Guys help req. When did MA 'really' die ? Re-opened 4 discussion - Page 3

Originally posted by: deejagi

</div>
<div>

Yaar even though she might hve added some spice to keep the show's popularity, she is infact following almost all teh historical facts. So I have no doubt on Maham & Adham's death in teh near future, even if it takes some few more episodes.

don't know but my experience with ekta's shows is saying cvs won't let her to go so soon.

Originally posted by: nabiii

Dude,this is Kekta's serial n 1st of all we have to keep in mind it always..n in her serial definitely most of the times villain wl remain busy making jalebi's paach(seperation,fight, quarrel, anti amicable relationship) amid main leads therefore in the way maham is the real hindrance amid jj..for continuing trp audiences interest obviously cvs won't let to go maham easily b/c without maham any kind of tom dick n harry( ruq,adham,sharif) type villain has no quality to keep standing her/himself as villain in this show properly..hence maham was/is/will b remained in JA for a long period in future also..

nabiii,

i share similar feelings. But kekta is showing the events which happened in history in CORE. Just she is spicing up things. And be assured next track is going to eliminate maham only... 😊.. But again m asking same things..where v read about maham's death date..?? Reference.!!is it same blochmann's version of akbarnama.?

I am re-quoting here same comment...

Originally posted by: jshweta16

shweta i NEVER write anything on forum until its 1000 pcent authentic. Neither i exxagerate.lol..

Do u feel i'll take this trouble of asking this question when almost everyone accepts ma died in 'that' manner and only after few months of ja-jo wedding..

I have got something and so m asking references from u all guys..??...

Originally posted by: history_geek

nabiii,

i share similar feelings. But kekta is showing the events which happened in history in CORE. Just she is spicing up things. And be assured next track is going to eliminate maham only... 😊.. But again m asking same things..where v read about maham's death date..?? Reference.!!is it same blochmann's version of akbarnama.?

ya according to ur research we won't deny every track is based on history in JA till date..but did cvs follow ever time distance in story line according to history yet? Do we know largely now how many months of jj's marriage cvs consider? Who knows! Perhaps, history's 4 months is cvs's 4 years in show due to add extra spicy in story line.lol

I don't think Akbar ever learnt about MA's real nature. Or he was an exceptionally tolerant person. Otherwise why would he get MA and Ak's tombs built?

Originally posted by: nabiii

ya according to ur research we won't deny every track is based on history in JA till date..but did cvs follow ever time distance in story line according to history yet? Do we know largely now how many months of jj's marriage cvs consider? Who knows! Perhaps, history's 4 months is cvs's 4 years in show due to add extra spicy in story line.lol

Yep Nabiii..
Right now somewhere late 1562 or early 1563. (forget MA for time being..)
And, this timeline is the reason i am asking all about MA's death..😉..
Just wait. I want few more opinions from members here...😊
Will disclose then..!..It's something VERY interesting...

u have given right facts , Abhay..

Originally posted by: adianasr

Abhay, though the translation of Akbarnama does give AK death as 16th May 1562 and MA as 25th June 1562, one reason why I have for doubting this is that it is also documented that Akbar was free of all such parasitical influences by 1564.

And there is one very interesting fact - Akbar abolished the toll tax for the non-muslims for visiting their religious shrines in 1563 which would be possible only after MA and AK are out of the picture. In my view, one reason for Akbar keeping MA close is that she could have created rebellion against him using the religion card since she was a kattar unlike the liberal Akbar. Hence I do believe it is possible that the year recorded as 1562 in Akbarnama may be off by 1 year and it may be 1563. Also Abul Fazl joined Abkar's court after 1566-67. So his dates for events before may be slightly off.

Adi,
Exactly, Maham was suspiciously/certainly alive even after 1562...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....

I am getting highly skeptical of Akbarnama now...though it gives, 16 may and 25 june...1562...but these are disputed highly..!!

i checked royal chronicles and all said something other story about MA...
Seems Maham is right fully alive in show now..!!!!.

I am procuring more docs to give weight to my theory...! Will post then...
I was waiting someone to say something on this issue...

Thnx ,,,