No my dear Khush,I do not think that is the kind of love either Ammijaan or Ekta's CVs are talking about. They are talking about what the French would call
 le grand amour, a passionate, all absorbing obsession which would count the world well lost for the love or the loved one. 
That is not an 'abstract definition'; it is in fact the most common understanding of romantic love. Romeo and Juliet. Shirin-Farhad, Laila-Majnu, did not base their passionate relationships on "mutual respect, caring, loyalty and a dedication to a common goal, that of raising a good family. " They were swept away on the tide of a desperate longing for each other. 
And no, you are not 'too dumb', it is just that you are defining another kind of love, the calm, settled variety where the one makes no excessive demands on the other and where neither haunts the consciousness of the other, but they stand for each other and with each other when the need arises, and they care a lot for each other. In the later years of a marriage, this is what could be called 'old shoe love'. 
I did not go by this definition because this is not what the CVs mean when they go on and on about 
mohabbat, Especially between our lead pair They mean 
deewangee, an obsession that leaves no room for anything else and takes you over body and soul. That is what that Farida is talking about as well.
If your kind of love was what Hamida meant, why then she does not have to look too far. It is there already between Jalal and Ruqaiya, only he will not call it any kind of love and so she does not dare do so either. There is caring and a very high comfort level, loyalty, and terrific mutual understanding, so this is also love. I don't see anything wrong with his loving her for her brains, for they are surely part of her, and she cannot want him to love her without them!😉 Her problem is that he will not permit any softer angle to their relationship at all. It is all sparring and mind games. Plus she wants a child.
And there have love sagas even before this era where such lovers existed ! 😆 Yes of course, but that is not the point here. Hamida is talking as though no couple can have kids if they are not in love. That is plain and simple balderdash. Especially in royal families of that era. So you are not wrong in what you say, but she definitely is.
Shyamala Aunty
Originally posted by: -Khush-
Shyamala aunty your answer to me in an affirmative lies in your write up only !
"Thank you, Khush, and no, I was not talking of no love in arranged marriages before the marriage alone, but after it as well., As in most royal marriages of that period as well. The marriages succeeded on the basis of mutual respect, caring, loyalty and a dedication to a common goal, that of raising a good family. "
If mutual respect , caring, loyalty ,etc does not form a basis for love then I am may be too dumb to understand your abstract definition of love ! 😆 love is not something that is defined... For some love is to trust, respect each other , care for each other, stand by each other in tough times, be loyal, and to hold each other at every step of life ! For some it's also all about physicality! And maybe that is what Hamida means ... As for Jalal in blunt lingo just making out to produce babies is the criteria and many believed in that And do so, but like Fatima said to them , ruqaiya still longs for a jalal for whom she wouldn't have to play games to be his favorite in the harem and would himself love her for what she is then for her brains only , or the Jalal who would turn his world up if something happened to her or for her! And there have love sagas even before this era where such lovers existed ! 😆
 Edited by sashashyam - 12 years ago
 
 
45