SIMPLE MATHEMATICS - Page 3

Originally posted by: khamosshhh

Hey Zeph!

I have just read ur post and U know I don't watch the show so u can call me a neutral non-viewer.😆 Anyways I don't agree dat voting does not take place or the voting system is unaccounted for. I am sure dat auditing takes place and votes are accounted for. Also I suppose online voting is taken into consideration and many may not spend money, but as online voting is free and I assume can be done multiple times, so celeb fans surely must be making use of it.

Hmm..ok..what I am saying is voting is a black box..we dont know what happened or happens..none of us know the actual ranking of the contestants correct? What I am saying is...colors know the trend..so we assume voting is trends are fixed..no manipulation...therefore, what is the lever which is in hands of the producers now? - Marks rt...thats why I say it is a trump card...because once u r aware of the voting ranges and ranks..you manipulate the marks to ensure your candidate is safe...

I dont get it..maine confuse kar diya hai kya...for my calculation i am assuming voting is a balck box for us to discuss hence assume whatever it is..is rt..

As far as marks given by the judges are concerned, again taking your assessment into consideration that marks are not given on the basis of performances, then possible reason could be that judges give marks as per the channel instructions coz though voting too is taken into consideration, but the channel wants to ensure that apart from popularity a particular contestant appears if not the best at least a gud dancer. Plus low marks could mean a face off where the contestants r totally at the mercy of the judges and more so the scrutinizing eyes of the viewers where their weaknesses can't be overlooked.


yes, marks are definitely manipulated..at times..i will not discredit all of the performances..for any contestant..

Also if we take the ranking into consideration. Suppose the most popular dancer has got the lowest score from the judges and hence has 1 point, but gets highest votes and hence has 6 points. So his/her average is 3.5 and it's vice-versa for another dancer so his/ her average is also 3.5...but the channel will not want a face-off between dem so I suppose manipulations in judges' marks.

Precisely my point...it is easier and less risky to manipulate the marks

Originally posted by: Arnav90

Simple mathematics like in clg, 60 marks for written 40 marks for assesment, Somebody got 60 in written n 30 in assesment total 90 but somebody got 50 in written n 40 in assesment total 90, So here it makes diffrent 60 u can take as performance marks n 40 as voting

Originally posted by: enigmatic_zephy

i think they mentioned in the beginning it is 50%-50%...and what i am saying is the voting 50% is fixed or trends are obvious..so more u vote or less u vote won't change much..because...the channel manipulates on the marks and ensures preferred candidates hv an edge..and thereby i call marks the trump card..

Originally posted by: enigmatic_zephy

LOL seems we are saying the same thing differently...Yeah agree it's less risky to manipulate the marks as lesser ppl also involved whereas voting manipulation can be dicey! Whatever the case but the bottom line is manipulations happen and contestants get chucked out or saved due to channel dynamics.😉

Originally posted by: -Queenie-

First time in my life hated maths🤔

Originally posted by: Wicked-Anoshka

Muje samaj nahi aye avi vi..Dimaag ke dahi (yoghurt) ban Gaya 😳

DD KO example lekar fir se try and explain😆 maybe then I'll get it...so how come DD dint come in bottom 2 last time? What's the logic re?