Why Karan does/doesnt deserve to win?

Karan dont deserve to win, reasons :

1. Lowest scorer of Jhalak season 3

2. No as such amazing performances given by him

3. Lowest scorer for the maximum times

3. Judges dont see him in the list of top 3 finalists forget becoming the winner

isnt this enough😆

Ditto. I have absolutely nothing against the guy. No intentions of bashing him for no reason. I adore the guy. He is cute and funny, simply awesome.

Originally posted by: Mickee

Guys

I think this question is relevant as lots of people are dying to see karan win and lots of other people are dying not to see karan win..😆

So the question is Why Karan does/doesnt deserve to win a dancing show! Iam stressing the point that Iam not a Karan hater. Guys,please read the bold part. Please cite the reasons what make him does/doesnt deserve it. The winner of a dancing show should be called the best dancer. So the reasons should convince that fact!

According to me..Karan doesnt deserve to win. And the reasons are strictly mine. You can agree/disagree.

My reasons are:1)Considering the show till the last elimination Karan has been the lowest scorer.

2)Regarding the choreographer,Nicole's performances most of the times fall into the 'weak' category again comparing her with the choreographers who already left like Savio,Javed and Toby.

3)Karan's performances were always inconsistent and it doesnt offer any novelty or creativity

Originally posted by: MissSunshine

Hello! Where did the two 29s go?

the person is talking about the overall scores which is still the lowest and NOW will always remain the lowest. Didnt get a single 30 in whole of season 3

Originally posted by: MissSunshine

Hello! Where did the two 29s go?

Originally posted by: Mickee

I appreciate your feeling..I told lowest scorer after calculating the total scores in the show till the last elimination..I didnt tell that he is the lowest scorer in all the episodes..Hope you got it..😊

Well,not neglecting the two 29's he got..He did get good scores for the wonderful performances..But that wonder was not consistent..I also mentioned that..

Its not a generalised view as I told earlier..Just a personal opinion..And thanks for disagreeing..thats the spirit...

Originally posted by: MissSunshine

LOL What's the point of allowing public votes if the judges' scores are what makes you decide who "deserves" to win?

Originally posted by: MissSunshine

LOL What's the point of allowing public votes if the judges' scores are what makes you decide who "deserves" to win?

Public voting is done just to know the scope of their money making buisness by calculating that how much sensible public is, if public is not sensible then there are chances of them continuing their buisness in future as well😆