooja about her adoption, then fake mother Rani, and Naren being her father? What about YK-Nishi lying to Veena as well as the rest of Sippys for the past 21 years about the same?

Should people always speak the truth??? If Rohit-YK-Nishi-Naren had told Veena the truth at the right time, all of this shit and nonsense drama wouldn't have been happening right now anyway.

That already I said is a big mistake of rohith ,yk and Nishi .if naren was humiliated in public by rohith himself and not rohith trying to hide issue by lying ...then Rohan would have never dared to be a casan ova ..I said this multiple times in forum in past 24 hours

Lies deceit hiding are root cause of all probs in society

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

Rohith mistake is going to confront pari instead of rohan..that's the grave mistaje he did .he can't question pari without slapping Rohan first

And questioning himself in his decision to marry Sona is not wrong .that's quite a natural reaction ..we do in times of stress and shock .

@bold: Lmao🤣 you must be kidding me. Yes we do say bitter things when we are angry but DEFENDING rohit's actions and words in the name of anger (mind u, what he said about the marriage and how he blamed sonakshi is something u can't easily ignore regardless of whether ur in Ur senses or not) while literally holding sonakshi responsible for every minor thing when all that poor soul trying to do is find a rational balance and peace in both the family - I'm sorry but this is utterly ridiculous.

Originally posted by: LoveInAutumn26

Don't really wanna explain much on the latest episodes as I have said enough in the discussion forum. But I think you are really harsh on Sonakshi. Anything she does, you find faults in her, like how she slapped Pari and told her that both her and Rohan are at fault and she can't blame Rohan alone on this affair. Sona was absolutely right in this judgement, only her and Tanya were the sensible one to blame both Rohan and Pari, unlike Veena and Rohit. It seems like you extremely hate or are critical of Sona's character (whatever your reason is idk), but you give benefit of doubt, leeway to other characters, though they are equally at fault as Sona is.

Coming to Rohit, whatever he said, whether its in anger, in impulsiveness, doesn't justify it. Rohit literally questioned that his marriage to Sonakshi was a mistake. That is a huge coming from a husband. Think of it from Sona's POV.... the affair gets revealed, she literally minutes ago finds out about her Sister and BIL's affair and was busy consoling/taking care of Tanya, her SIL, when Veena should have done it (but instead she was out to Rastogis to settle her score with Suman), and she gets to hear all sorts of nonsense hurling from her husband. Why would Rohit even fualt Sona or just her family for the affair. What about his brother? Shouldn't his first approach been to confront his brother? Nope, instead he's busy blaming Sona. Should Sona have done the same? When Naren was spouting all sorts of crap about her character and her profession, should Sona have blamed Rohit for it because he belongs to a Sippy family? Should she have blamed rest of the Sippys? Would that have been fair on Rohit, to be judged for what his father says? Similarly, Rohit blaming Sona and her family for Pari's deeds are uncalled for. Neither Suman, nor Sona encouraged this affair. They are both on dark as are rest of the Sippys. You can justify it whatever way, but what Rohit said to Sona and what Veena did to Pari (instead of confronting her own son) were wrong and uncalled for.

Yes, I agree Sona shouldn't have lied to Rohit about Ajit's blackmailing, but even for that Rohit put her in that position, constantly telling her "my mom is the most imp for me, her happiness matters the most, she's the top most priority, I trust you to protect my mom and this family (his convo with YK/Nishi)". Though I believe even though Rohit said all this, Sona should have still confided in him, but I don't fully blame her for not doing it either.

In anyway, this whole situation could have been handled better if both communicated with each other. As simple as that.

No offense meant!

The way u have balanced iut ur approach towards each character without bieng biassed is just so wonderful!❤

Originally posted by: Mushfika_01

@bold: Lmao🤣 you must be kidding me. Yes we do say bitter things when we are angry but DEFENDING rohit's actions and words in the name of anger (mind u, what he said about the marriage and how he blamed sonakshi is something u can't easily ignore regardless of whether ur in Ur senses or not) while literally holding sonakshi responsible for every minor thing when all that poor should trying to do is find a rational balance and peace in both the family - I'm sorry but this is utterly ridiculous.

Is she striving for Noble peace home award or what .she pokes in matters that are not at all necessary i.e which working woman wants all the issues of a joint family seriously ...that's why we blame her for her mahaan deeds

Which working lady quits her job bcos her snobbish FIL says he won't talk to her .isn't it a blessing in real for a snobbish fellow to not interact with u any.more .

Mahaan deeds are not natural .Sona is not natural

I'm sorry but I completely disagree with your post today - you might be right about some stuff but that got overshadowed by your biased opinion about rohit while you completely went off about bashing Sona. If you can find a explanation as to why rohit is right after saying all that bitter things about his innocent wife when she had absolutely NO hand in this whatsoever, you should've also seen sonakshi's innocence. It's like u can defending every other character who's doing wrong except the actual innocent one's (sonakshi). I used to think u were putting too much logic and that's why ur blaming so in every post of yours but that's not true. You just hate sonakshi's character in general and that's why finding every action of her wrong. I'm sorry but I reslly didn't like your post today

Originally posted by: Mushfika_01

Hey mili, been following your post for a while now and it's high time I make this comment: I really think you should see Sona in a different light. Every act and every action from her side, you point it out and start bashing. Even the smallest of behavior u don't let go.

You said sonakshi should've let pari a chance to explain?? Are you serious?! What explanation is there to give when u see a video OS your own sister and brother in law making love on the bed when they both knew rohit is married and Tanya is expecting?! Even if it was a situation like rohit lured pari into it, there is absolutely NOTHING to justify this sinful crime. Pari and Rohan both should be disowned.

And then you said you didn't like how sonakshi didn't help the situation to calm, instead she gave her gyaan about how " her mamma" is being treated rudely by parayi Pari. Hold up! Please help me understand, is it a crime that sonakshi has started considering rohits mom as her own that she stood up for her when that brat of a pari started disrespecting veena by talking shit about her and her parvarish and that she has no right to slap her, not considering that she's of her mother's age and that she deserves respect?! In fact I'm mad that Sona didn't grab a stick to beat her sister black and blue and kick her out of the house right there and then.

Another thing I would like to point out from your post, you said u don't like sonakshi's jaap about "my family" to everybody and that u didn't like how she told suman to not come to the party. Milli, suman, pari they're her FIRST family. She will never feel the same right she has over them on the sippys no matter how much she says they're HER family and no matter how much she embraces them. Asking her mother not to come to the party - maybe it didn't sound right but any sane mom would UNDERSTAND why her daughter might ha e asked her not to. It doesn't mean that sonakshi doesn't understand sumans concern about sonakshi that she just barged into the Sippy mansion and accused the sippys. It means that she's trying to calm what happened the night before, she's trying to put a balance.

Same with pari, none of the sippys have the kind of right sonakshi has over pari. None of the sippys can beat pari black and blue or disown her other than sonakshi and suman. So when u mentioned in your post that sonakshi is PROVING who's SIDE she is in, she in fact was proving the RIGHT she has over pari by giving her the lecture and slapping her bratty sister. sonakshi has never tried to chose the sippys over her own family because she lives in that house and she's the DIL. In fact she has always chosen her "side" by judging who is right and who's wrong. And I really think you should consider all these factors before bashing sonakshi's character in every post. in sorry if I sounded a bit harsh but I was merely trying to prove my point. I hope you don't take it to heart :)

Take a bow!! You justified every thing about sonakshi's character with proper example and facts. You even explained everything that I didn't agree to on her post loool👏

Originally posted by: LoveInAutumn26

Don't really wanna explain much on the latest episodes as I have said enough in the discussion forum. But I think you are really harsh on Sonakshi. Anything she does, you find faults in her, like how she slapped Pari and told her that both her and Rohan are at fault and she can't blame Rohan alone on this affair. Sona was absolutely right in this judgement, only her and Tanya were the sensible one to blame both Rohan and Pari, unlike Veena and Rohit. It seems like you extremely hate or are critical of Sona's character (whatever your reason is idk), but you give benefit of doubt, leeway to other characters, though they are equally at fault as Sona is.

Coming to Rohit, whatever he said, whether its in anger, in impulsiveness, doesn't justify it. Rohit literally questioned that his marriage to Sonakshi was a mistake. That is a huge coming from a husband. Think of it from Sona's POV.... the affair gets revealed, she literally minutes ago finds out about her Sister and BIL's affair and was busy consoling/taking care of Tanya, her SIL, when Veena should have done it (but instead she was out to Rastogis to settle her score with Suman), and she gets to hear all sorts of nonsense hurling from her husband. Why would Rohit even fualt Sona or just her family for the affair. What about his brother? Shouldn't his first approach been to confront his brother? Nope, instead he's busy blaming Sona. Should Sona have done the same? When Naren was spouting all sorts of crap about her character and her profession, should Sona have blamed Rohit for it because he belongs to a Sippy family? Should she have blamed rest of the Sippys? Would that have been fair on Rohit, to be judged for what his father says? Similarly, Rohit blaming Sona and her family for Pari's deeds are uncalled for. Neither Suman, nor Sona encouraged this affair. They are both on dark as are rest of the Sippys. You can justify it whatever way, but what Rohit said to Sona and what Veena did to Pari (instead of confronting her own son) were wrong and uncalled for.

Yes, I agree Sona shouldn't have lied to Rohit about Ajit's blackmailing, but even for that Rohit put her in that position, constantly telling her "my mom is the most imp for me, her happiness matters the most, she's the top most priority, I trust you to protect my mom and this family (his convo with YK/Nishi)". Though I believe even though Rohit said all this, Sona should have still confided in him, but I don't fully blame her for not doing it either.

In anyway, this whole situation could have been handled better if both communicated with each other. As simple as that.

No offense meant!

Beautiful 👏 yours and mushfika's comments spoke for all of us who don't agree about the bashing of sonakshi in the post. Agree with each and every point u made. 🤗

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

I never believe hiding secrets and I won't tolerate it also .hiding secrets is the root cause if all probs we see in society now

I tell my children always one thing .be transparent .even if u do a wrong be transparent don't hide .

If u r used to being transparent automatically u will stop doing scummiest things ..

When ever u tell a lie u should feel.uneasy ..if u bought up like that u won't be a scum

If u r used to hiding from.parents tomorrow u will hide from spouse too

Any how for me if I am transparent I will have a hearty light feeling and I will have a good sleep and I am trying my children to be bought up like that

Truth hurts only once .lie and hiding and deceit hurts u multiple times that's my.motto I tell that to my kids

Sona lied..her fault! Ok! She had her own reasons! But still her fault! Ok!

Rohit also lied to sona and the whole family! He could have also told sona about pari bieng the culprit on leaking tge news! He saw ppl blaming puja after a certain point for puja's condition, he saw sona crying, blaming herself and bieng guilty for no fault of hers atleat then he could have told her! Did pari got punished for what she did? No! It all might have started as a small revenge thing but it became huge! The thing that she used to take revenge was not small! Puja tried commiting suicide and possibly could have died..still did he told anyone? No! Still nobody at sippys know that it was pari who let the secret out! He could have told veena the truth about naren way back when he came to know! It would have hurt her once but all this mess wouldn't have happened and probably their relationships would have been at a far better stage! Did rohit tell sonakshi about rani and the plan?? Even after knowing about his bua's sick plan he was angry on sonakshi and even fought for her! He knew she was bieng used as a bait by everyone and everyone in that damn family blamed ger for bringing rani home..he knew it was all his stupid bua's plan..did he tell anyone about the truth? No! Because he had his own reasons!!

And lets not talk about all the lies nishi and yk have fed everyone! From rohit to sonakshi to veena to puja and everyone else in the family too! And they have been doing that from the past 21 yrs! They lied about puja bieng adopted to puja first, then about rani bieng her mother to everyone and then to justify their lie so many lies were spoken! They have been hiding about naren from everyone for so long! Why? Because they had their own reasons! They coukd have also told everyone the truth! But they didn't because they had reasons! Nisgi told sonakshi that she hid about this because naren told her and promused her that he won't repeat and she trusted him! Sona did the same!

Weren't u the one who once mentioned that nishi-yk should have simply told puja that her biological parents died? Or she was picked from a dustbin or smthg? Why? Wasn't that a lie? They could have told her the truth..it eould have hurt her once but eventually things would have settled! Because they had their own reasons!

So my question is if other chars can ve understood and even if wrong things saud in the fit of rage can be justified by calling it "in the heat of the moment" or "impulsive" then y so critical when it comes to sonakshi!

Originally posted by: Shanayass

but dosen't tge same theory applies to other chars??

Sona lied..her fault! Ok! She had her own reasons! But still her fault! Ok!

Rohit also lied to sona and the whole family! He could have also told sona about pari bieng the culprit on leaking tge news! He saw ppl blaming puja after a certain point for puja's condition, he saw sona crying, blaming herself and bieng guilty for no fault of hers atleat then he could have told her! Did pari got punished for what she did? No! It all might have started as a small revenge thing but it became huge! The thing that she used to take revenge was not small! Puja tried commiting suicide and possibly could have died..still did he told anyone? No! Still nobody at sippys know that it was pari who let the secret out! He could have told veena the truth about naren way back when he came to know! It would have hurt her once but all this mess wouldn't have happened and probably their relationships would have been at a far better stage! Did rohit tell sonakshi about rani and the plan?? Even after knowing about his bua's sick plan he was angry on sonakshi and even fought for her! He knew she was bieng used as a bait by everyone and everyone in that damn family blamed ger for bringing rani home..he knew it was all his stupid bua's plan..did he tell anyone about the truth? No! Because he had his own reasons!!

And lets not talk about all the lies nishi and yk have fed everyone! From rohit to sonakshi to veena to puja and everyone else in the family too! And they have been doing that from the past 21 yrs! They lied about puja bieng adopted to puja first, then about rani bieng her mother to everyone and then to justify their lie so many lies were spoken! They have been hiding about naren from everyone for so long! Why? Because they had their own reasons! They coukd have also told everyone the truth! But they didn't because they had reasons! Nisgi told sonakshi that she hid about this because naren told her and promused her that he won't repeat and she trusted him! Sona did the same!

Weren't u the one who once mentioned that nishi-yk should have simply told puja that her biological parents died? Or she was picked from a dustbin or smthg? Why? Wasn't that a lie? They could have told her the truth..it eould have hurt her once but eventually things would have settled! Because they had their own reasons!

So my question is if other chars can ve understood and even if wrong things saud in the fit of rage can be justified by calling it "in the heat of the moment" or "impulsive" then y so critical when it comes to sonakshi!

@bold- exactly my point.

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

Is she striving for Noble peace home award or what .she pokes in matters that are not at all necessary i.e which working woman wants all the issues of a joint family seriously ...that's why we blame her for her mahaan deeds

Which working lady quits her job bcos her snobbish FIL says he won't talk to her .isn't it a blessing in real for a snobbish fellow to not interact with u any.more .

Mahaan deeds are not natural .Sona is not natural

Whats with you and the words mahaan lol. And even if sonakshi is being mahaan with her acts, why do we have so much problem with that. Some ppl are like that, they love to sacrifice, they're very selfless. And it doesn't seem natural because they're are a VERY people in this world who are like that ok. Also, don't forget that she's the female lead of the shwo and so her character is supposed to consist of selflessness and sacrifices. Idk why this is so hard for anyone to understand...