JDJ is scripted right ?? - Page 4

What?! Bharti is in the finals?! How do you guys know?? 🤢

Originally posted by: dz651

What?! Bharti is in the finals?! How do you guys know??🤢

that nothing to be shocked about. Mark my words, she will be in the finals.. I got to knw from my friend and confirmed it with someone here from their source n turned to be true.


We got to knw the list of whom gttn out in order. :/
Anyway am not spilling any beans here

its sooo scripted whether ur fav wins or nt 😉

This is the first time I'm watching JDJ so I am not sure if its scripted or not. But as with all reality shows, I'm sure there are pointers handed out based on which contestants and judges act. So who knows.

Originally posted by: Dexterkilaila

This is the first time I'm watching JDJ so I am not sure if its scripted or not. But as with all reality shows, I'm sure there are pointers handed out based on which contestants and judges act. So who knows.

As for Isha-Salman case, I don't see how an injury can be scripted. She got hurt on the job, it happens...only natural. But to keep giving them second chances despite no performance two weeks in a row is what I find completely unfair. Its not fair to those that got voted out in the past episodes and its not fair to the contestants at present. Nor is it fair to the voters that vote week upon week.

Only thing I'll say is that injury induced week she got 0/60, no special treatment, if votes are saving her then it's the format. It's like some contestants who perform bad or even worse than others, they get saved on votes while the ones getting high scores get voted out. That isn't fair either, but that's the format, so one has to accept it. And people are voting for Isha as well when she isn't performing, so you can't say those voters don't deserve the same treatment as any other voters, that's beyond my logic (and from what I have seen voting does take precedence over dancing, seen with Shibani and Darsheel). As per the VETO, that's judges call, I can say based on her outstanding record on the stage she deserves to stay especially since it's her injury which stopped her from performing, but then others might not agree. So agree to disagree on that. And these statements are merely made overlooking in sorta manipulation which might be happening,

Rest is your opinion, so won't comment.

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-

Only thing I'll say is that injury induced week she got 0/60, no special treatment, if votes are saving her then it's the format. It's like some contestants who perform bad or even worse than others, they get saved on votes while the ones getting high scores get voted out. That isn't fair either, but that's the format, so one has to accept it. And people are voting for Isha as well when she isn't performing, so you can't say those voters don't deserve the same treatment as any other voters, that's beyond my logic (and from what I have seen voting does take precedence over dancing, seen with Shibani and Darsheel). As per the VETO, that's judges call, I can say based on her outstanding record on the stage she deserves to stay especially since it's her injury which stopped her from performing, but then others might not agree. So agree to disagree on that. And these statements are merely made overlooking in sorta manipulation which might be happening,

Rest is your opinion, so won't comment.

Originally posted by: Dexterkilaila

You're mixing the two things or maybe you don't want to see it because you're an Isha fan. If she was saved by votes for a bad performance, fine...that is the format...so that's fair and square. But...since when is voting on account of no performance the format of the show?? So if its not in the format at all, how can it be fair? Why wasn't Deepak allowed to appeal for Pratyusha when she fell sick? Why wasn't Avneet allowed to take the week off when her hand was injured and still allowed to appeal for votes?

If you think that is the format of the show and you find it fair, then that format should apply to everyone, not just Isha. It would have been fair if Avneet was allowed to take the week off...hell...make that two weeks...why not? If its good for the goose, it should be good for the gander.

Yes I am her fan and my bias for her might be speaking from time to time, doesn't mean I can't see the other unfair things happening. I was merely speaking from Isha's POV.

If you wanna count all the unfair things happening in the show, there won't be any show left.

About Pratyashu, one thing I can say is that she didn't impress either the judges or the audience, so no VETO for her and thus her exit and that too based on her votes (if you don't wanna believe that, then it's your prerogative)

Avneet hand injury or even GC or even anyone else for that matter, I do not know how severe the injury was. So I can't comment and say whether they should have been allowed the week off or not. That is up to the doctors and JDJ makers. Saying that I am in no way saying there injury was piece of cake. All the injuries are painful. And we don't know how many times Isha or other contestants have gone through, painful but doable injuries, not shown to us on TV. By bringing pratyashu or Avneet in the discussion, are you implying Isha should have performed with the broken hand

Anyways, if you think I have blinders, then so do others, cuz for everyone there is always some sorta bias and I am not talking about being a fan. Bias can be of any form.

who knows isha is injured?it may be scripted to give rest to duo as in he end they are th winner and they must be practising for semifinal very heard to win this game.bharti is there as she is providing good entertainment to increase the trp and gurmeet is also bringing trp chart up si even his last performance he didnt do well? inspite i will say he has been given all lousiest theme to perform,1-police 2-joker-3robot all theses are the worst performance and worst choreographed and i feel it is also scripted so that gurmeet should live in end and as such i am fan of gurmeet it doesn't mean i will vote for them whether they perform good or bad i will see the concept and their performance and will vote but i lost interest in voting as it is all scripted and contestant are working as the instruction from boss ,how can you judge the performance on credential basis?

Originally posted by: Dexterkilaila

You're mixing the two things or maybe you don't want to see it because you're an Isha fan. If she was saved by votes for a bad performance, fine...that is the format...so that's fair and square. But...since when is voting on account of no performance the format of the show?? So if its not in the format at all, how can it be fair? Why wasn't Deepak allowed to appeal for Pratyusha when she fell sick? Why wasn't Avneet allowed to take the week off when her hand was injured and still allowed to appeal for votes?

If you think that is the format of the show and you find it fair, then that format should apply to everyone, not just Isha. It would have been fair if Avneet was allowed to take the week off...hell...make that two weeks...why not? If its good for the goose, it should be good for the gander.

About Avneet, she didn't have to perform. They could have had someone else in Avneet's place as Darsheel was the contestant and Avneet the dancing partner. I didn't watch this week's Rithvik's performance but I read somewhere that Sneha couldn't perform and they had to get someone else in her place to perform with Rithvik a little late in the week.

Remember Salman's neck injury just a day before the shooting? Cornell was asked to step in his place and had only 8 hours to practice. So the point about Avneet, I think, is null and void in this discussion as she could have been replaced with someone else. It's the celeb that must perform not the dancing partner as they can be substituted.

Regarding Pratyusha's exit or elimination from the show it was too early in the competition. Had Isha or any other strong contender been injured that early in the competition I am pretty sure they (the channel) would have shown him/her the door too and correct me if I am wrong but wasn't Pratyusha voted out due to less votes and less scores? If she was ill then that was all on her because she was shooting another show at the same time. She could have refused to participate in JDJ5 or quit the other one but she didn't. She must have thought that she could manage it somehow. It didn't work is another matter.

See the thing is the channel have a fixed number of weeks that they have to air JDJ5. If Isha quits then sure they could have gone with no elimination this coming week and still be able to fill in the required week slots. That's upto the channel. I am pretty sure the no-elimination week had already been pre-planned by the channel because they had flown in 6 international choreographers so if one couple was eliminated it would have been a bad investment from the channel for that celeb's international dancing partner's travelling and staying in India expenses. If they had flown-in only 5 and the remaining one couple was eliminated - everyone would have said the elimination was pre-planned and that it's scripted. Now, although there are speculations that it's scripted (myself included in those speculators) there is still that 'what if it's not scripted?' thing still in the air (myself included in these speculators too😳).

I am not defending Isha's direct entry to semi-finals but just explaining that the contestants/dancing partners you mentioned had other reasons for why they weren't given the no-performance-and-still-in-the-competition option. I was kind of okay with Isha not performing but still getting votes as she got 0 out of 60 that week but this jump straight to semi-finals without performing is another topic of discussion altogether.

I remember in one of the Dancing with the Stars season a very good contestant who got perfect 30s each week had to quit mid-way due to injury. Personally, I feel Isha should have been given the same option. Did she have that option and still chose to stay in the competition? Is the Channel not letting her quit because she signed a legally binding contract with them which has any such clause pertaining to any such incidents? We don't know and I doubt we'll ever know. It could be either Isha not wanting to quit or the channel not wanting her to - there is another topic in the stickies for that discussion.

Also, I think you are misunderstanding the Topic Maker's (TM) posts intention. What s/he was trying to say was that everyone says JDJ5 is scripted and that the judges's scores are rigged if the celeb they are supporting gets low marks or gets eliminated but if their fav celeb is given higher marks and stays in the compeition then those very same people say that JDJ5 is not scripted and that Judges are right. I reckon it was this illogical reasoning that must have prompted the TM to open this topic.

p.s. i mean no disrespect to anyone😊

edited: does anyone know why my comments are showing up in the Quote too? I have triple checked that the right number of opening and closing [Quote] thing is in the post but am getting confused now😕

Originally posted by: idunno

who knows isha is injured?it may be scripted to give rest to duo as in he end they are th winner and they must be practising for semifinal very heard to win this game.bharti is there as she is providing good entertainment to increase the trp and gurmeet is also bringing trp chart up si even his last performance he didnt do well? inspite i will say he has been given all lousiest theme to perform,1-police 2-joker-3robot all theses are the worst performance and worst choreographed and i feel it is also scripted so that gurmeet should live in end and as such i am fan of gurmeet it doesn't mean i will vote for them whether they perform good or bad i will see the concept and their performance and will vote but i lost interest in voting as it is all scripted and contestant are working as the instruction from boss ,how can you judge the performance on credential basis?

for me isha is performing acrobat,not dance we need expression,acting and performance and chemistry-issha has good chemistry with her choreographer but still ...?

@ after reading your first line, I didn't bother reading the rest. Thanks for your input though !!!