23rd March 1931 Tribute to Martyrs Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdev

history_geek thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago
#1


Hi all.

Today is 23rd March 2015.
On this day, in 1931, 3 Indian revolutionaries were hanged in the Lahore Central Jail.

Sardar Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev.
Their sacrifice shook the British Edifice in India.

You all must be aware of the case already.
Lots of movies have been made in this regard.

This post is in remembrance of the same people.
I was reading about them. Hence thought of sharing it here also.
So, I have simply copied material from online articles, which i was going through.
You may find it worth reading.


Edited by history_geek - 10 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

19

Views

6.7k

Users

11

Likes

141

Frequent Posters

history_geek thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago
#2


An article published in The Hindu..


When the Supreme Court of India established a museum to display landmarks in the history of India's judicial system, it also put on display records of some historic trials. The first exhibition that was organised was the Trial of Bhagat Singh.' It was opened on September 28, 2007, on the occasion of the birth centenary celebrations of one of the most significant among martyrs and popular heroes. Noorul Hooda, Curator of the Museum, and Rajmani Srivastava of the National Archives worked to collect documents, items like bomb shell remains, pictures and publications. Not all of what was collected could be displayed in the exhibition. In 2008, the Supreme Court digitalised the exhibits. Some of Bhagat Singh's rare writings thus came to light for the first time since he was executed on March 23, 1931 at the Lahore Central Jail along with Rajguru and Sukhdev. How the three young patriots were put to judicial murder, is brought out by the eminent legal scholar, A.G. Noorani, in his book, The Trial of Bhagat Singh " Politics of Justice.

The most significant part of Bhagat Singh's life is that spent in jail since his arrest on April 8, 1929 from the Central Assembly in Delhi, where he and B.K. Dutt offered themselves to be arrested after throwing harmless bombs in the Assembly to make the deaf hear.' They faced two trials. The first was in the Delhi bomb case. It started on May 7, 1929 in Delhi and was committed to the Sessions Judge, on charges under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and the Explosives Act. That trial started in June. Bhagat Singh and Dutt made a historic statement on June 6. Dutt was represented by the nationalist counsel Asaf Ali. Bhagat Singh fought his own case with the help of a legal adviser.

On June 12, in less than a week, both were convicted and transported for life. From the June 6 statement to his last letter to his comrades written on March 22, 1931, a day before his execution, Bhagat Singh read and wrote so much: one can only marvel at the explosion of talent at the age of 21 years-plus. He wrote letters to family members and friends, jail and court officials, and penned major articles including Why I am an Atheist, Letter to Young Political Workers, and Jail Notebook.



The photograph of Bhagat Singh and B.K. Dutt was taken by Sham Lal in Delhi on April 4, 1929 and sent for publication to newspapers by Bhagat Singh's comrades.

On June 14, after the conviction, Bhagat Singh was transferred to Mianwali and Dutt to the Lahore jail. That was the start of a chain of struggles throughout the period they were in jail. It began with a hunger strike from June 15 by both Bhagat Singh and Dutt, demanding the status of political prisoners. Bhagat Singh was also shifted to Lahore jail after some time. He and Dutt were kept away from the other accused in the Lahore conspiracy case, such as Sukhdev. The trial in that case, related to the murder of Saunders, began on July 10, 1929. Bhagat Singh, who was on hunger strike since June 15 along with Dutt, was brought to the court on a stretcher. The other accused in the case came to know about this hunger strike on that day, and almost all of them joined the strike.



This historic hunger strike by Bhagat Singh and his comrades resulted in the martyrdom of Jitender Das on September 13, 1929. Bhagat Singh and the other comrades ended their hunger strike on September 2 after receiving assurances from a Congress party team and British officials on the acceptance of their demands, but they resumed it on September 4 as the British officials went back on their word. It finally ended on October 4 after 112 days, though the status of "political prisoner" was still not given; some other demands were acceded to.

During the Lahore conspiracy case trial conducted by Special Magistrate Rai Sahib Pandit Kishan Chand, an incident occurred on October 21, 1929. Provoked by an approver named Jai Gopal, Prem Dutt, the youngest among the accused persons, threw a slipper at him. Despite the other accused dissociating themselves from the act, the magistrate ordered the handcuffing of all of them. Bhagat Singh, Shiv Verma, B.K. Dutt, Bejoy Kumar Sinha, Ajoy Ghosh, Prem Dutt and others were beaten after they refused to be handcuffed. They were treated brutally inside the jail and at the court gate in front of the magistrate. Ajoy Ghosh and Shiv Verma fell unconscious following the police brutality. Bhagat Singh was targeted by a British officer by name Roberts.

The details of the brutalities were recorded by Bejoy Kumar Sinha. In February 1930, Bhagat Singh resumed his hunger strike for 15 days, as the British officials did not fulfil the promises they had made earlier with respect to demands.

Meanwhile, the fame of revolutionaries, arising from their hunger strikes and court statements, soared, while the image of the British was at its lowest ebb. The case drew attention the world over. While dismissing appeals from Bhagat Singh and Dutt against the Delhi bomb case judgment, the Punjab High Court in Lahore acknowledged Bhagat Singh to be a Sincere Revolutionary.'

The British colonial regime led by Viceroy Irwin took the unprecedented step of issuing the Lahore conspiracy case ordinance on May 1, 1930. Under this, the proceedings that were being conducted by a Special Magistrate in Lahore were transferred to a three-judge Special Tribunal established to complete them within a fixed period. The Tribunal's judgment was not to be challenged in the superior courts; only the Privy Council could hear any appeal. This ordinance was never approved by the Central Assembly or the British Parliament, and it lapsed later without any legal or constitutional sanctity. Its only purpose was to hang Bhagat Singh in the shortest possible time. That judgment sentencing Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and Rajguru to the gallows was delivered on October 7, 1930.

The Tribunal began its proceedings on May 5, 1930. The accused in the Lahore conspiracy case refused to attend the proceedings after May 12. On that day they raised slogans and sung revolutionary songs. Brutalities were repeated on them, as in October 1929, in front of the Special Magistrate. This time Ajoy Ghosh, Kundan Lal and Prem Dutt fell unconscious. The accused remained absent during the whole proceedings and remained unrepresented by counsel. Advocates engaged to defend them were insulted by the Tribunal. Subsequently, the accused themselves directed them not to defend them in their absence. These details are in A.G. Noorani's book, The Trial of Bhagat Singh.

What remained out of view all these years were the many letters that Bhagat Singh wrote and the petitions he sent to either the jail authorities or to the Special Tribunal or to the Punjab High Court, during the period 1929-1930. In these letters and petitions, Bhagat Singh sought to expose the British colonial regime's determined efforts to get him hanged by denying the accused any defence during the trial. Even though the accused were choosing not to be present in the court, they were participating in the legal proceedings through counsel. The Tribunal refused the revolutionaries' counsel, Amolak Ram Kapoor, permission to cross-examine 457 prosecution witnesses and allowed the cross-examination of only five approvers. This was a farce.

The letters reveal another hunger strike by Bhagat Singh from July 28, 1930, on which he himself informed the High Court it was against the jail rules. He was joined in the hunger strike by Kundan Lal, Prem Dutt Verma, Sukhdev and Bejoy Kumar Sinha. This hunger strike continued till at least August 22. With this, the total period of hunger strikes observed during his nearly two-year incarceration becomes about five months. Probably this is more than the total period of Mahatma Gandhi's hunger strikes during his prolonged political career starting from South Africa.

When the court finally allowed interviews as sought by Bhagat Singh to prepare his defence, and when he asked for an adjournment of the case, the court closed the proceedings without giving any chance to defence counsel to cross-examine prosecution witnesses or present defence witnesses. Then it reserved judgment, which was delivered on October 7, 1930.

More such documents might emerge. The compilation of the complete proceedings of the Delhi Assembly bomb case and the Special Magistrate Court's proceedings could bring more facts to light. The Punjab Archives in Lahore has 135 files of the Bhagat Singh case. These are not accessible even to Pakistani scholars; Kuldip Nayar is now trying to get access to them. In 2006, at the time of the 75th anniversary of the martyrdom of Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev, the Acting Chief Justice of the Pakistan Supreme Court, Rana Bhagwan Dass, handed over to the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Chandigarh four volumes of exhibits of the Lahore conspiracy case. These included some new documents.

While the source of the documents in the Supreme Court records is not clearly mentioned, undoubtedly these are part of the trial proceedings at both levels. The letters, self-explanatory in the context of the freedom struggle, show the amazing command Bhagat Singh had over the English language, apart from Urdu, Hindi and Punjabi, his knowledge of legal terminology and his beautiful handwriting. In the book, Gandhi and Bhagat Singh, historian V.N. Dutta expressed doubts about Bhagat Singh's command over English as he was an under-graduate. He sought to ascribe the language to Jawaharlal Nehru or Asaf Ali. For legal professionals, scholars and students, the letters present a wonderful experience of how Bhagat Singh had such maturity in complex matters of legal defence.

But Bhagat Singh's very talent and competence scared the British colonial regime and it became even more determined to get rid of him.

The Supreme Court's digitalised records include nearly 20 written Bhagat Singh documents. Some of these, such as the June 6, 1929 statement, Ideal of Indian Revolution,' have been published. Only 12 letters or petitions remain unpublished. This writer acknowledges the permission granted by the Supreme Court to do so. Ten of the documents are in complete form. Only the first page remains of two letters/documents, one relating to the October 21, 1929 incident in court and another petition from early-1930; the second and likely final page in these two are not in the digital records. Also available now is a photograph of Bhagat Singh and Dutt, published in Bande Matram', Lahore (on April 12, 1929) and Hindustan Times (April 18, 1929). This was taken by photographer Sham Lal of Kashmere Gate in Delhi on April 4, 1929 and sent to newspapers for publication by Bhagat Singh's comrades. The writer is grateful to the National Archives, New Delhi, for providing the rare newspaper photographs.!.

history_geek thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago
#3

From TOI

Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev, who were condemned to death by the Lahore Special tribunal in connection with the murder of Mr Sanders, Assistant superintendent of police, Lahore, were hanged at 8pm today in the local Central Jail.
The bodies were sent out for cremation. The relatives were not informed.




OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT (Through Associated Press)

It is officially announced that Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev were hanged to death on the evening of March 23. Their remains were cremated according to Sikh and Hindu rites on the banks of the Sutlej River and the remains thrown in the same river.

NO LEAVE TO APPEAL TO PRIVY COUNCIL

A large number of persons collected outside the High Court where two petitions in connection with the execution of Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sekhdev were heard today.

Mr Justice Bhide declined to hear the petition... on the ground that he had already expressed opinion on a similar petition, but expressed his willingness to hear the other petition ... to appeal to the Privy council against Mr Justice Bhide's decision that the condemned prisoners were legally detained by government.

The application seeking permission to appeal to the Privy Council against Mr Justice Bhide's former decision, namely, that the condemned prisoners were legally detained by the government , was rejected by Mr Justice Bhide.

(Earlier TOI reports also showed attempts by counsel to save the trio.)

'EFFORTS TO SAVE HIM'

Lahore, March 21. The Defence Committee is making frantic efforts to save Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev from the gallows. Two applications were filed in the Lahore High Court today.

The first application seeks permission for appeal to the Privy Council against the decision of Mr Justice Bhide, namely, that the Local Government was right under the law in keeping the condemned prisoners in custody. The second application under 'Habeas Corpus' tries to establish that Government does not possess the power to execute the prisoners.

NO PETITION FOR MERCY

Sir Alan Broadway: Did the petitioners put in petitions for mercy? Government advocate: The petitioners didn't themselves put in petitions. They, however, put in a petition that they be shot dead instead of being hanged. Defence Counsel: That's another kind of mercy. Sir Alan: You call that a mercy petition?

Defence counsel submitted that the prisoners be set at liberty. The Justice s rejected the Habeas Corpus application.

Gandhi's tribute & a warning

Mr Gandhi, prior to his departure for Karachi, in course of a statement on the execution of Bhagat Singh and his comrades said: "The execution of such a youth and his comrades has given them the crown of martyrdom. Thousands feel today personally bereaved by this death. Whilst, therefore, I can associate with all the tributes that can be paid to the memory of these young patriots, I warn the youth of the country against copying their examples. Let us by all means copy their capacity for sacrifice, their industry, their reckless courage; but let us not use these qualities as they did. The deliverance of this country must not be through murder.

FATHER'S TELEGRAM

The jail authorities having refused permission to allow relatives beyond the father, mother, sisters and brothers to interview Bhagat Singh, the interview did not take place today. Bhagat Singh's father has telegraphed his protest to the Viceroy, the Governor of the Punjab and the Home Member of the Punjab Government. (Earlier) a public meeting was held on the Chaupatty Sands, Bombay ... speeches were made protesting against the execution...

'SORROW, BUT ALSO PRIDE'

I have remained silent, though I felt like bursting and now all is over. Not all of us could save him who was so dear to us and whose magnificent courage and sacrifice have been an inspiration to the youth of India. India today cannot even save her dearly loved children from the gallows. "... there will be sorrow in the land at our utter helplessness; but there will also be pride in him who is no more and when England speaks to us and talks of a settlement there will be the corpse of Bhagat Singh between us lest we forget".

history_geek thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago
#4
From Indian Law Journal...

http://indialawjournal.com/volume1/issue_3/bhagat_singh.html



The Trial of Bhagat Singh

Backdrop

Bhagat Singh is one of India's greatest freedom fighters. The youth of India were inspired by Bhagat Singh's call to arms and enthused by the defiance of the army wing of the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association to which he Sukhdev and Rajguru, belonged. His call, Inquilab Zindabad! became the war-cry of the fight for freedom. Bhagat Singh was executed by the British after a sham trial for his involvement in the Lahore Conspiracy Case at the age of twenty-three on 23 March, 1931.

On April 8, 1929, Bhagat Singh and B.K. Dutt threw a bomb in the Central Legislative Assembly "to make the deaf hear" as their leaflet described the reason for their act. As intended, nobody was hurt by the explosion as Bhagat Singh had aimed the bomb carefully, to land away from the seated members, on the floor. The bomb, deliberately of low intensity, was thrown to protest the repressive Public Safety Bill and Trades Dispute Bill and the arrest of 31 labour leaders in March 1929. Then a shower of leaflets came fluttering down from the gallery like a shower of leaves and the members of the Assembly heard the sound of, Inquilab Zindabad!' and Long live Proletariat!' rent the air.

Bhagat Singh and B.K.Dutt let themselves be arrested, even when they could have escaped, to use their court appearances as a forum for revolutionary propaganda to advocate the revolutionaries' point of view and, in the process, rekindle patriotic sentiments in the hearts of the people. Bhagat Singh surrendered his automatic pistol, the same one he had used to pump bullets into Saunder's body, knowing fully well that the pistol would be the highest proof of his involvement in the Saunders' case.

The authorities believed that in Bhagat Singh they had caught a big fish and that he was the mastermind behind all revolutionary activity in India. The government was, however, intrigued by the two revolutionaries giving themselves up so easily. The British did not want to take any chances, so even the summons to the two revolutionaries were delivered to them in jail.

Trial

The style and format of the writing in the handbills struck British intelligence as suspiciously familiar. The format and style in these handbills was similar to the style and format of the handwritten posters that announced the murder of Saunders and which had been plastered on the city's walls. The British began to suspect that Bhagat Singh was one of Saunder's killers. He was singled out as the author of the text on the leaflets as well as on the posters. Bhagat Singh was charged with attempt to murder under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Asaf Ali, a member of the Congress Party was his lawyer.

The Trial started on 7 May, 1929. The Crown was represented by the public prosecutor Rai Bahadur Suryanarayan and the trial magistrate was a British Judge, P.B Pool. The manner in which the prosecution presented its case left Bhagat Singh in no doubt that the British were out to nail him. The prosecution's star witness was Sergeant Terry who said that a pistol had been found on Bhagat Singh's person when he was arrested in the Assembly. This was not factually correct because Bhagat Singh had himself surrendered the pistol while asking the police to arrest him. Even the eleven witnesses who said that they had seen the two throwing the bombs seemed to have been tutored.

Some of the questions asked in court were:

Judge: Were you present in the Assembly on the 8th of April, 1929?"

Bhagat Singh: As far as this case is concerned, I feel no necessity to make a statement at this stage. When I do, I will make the statement."

Judge: When you arrived in the court, you shouted, "Long Live Revolution!". What do you mean by it?'

As if it had already made up its mind, the court framed charges under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Exposive Substances Act. Bhagat Singh and Dutt were accused of throwing bombs to kill or cause injuries to the King Majesty's subjects'. The magistrate committed both of the revolutionaries' to the sessions court, which was presided over by Judge Leonard Middleton. The trial started in the first week of June, 1929. Here also, Bhagat Singh and Dutt were irked by the allegation that they had fired shots from a gun. It was apparent that the government was not limiting the case to the bombs thrown in the Assembly. It was introducing extraneous elements to ferret out more information about the revolutionary party and its agenda.

However, Judge Leonard Middleton too swallowed the prosecution story. He accepted as proof of the verbal testimony that the two had thrown the bombs into the Assembly Chamber and even said that Bhagat Singh fired from his pistol while scattering the leaflets there. The court held that both Bhagat Singh and Dutt were guilty under Section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1988 and were sentenced to life imprisonment. Judge Middleton rules that he had no doubt that the defendant's acts were deliberate' and rejected the plea that the bombs were deliberately low-intensity bombs since the impact of the explosion had shattered the wood of one and a half inch thickness in the Assembly.

The two were persuaded to file an appeal which was rejected and they were sent for fourteen years. The judge was in a hurry to close the case and claimed that the police had gathered substantial evidence' against Bhagat Singh and that he was charged with involvement in the killings of Saunders and Head Constable Chanan Singh and that the authorities had collected nearly 600 witnesses to establish their charges against him which included his colleagues, Jai Gopal and Hans Raj Vohra turning government approvers.

Bhagat Singh was sent to Mianwali Jail and Dutt to Borstal Jail in Lahore and were put on the same train though in different compartments on 12th March, 1930 but after requesting the officer on duty to allow them to sit together for some distance of the journey, Bhagat Singh conveyed to Dutt that he should go on a hunger strike on 15th June and that he would do the same in Mianwali Jail. When the Government realized that this fast had riveted the attention of the people throughout the country, it decided to hurry up the trial, which came to known as the Lahore Conspiracy Case. This trial started in Borstal Jial, Lahore, on 10 July, 1929. Rai Sahib Pandit Sri Kishen, a first class magistrate, was the judge for this trial. He earned the title of Rai Sahib for loyal service to the British. Bhagat Singh and twenty-seven others were charged with murder, conspiracy and wagering war against the King.

The revolutionaries' strategy was to boycott the proceedings. They showed no interest in the trial and adopted an attitude of total indifference. They did not have any faith in the court and realized that the court had already made up its mind. A handcuffed Bhagat Singh was still on hunger strike and had to be brought to the court in a stretcher and his weight had fallen by 14 pounds, from 133 to 119. The Jail Committee requested him to give up their hunger strike and finally it was his father who had his way and it was on the 116th day of his fast, on October 5, 1929 that he gave up his strike surpassing the 97 day world record for hunger strikes which set by an Irish revolutionary.

Bhagat Singh started refocusing on his trial. The crown was represented by the government advocate C.H.Carden-Noad and was assisted by Kalandar Ali Khan, Gopal Lal, and Bakshi Dina Nath who was the prosecuting inspector. The accused were defended by 8 different lawyers. The court recorded an order prohibiting slogans in the courtroom. The government advocate filed orders by the government sanctioning the prosecution under the Explosive Substances Act and Sections 121, 121 A, 122 and 123 of the Penal Code relating to sedition.

When Jai Gopal turned approver, Verma, the youngest of the accused, hurled a slipper at him. After this incident, the accused were subjected to untold slavery. The case built by the prosecution was that a revolutionary conspiracy had been hatched as far as back as September, 1928, two years before the murder of Saunders. The government alleged that various revolutionary parties had joined together to forge one organization in 1928 itself to operate in the north and the north-east of India, from Lahore to Calcutta.

The case proceeded at a snails pace and hence the government got so exasperated that it approached the Lahore High Court for directions to the magistrate. A division bench of the Lahore High Court dismissed the application of Carden-Noad. Through March, 1930, the proceedings were relatively smooth. The magistrate could not make any headway without the cooperation of the undertrials. On1 May, 1930, the viceroy, Lord Irwin, promulgated an Ordinance to set up a tribunal to try this case. The Ordinance, LCC Ordinance No.3 of 1930, was to put an end to the proceedings pending in the magistrate's court. The case was transferred to a tribunal of three high court judges without any right to appeal, except to the Privy Council.

The case opened on 5 May 1930 in the stately Poonch House. Rajguru challenged the very constitution of the tribunal and said that it was illegal ultra vires. According to him, the Viceroy did not have the power to cut short the normal legal procedure. The Government of India Act, 1915, authorized the Viceroy to promulgate an Ordinance to set up a tribunal but only when the situation demanded whereas now there was no breakdown in the law and order situation. The tribunal however, ruled that the petition was premature'. Carden-Noad, the government advocate elaborated on the charges which included dacoities, robbing money from banks and the collection of arms and ammunition. The evidence of G.T. Hamilton Harding, senior superintendent of police, took the court by surprise as he said that he had filed the FIR against the accused under the instructions of the chief secretary to the government of Punjab and he did not know the facts of the case. Then one of the accused J.N Sanyal said that they were not the accused but the defenders of India's honour and dignity.

There were five approvers in total put of which Jai Gopal, Hans Raj Vohra and P.N.Ghosh had been associated with the HRSA for a long time. It was on their stories that the prosecution relied. The tribunal depended on Section 9 (1) of the Ordinance and on 10th July 1930, issued an order, and copies of the framed charges were served on the fifteen accused in jail, together with copies of an order intimating them that their pleas would be taken on the charges the following day. This trial was a long and protracted one, beginning on 5 May, 1930, and ending on 10 September, 1930. It was a one-sided affair which threw all rules and regulations out of the window. Finally the tribunal framed charges against fifteen out of the eighteen accused. The case against B.K.Dutt was withdrawn as he had already been sentenced to transportation for life in the Assembly Bomb Case.

On 7 October 1930, about three weeks before the expiry of its term, the tribunal delivered its judgement, sentencing Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and Rajguru to death by hanging. Others were sentenced to transportation for life and rigorous imprisonment. This judgement was a 300-page one which went into the details of the evidence and said that Bhagat Singh's participation in the Saunders' murder was the most serious and important fact proved against him and it was fully established by evidence. The warrants for the three were marked with a black border.

The undertrials of the Chittagong Armoury Raid Case sent an appeal to Gandhiji to intervene. A defence committee was constituted in Punjab to file an appeal to the Privy Council against the sentence. Bhagat Singh did not favour the appeal but his only satisfaction was that the appeal would draw the attention of people in England to the existence of the HSRA. In the case of Bhagat Singh v. The King Emperor, the points raised by the appellant was that the ordinance promulgated to constitute a special tribunal for the trial was invalid. The government argued that Section 72 of the Government of India Act, 1915 gave the governor-general unlimited powers to set up a tribunal. Judge Viscount Dunedin who read the judgment dismissed the appeal. Thus from the lower court to the tribunal to the Privy Council, it was a preordained judgement in flagrant violation of all tends of natural justice and a fair and free trial..


PutijaChalhov thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 10 years ago
#5

PutijaChalhov thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 10 years ago
#6




See this for Shaheed Divas Martyrs day

http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/introductions-greetings/20353-shaheed-divas-martyrs-day-23rd-march.html

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdOgkD18Fco[/YOUTUBE]


Edited by PutijaChalhov - 10 years ago
RadhikaS0 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#7
Abhay
Thanks for reminding me about this golden day when these 3 young men sacrificed their lives for the cause of India's freedom. You have shared some excellent articles. 👏 My salute to these bravehearts who will always live in our hearts as our pride and our icons.

Just reading the articles is enough to make one shudder at the British brutality in condemning these youths to death without a fair trial. At the same time, it is an eye opener to discover that Bhagat Singh was so well versed in legalese. And a polyglot. What remarkable talent that could have transformed the political landscape of the Indian freedom struggle if only it had not been smothered so early!

5 months in 2 years is a long time to stay on hunger strike esp considering the difficulties they must have faced during their incarceration.

There will always be debate on whether Mahatma Gandhi tried to save them from the gallows using his influence with the British. Some people believe that he did not fully support their cause because they were accused of murder and Gandhiji could not let go of his ideals of ahimsa. On the other hand, there is no doubt that he openly valued their contribution and sacrifice. He met Lord Irwin to discuss the possibility of commuting of the death sentence but it was rejected by the Viceroy. Nehru seemed more understanding and recognized that Bhagat Singh had tried to vindicate the honor of Lala Lajpat Rai through his attack on Saunders, an act that resonated with the sentiments of millions of Indians. Nehru agreed that Bhagat Singh became famous not for his acts of "terrorism" but for being the symbol of hope for countless Indians who looked upon him as their hero for having the courage to withstand British brutality at a young age and sacrifice his life for the cause of freedom.

All this is my surmise only and neither do I not say that I am fully correct nor do I wish to hurt/offend anyone with my views.

Bhagat Singh and his comrades remain the symbols of courage and sacrifice to youth to this day. The words in blue are beautifully written:

I have remained silent, though I felt like bursting and now all is over. Not all of us could save him who was so dear to us and whose magnificent courage and sacrifice have been an inspiration to the youth of India. India today cannot even save her dearly loved children from the gallows. "... there will be sorrow in the land at our utter helplessness; but there will also be pride in him who is no more and when England speaks to us and talks of a settlement there will be the corpse of Bhagat Singh between us lest we forget".

@Putija: Thank you for sharing the pics / link. 😊
Edited by RadhikaS0 - 10 years ago
Sweetshruthi thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#8
Thank u so much Abhay for this remembrance thread.
The facts and findings brought out here are really inspiring and patriotic. Last year i visited Julianwalabagh memorial place in Amrithsir i could not control my tears...we can imagine the plight of the youth of that genere...You have brought out very good article. The real and true homage to Bhagat Singh Sukhdev and Rajguru will be doing our works with sincierity towards the India dreamed by them.
Sweetshruthi thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#9
Thanks @ putija for sharing the links
chitterati thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#10
Awe and Respect...true heroes of India & Pakistan.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".