Fact and Fiction - about upcoming Adham spoiler

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Shraddha

@lashy

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#21

Originally posted by: BornThisWay
[
Ruquiya's case is slightly different, she didn't marry a very old person, Jalal was underage too.

Even here the case isn't MASSIVELY different...

if the girl is 14...adham would technically be 23 since he was only 1-2 years older to Jalal 😆 so by us zamaanaa's times they were VERY WELL age- matched 😆

Its another issue that Chetan Hansraj doesn't look 23😆

Edited by lashy - 11 years ago

Quote

732482

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#22

Originally posted by: Autumn_Rose

Awesome post 👍🏼

Let me get married and come back 😆

Abhi aayi.. shaaadi karke..

🤣

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

111192

@111192

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#23

Originally posted by: lashy

Thats what I'm trying to say...her own brothers/cousins would have been children when they married children too..and BD also had more than 1 wife...so, this track doesn't make sense😕 Just because Adham is a villain this track can slip through the loopholes!

Ruqaiyya was 8-9 when she got married...it was the norm then!

Bharmal had more wives apart from mainvati😲...also how come Jodha was unmarried till the age of 20-21 that also in those times...humari nakchadi Jodha sab ko reject karti rehti hongi😆

Quote

pallavi003

@pallavi003

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#24

though It is based on 16th century but it doesn't follow all the norms of a 16th century, rather more or less many staffs are much from 21st century, like fake preggo, hamsakal and all, so why bother your grey cells di..😆 Just sit and enjoy whatever they feed us,,😆😉..

Anyway actually I think they are trying to give a social message via this track, but unfortunately considering 16th century it seems a bit odd..

Quote

Shraddha

@lashy

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#25

Originally posted by: elasingh
Lashy Akbar passed a law abt the minimum age of marriage ...he also [passed law against sati...they are showing right track...

Ela...I'm not sure...but, I think his law would have referred to girls under 8-9...

13-14 was quite common then and even after then for girls to get married😕

Quote

732482

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#26

Originally posted by: lashy

Even here the case isn't MASSIVELY different...
if the girl is 14...adham would technically be 23 since he was only 1-2 years older to Jalal 😆 so by us zamaanaa's times they were VERY WELL age- matched 😆

Its another issue that Chetan Hansraj doesn't look 23😆

I was actually considering Adham to be of Chetan's age, thanks for bursting the bubble. 🤣😛

Quote

Alakh

@Autumn_Rose

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#27

Originally posted by: lashy

Even here the case isn't MASSIVELY different...
if the girl is 14...adham would technically be 23 since he was only 1-2 years older to Jalal 😆 so by us zamaanaa's times they were VERY WELL age- matched 😆

Its another issue that Chetan Hansraj doesn't look 23😆

Hamida was married to Humayun when she was 13 and he was in his 30s. Plus, she was in love with Hindal Mirza. Jalal was born to her when she was 15..

I want Jodha's reaction on this information😆

Quote

AbHer_neha

@AbHer_neha

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#28

Originally posted by: elasingh
Lashy Akbar passed a law abt the minimum age of marriage ...he also [passed law against sati...they are showing right track...

That's what I think...the purpose of this track may be to build Jalal's image as a social reformer...

Quote

pallavi003

@pallavi003

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#29

Originally posted by: lashy

Even here the case isn't MASSIVELY different...
if the girl is 14...adham would technically be 23 since he was only 1-2 years older to Jalal 😆 so by us zamaanaa's times they were VERY WELL age- matched 😆

Its another issue that Chetan Hansraj doesn't look 23😆

^^ that's the point...😆😉..waise I am thinking Jodha herself got married at 20 , isn't it a late marriage considering the backdrop.. how did she remain unmarried up to early 20's..??

Quote

Ela Singh

@elasingh

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#30

Originally posted by: lashy

Ela...I'm not sure...but, I think his law would have referred to girls under 8-9...

13-14 was quite common then and even after then for girls to get married😕

girls minimum age was 14 ...so the only thing is that in this case girl is already 14...

Quote

1 2 3 4 5 ... 10

Fact and Fiction - about upcoming Adham spoiler - Page 3

Related Topics

Explore Topics