Well, Ela and Rose, if my choice for Jodha's knight errant, Mansingh, turns up trumps, no one would be happier than I. Even without that, he did me proud today with his detached wisdom and rational thought processes. But he does not have enough of insider knowledge of the palace routines and secrets, and so he will not be able to get anything done by himself.
I too think Mahaam will lend a helping hand, if only to prevent the blame from coming to her or Adham. Now she is the quintessential insider, and she could ferret out anything if she put her mind to it. I learnt from one source that it was Hoshiyar who had done it, but surely not acting on his/her own. There would have to be someone behind Hoshiyar, who is the one Ruqaiya wants to expose and punish.
Jalal does not seem to have started his investigation yet, but maybe he is going to rope in Bharmal to help with his knowledge of the Amer area where the ark could have been prepared. I must say, however, that his comment to his Minister about having invited Bharmal sounded ominous.
Yes, Jalal's saying they would be burnt alive in public if they were not proved innocent sounded horrible, but then those were brutal times. Blindings, severe torture, hanging, drawing and quartering, breaking convicts on the wheel, throwing them down an oubliette and leaving them, with broken bones, to die in pitch darkness, and lifelong imprisonment in horrible prisons without not just any hearing but even without any knowledge of the charges, under the infamous
lettres de cachet - some or all these charming practices were common all over Europe during this period and for nearly 150 years late, till the early 19th century, and the end of the Napoleonic wars.
Then there were burnings at the stake for religious reasons, for the so-called apostates. The Catholic Church routinely burnt Protestants at the stake and vice versa. After Henry VIII of England, Queen Mary was Catholic, then Elizabeth I was Protestant & Church of England. So Mary burnt Protestants and Elizabeth burnt Catholics at the stake, though to be fair to her, it was very largely for political reasons, as many Catholics were plotting to assassinate her, with the active help of King Philip of Spain.
The Spanish Inquisition, of the Catholic Church, routinely 'applied the question'an euphemism for brutal torture on the rack, to suspected apostates, 'to save their souls'
So burning alive must have been, for the Mughals, just a variant on their other practice of walling convicted prisoners alive. More economical in terms to wall space, I suppose (that is black humour, don't take it seriously!)., Down south, they used to have the convicted criminal buried up to his neck, and then get an elephant to knock his head off.
So all this would have been par for the course then. But I still feel that Jodha Akbar is becoming all too harsh and bitter.
Ela, I did not think Jalal's look at Jodha, shown in extreme close up, was passionate. I thought it seemed murderous, and she glared right back at him, not the least bit afraid. Probably being mentally prepared for Jauhar makes it easier for her to contemplate being burned alive, I do not know!
Shyamala
Originally posted by: elasingh
Rose I think all 3 that is Jalal, MA and maan will work together...
29