Jodha is hero and jalal is begum !!!

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Antara123

@Antara123

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#71

guys. there is a difference between bashing and criticism. some people are blunt in their views. some are diplomatic. the blunt truths we hate but they actually make a lot of sense. just dont blame someone coz he or she is blunt saying i did not like this episode. why are you bringing women empowerment and all here? the discussion is on what powers jalal as a king holds. if you agree to disagree all matters solved. we arent spreading negativity. some truths are bitter. will we be buried in an ocean of lies because we cant face the truth? this is what leads to closure of threads like abhay's. some people disagreed. couldnt bear the truths. now i dont know why... they never said anything against jodha or jalal. just facts. still people complained. god knows whats happening here.

Quote

bokul

@bokul

Master

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#72

jalal will be back with a bang

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

shreya roy

@munni_rajatfan

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#73

excuse me. so u feel only abhay is the real historian & others dont know anything??? for ur information my mom is a history prof MA phd. & she is big time disappointed with the track. if people r posting views about jalal's character whts the prob???

Quote

Mihrimah Ahmed

@ShadeOfWhite

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#74

Originally posted by: munnirony
excuse me. so u feel only abhay is the real historian & others dont know anything??? for ur information my mom is a history prof MA phd. & she is big time disappointed with the track. if people r posting views about jalal's character whts the prob???

dear we r not talking anything about Jalal..at least I am not.

I agree Jalal is made fool in this track and I hate that...I dont think anyone enjoying seeing tortured Jalal...he is the greatest and always will be...❤️dont get worked up..we r talking abt something else.

Quote

Sara

@smile.sara

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#75

Originally posted by: myviewprem
do not bother
do not waste precious time getting upset over some fictional serial just named after Akbar and his wife Jodha. I watch episodes only for the acting not for this crap story getting PR in name of historical.

next they may show jodha ordering adham thrown off from the terrace steps for killing atagah

so what world knows real history

and after a few few years all shall forget jodha and remember only Akbar the great. I did not know Akbar had a wife from amer called jodha till movie jodha akbar or about ruqaiah salima till serial. The same will happen in future

Do we remember Ashoka's wife or lover in that movie of SRK or Chandragupta maurya wife? No

Same thing will happen once this serial closes

Only Akbar shall be remembered in history not Jodha, Ruqaiah, Salima etc because his achievements were such

Absolutely right I came across a comment on forum and I love the so pasting with permission

Originally posted by: amber09
I don't think
she is glorified ... Or Akbar is degrading ... Yes they are trying to show them like this ... But ,... Akbar is Akbar ..try to type Akbar whether u r using any browser , any software after ak... Auto corrects give u Akbar at once, write Akbar with small a they show it error with capital A suggestion...

So all over the world libraries are well equipped with books 0n Akbar the great ...

And I don't think so jodha is looking great ... She is looking a cartoon character who can do any thing can get any thing any where by any mean ... To learn war fare is one thing to become experience warrior by fighting in real war fields for so long is another thing ...
I m not watching ... But here today after seeing u people feeling bad, I couldnt stop me to comment ... Pls Don't take ekta jalal and her supernatural jodha seriously ... Whole world know about Akbar the great and out side india / subcontinent forget About jodha no one knows about ekta

Quote

myviewprem

@myviewprem

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#76

Originally posted by: Donjas

Temples destroyed in Akbar's time. What blasphemy and you say that this serial is doing disservice to Akbar.

Ok, I have a deal with you. Give me one authentic historical record which says temples were destroyed in Akbar's time and I promise that not only will I tender to you a personal apology but I swear I will never comes to this forum again.

Forget religion, concentrate on the man, on his outlook on life. All the religious issues you bring in marriage matter only if the person cares about it, a person like Akbar made his own rules he didn't care what the ulema said.

And finally, I find it surprising that you have no belief in the achievements of Akbar and yet you are ready to tell everyone how this serial is debasing his image.

Jesuit father Monserrate has written in his travel letters that many hindu temples were destroyed and in its place tombs and shrines were built. This father was a tutor of Murad and taught him BIBLE.

During seige of Chittor many temples were destroyed by Mughal army

Prayag name was changed to Allahabad by Akbar only

Please read dalpat vilas a contemproray take on Akbar of that time.

Man Singh started constructing a temple in 1595 in Bengal and Akbar told him to make it a mosque instead

There are many historical evidences and writings about temples being destroyed in Akbar's regime. This continued in Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb regime too. Only Jehangir was liberal to not bother to destroy temples and build mosques. Except once he ordered a Lord vishnu incarnation diety to be destroyed as he found it offensive.

Akbar changed by only in his late 30s and still sometime because to please mughal nobels he allowed temples to be destroyed and even brough back jiyaza in between.

I know Akbar was a better king than others of his time but i am not blind to his faults and weakness too. I do not blind worship any human all human are grey not only good or only bad.

Edited by myviewprem - 11 years ago

Quote

RadhikaS0

@RadhikaS0

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#77

Pardon me for jumping in. But this is a discussion I cannot resist. 😊

Freedom of expression is what we have been asking from the mods.

Freedom of posting,
Freedom of choosing what we read and where

But unfortunately, freedom of expression is restricted to certain categories of topics only. FFs, daily threads, fan posts, even threads celebrating a change in the status of a member. 🤔

This freedom of expression doesn't extend to historical discussions. Oh, no! They are controlled and censored as if we were living in some communist regime. All such discussions must be held only on a particular thread or not at all. The reason perhaps is that if members share a thread, they will be more amiable with each other. Like a Rajshri banner "Hum Saath Saath Hain" movie. 😆

Really, how can so many members share a single thread to discuss different topics simultaneously? Is it possible to string all FFs together on the same thread? (That would make one helluva FF though.)