Did Lauren - Punit deserve 30 ? - Page 4

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

Lauren Punit TOTALLY deserved 30!!!

Fantastic act, fantastic execution! It is awesome Lauren is trying to learn new things rather than do the same stuff that she is probably an expert in. Her expressions, speed, postures everything was superb!

And Punit choreographed the whole act pretty well too!

Originally posted by: -3raser-

I see where your coming from but the problem is that when Indian contestants have performed Western styles they have been lacking. For example Isha from last year had problems with her posture when she did Waltz. She did try something new but it also did contain technical faults. Like I said I don't know much about classical as much as I know of ballroom. Anyhow...it's my opinion and I rest it at that.

Originally posted by: manesha76

Lauren is professional for her flexibility should not come . Also some of our girls must have not done Jazz - Jive - Tango - Rumba in their life . But even they are trying something new . Anyways i was just putting my POV .

Originally posted by: Rihan05

Agree, she is professional it should not be tough for her!!

Originally posted by: Backpiper

Not a 30/30 performance. Judges were biased. Aartis performance was also nice but Remo was stricter in giving comments & marks.

Originally posted by: Savz_uniqueblis

Act was good but it's not 30/30 act

Originally posted by: manesha76

I want to see more awesome performance so i thought they should have got less then 30 .

Originally posted by: Rihan05

27, wld hv been better marks for her, the judges shld be little more strict and shld not always gv 30 to any contestant whenever they feel, only the best performance shld get a full 30, They shld not be so lenient, the way they are nw!!