Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 22 Sep 2025 EDT
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 23rd Sept 2025
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 23, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
MOOH KHUL GAYA 23.9
ENTRY INTO RESORT 22.9
Why is Deepika ALWAYS the victim?
Katrina and Vicky officially announce her pregnancy!!!
Mardaani 3 Rani Mukherjee 27 Feb 2026
Anurag Kashyap disliked Chhaava
Anupama bags some Star Pariwaar Awards
Complaint Against The Ba***ds Of Bollywood
New timslot of Show
🏏Pakistan vs Sri Lanka, Super Four,15th Match (A2 v B1) Abu Dhabi🏏
Sonam Kapoor Announces Bollywood Comeback
Abhira is most pathetic character in gen4
OSO was based on Divya Bharti death?
Shah Rukh Khan, Rani & Vikrant at the National Film awards ceremony
For your statement, I can only give one answer - today for that instant Jalal showed that he was an emperor...and thats the harsh reality!😊
This is all fictional no doubt...however, if Jodha was indeed guilty, that would have been his verdict -> execution (I realize that the amount of investigation that went into accusing Jodha was minimal and that Jalal was being very strong-headed about it, BUT and a big BUT, in yesteryears it was not really a hard task framing and having someone else executed for it - even a royal!) With the amont of clues presented against Jodha, I can imagine many-a-royal would have met a sorry fate!😒Besides, a king's prime duty lies with the welfare of his kingdom... any king who honours that code remains successful...if a King gets embroiled in matters of the family he is bound to start losing his hold on the kingdom - even if he is a good king!For Jalal, the heir was very important for furthering his legacy and a purposeful murder of it was beyond comprehension...I agree that Jalal was being blinded by rage and not taking Hameeda's suggestions into consideration - but my argument is that many kings who're considered 'Great' today might have not even given their family such chances!History has shown that if a queen had been suspected of a crime (even if actually innocent)...she'd have been locked in a special dungeon and not allowed to meet anyone till the king's courtiers/ministers investigated the case...At least Jodha did receive some form of respite in her own room and she was able to meet with her brothers...
For your statement, I can only give one answer - today for that instant Jalal showed that he was an emperor...and thats the harsh reality!😊
This is all fictional no doubt...however, if Jodha was indeed guilty, that would have been his verdict -> execution (I realize that the amount of investigation that went into accusing Jodha was minimal and that Jalal was being very strong-headed about it, BUT and a big BUT, in yesteryears it was not really a hard task framing and having someone else executed for it - even a royal!) With the amont of clues presented against Jodha, I can imagine many-a-royal would have met a sorry fate!😒Besides, a king's prime duty lies with the welfare of his kingdom... any king who honours that code remains successful...if a King gets embroiled in matters of the family he is bound to start losing his hold on the kingdom - even if he is a good king!For Jalal, the heir was very important for furthering his legacy and a purposeful murder of it was beyond comprehension...I agree that Jalal was being blinded by rage and not taking Hameeda's suggestions into consideration - but my argument is that many kings who're considered 'Great' today might have not even given their family such chances!History has shown that if a queen had been suspected of a crime (even if actually innocent)...she'd have been locked in a special dungeon and not allowed to meet anyone till the king's courtiers/ministers investigated the case...At least Jodha did receive some form of respite in her own room and she was able to meet with her brothers...
For your statement, I can only give one answer - today for that instant Jalal showed that he was an emperor...and thats the harsh reality!😊
This is all fictional no doubt...however, if Jodha was indeed guilty, that would have been his verdict -> execution (I realize that the amount of investigation that went into accusing Jodha was minimal and that Jalal was being very strong-headed about it, BUT and a big BUT, in yesteryears it was not really a hard task framing and having someone else executed for it - even a royal!) With the amont of clues presented against Jodha, I can imagine many-a-royal would have met a sorry fate!😒Besides, a king's prime duty lies with the welfare of his kingdom... any king who honours that code remains successful...if a King gets embroiled in matters of the family he is bound to start losing his hold on the kingdom - even if he is a good king!For Jalal, the heir was very important for furthering his legacy and a purposeful murder of it was beyond comprehension...I agree that Jalal was being blinded by rage and not taking Hameeda's suggestions into consideration - but my argument is that many kings who're considered 'Great' today might have not even given their family such chances!History has shown that if a queen had been suspected of a crime (even if actually innocent)...she'd have been locked in a special dungeon and not allowed to meet anyone till the king's courtiers/ministers investigated the case...At least Jodha did receive some form of respite in her own room and she was able to meet with her brothers...
Before you read, This is strictly for die-hard and loyal fans of Pale Blue Dot ...our fellow PBDians ... I've been working on this since...
24