JDJ's concept is RIGGED and ABSURD!

Isn't JDJ about non-dancers participating with choreographers and challenging each-other?

agree with u fully Lauren is great dancer i like to watch her but she suld not be in jdj but i loved the kids performance they were out of world

And then people complain about unfairness of popularity of contestants, who are non-dancers. I mean people will say what the hell Lauren got evicted because these people dont vote for good dancers, but the concept of jhalak itself is ununderstandable. So voting+marks its fair but what about those who are non-dancers and non-popular!

Anyways as long as my fav. isnt there, I dont care why is jhalak unfair! Celebs chose this show, so they know better.

agreed to ur post ..bt as shaan is complete non dancer ,he deserved tht 30,though iam supportin kids too bt they r very professional,they have won already so many prizes,specially india"s got talent champ they r..

kids 30 was well deserved ,true
bt shaan did his best as non dancer..i dont think he deserved leas thn this:)

Completely agree wid you

😆 Nice post chakku 😉. And so true . The show is supposed to be about amateur dancers not professionals 😕

Completely agree with you chakku... Its unfair:-\

nice post..which is rarity in this forum..

I agree to most of it except the caliber of contestants..
IMO, Lauren and kids beat everyone hands down..and Srikant and Suresh def figure at the bottom
however I think ST (though she was disappointing but she justs needs to find her footing and she will be back with a bang) amd KVB (that guy has energy and two years of Kathak are seen in the body language while dancing) are at the same level..then come Shaan, DD, Meghna, Aarti and Ekta and below them Sid..

the whole concept is itself flawed..since its based on multiple voting...
of course its not fair that everybody else has to compete with Lauren (who I feel is better than Puneet at places and could very well be choreographing him had he been a contestant) and kids..
at the same time its not fair that Ekta (relativeky unknown) has to compete with ST or DD or Shaan who are popular..

At times I feel the judges are a little uneven at judging coz they know in the end..their marks dont count for much(doesnt mean they should not be doing their job properly)..they are fair at places amd tend to be too strict or lineant at other..
neither Shaan nor Lauren deserved 30..but since Shaan was given 30, it made sense to give Lauren the same as well..
Arti was overscored this week and KVB underscored..other I think were fine and fair

another issue..Madhuri looks like she is out to be sweet to everyone and not judge and KJo copies Remo (who thankfully is beong critical but not with all)

agree with u i think colors making jdj so obvious kind of rigid by taking isha n lauren kind of contestants. If u see previous seasons on sony there are quite balance n fair panel of contestants