So I go around and I see so many topics on Lauren getting a 30. I think that the reason why she got a 30 was because the people that went on Saturday had gotten marks that were higher than what they had deserved. Hence, everyone on Sunday also got marks according to that. If judges give out 9's and 8's for performances that were lacking than they obviously would look dumb giving out 8's and 9's for better performances.
I agree that Lauren and Shaan could have been much better but at the same time, they had surpassed the level of the other dancers.
Now, coming to the concept. See the show is unfair in itself. If you are saying that having Lauren and Isha is unfair to all the other contestants than having KVB or Shweta is also unfair to the inexperienced Suresh and Srikkanth. Everyone on this show is at a different calibre of dancing. If it were to really be fair than you would need 12 Suresh or Srikkanth's. Everyone would have to be on the same level.
And why are all of you worrying...we all know that Lauren won't win. I just enjoy contestants like her because I get to see atleast one performance that is pitch perfect.
Other than that, I feel the judges need to set their score system straight because they barely use their #1 to #7 cards at all. It should be like this according to me:
5 - Average...
6 - Okay performance
7 - Good performance but some mistakes
8 - Good performance
9 - A great performance but not par the potential of the duo
10 - The best
Edited by -3raser- - 12 years ago